BGHawk
Active member
Hurry back oline
The two passes that were not fought for, were crucial mistakes.Largent80":3lqbs2cd said:So the 2 TD's he scored the week before were phantom catches?
scutterhawk":3jbd8bwe said:The two passes that were not fought for, were crucial mistakes.Largent80":3jbd8bwe said:So the 2 TD's he scored the week before were phantom catches?
I could understand ONE, but two Weeks in a row?, I'm not sold.
Largent80":12qsv8d0 said:Tate caught 1 ball last week, same as Rice, THAT was all on O-Line. Cut him too?
Part of that is on Bevell for not getting the ball out quick which is part of making adjustments. We all know our line is suffering, why not help all the receivers and QB by at least calling some plays to help both of them. Slants....3 step drops, bubbles....Where are they when we need them. They are going to keep blitzing us because it is working.
Get that ball out quick and in space, THAT will help everyone.
SoulfishHawk":2x13wly6 said:I'm a huge fan of Rice, not even considering giving up on him.
You see, I'M NOT ADVOCATING CUTTING RICE, but I do believe he's a LOT better than he has shown himself to be, in these last two games.Largent80":1uwg4smb said:scutterhawk":1uwg4smb said:The two passes that were not fought for, were crucial mistakes.Largent80":1uwg4smb said:So the 2 TD's he scored the week before were phantom catches?
I could understand ONE, but two Weeks in a row?, I'm not sold.
When he scores again, nothing is for sale to you....Bye. And I will be here to remind you when it happens, and it WILL happen often.
Bigpumpkin":yt2hcu94 said:Hey Largent80...you know this bunch. It's always, "What have you done for me lately?"
hawker84":3fgy7n07 said:I just want the best recievers on the field. And right now Tate, Baldwin, Kearse are doing more with the same amount of targets as Rice. Take from that what you want. At this point i'd rather see Kearse getting more opportunities...