I don't think it's "disrespect" to play your starting QB a few snaps in the first preseason game. Russ obviously won't play a ton in the preseason.
Just because wrapping QBs in bubble wrap until week one has become the norm, doesn't mean it is good coaching.
I also do believe that fans deserve to see the starters for at least a series or two in preseason games, like we ALWAYS did not too long ago.
I realize this is about Seattle fans hating on Russ more than anything else, but for fans to be saying that a head coach with a NEW team is showing "disrespect" by playing his starters a bit in the first preseason game is almost beyond the pale.
Yeah, the hating on Russell thing has become the norm with my fellow Seahawk fans. How in the hell does anyone know that Russell was
"ordered" to play? You don't typically call a starting lineup put up by the coach
"orders" as if they're in the army or something, but if you want to make Player X look bad, you use the term to make it appear as if he didn't want to play and was forced to by his coach.
We don't even know whose decision it was last season to sit him out, with the greatest likelihood being that it was a joint decision that both player and coach agreed on. But whoever decision it was, it was extremely unwise, one that Payton and/or Russell aren't going to repeat and one that I happen to agree with. Russell needs the work, and Payton needs to see how his $1/4 billion quarterback adjusts to his new offense in a game situation.
The league wide trend has been to sit starters in the preseason more so than in the past. It used to be that all the starters played in every preseason game except the last one, with PS Game 3 seeing the starters play for 3/4 of the game. But it's now a 17 game season with expanded playoffs and teams are antsy about exposing their stars that they have given these enormous contracts to being injured in a meaningless game.