Lagartixa
Well-known member
LTH":31gzkuzy said:I'm not going to do it but, I betcha if you look at the stats you will see that when the Hawks run the ball 25-30 times a game there record is better than when they run it say 15-20 times a game..
[snip]
LTH
Well of course you'd see that. But I think you might be getting the cause and the effect mixed up. One of the things the guys at FootballOutsiders figured out is that "you don't win because you're running a lot; you run a lot because you're winning." When a team is ahead, starting some time in the second half of the third quarter or in the fourth quarter (depending on the size of the lead), that team should be running as much as is feasible in order to burn up the clock. Every incomplete pass is a great gift to the team that's behind.
Let's see if Russell Wilson and the vaunted Shane Waldron can remember that after the spanking they got by trying more deep passes when the Titans were basically begging them to take the available short and medium-length passes, and not taking the gifts the Titans were offering led to the 'Hawks going three-and-out when a few first downs and a bunch of running plays could have iced the victory.
No, I'm not a "Wilson hater." But I do recognize that the huge number of sacks he takes is at least as much on him as on the OL, and it frustrates the crap out of me that he frequently ignores (or just doesn't see) the opportunities for short and intermediate stuff where he's got guys wide open because he's looking to make the SportsCenter highlights with "home runs." Don't get me wrong - I love his rainbow "moon shots" for monster gains. I still feel a certain exhilaration whenever I just think about that one to Lockett in the game against KC in 2018. I just wish he'd keep defenses honest by taking more of the opportunities they give him for less-spectacular but better-for-the-team shorter passes.
Trevor Moawad told Wilson in 2012 that what would set Wilson apart was Wilson's mind. I believe Wilson can get this and I'm hoping he will.