Bump: Why Seahawks made right call with OC pick

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
35,927
Reaction score
16,930
Location
Sammamish, WA
I was thinking about how cool it would be if we could actually see them play a few regular season games before we actually judge?
 

DarkVictory23

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
2,012
Reaction score
2,993
Then we are screwed, I read on .NET that Carr is better than Geno. Oh wait, we have Howell, who may be better than Carr, he just needs coaching and opportunities
Carr is a good QB, better than average. Seahawks could do significantly worse at QB.

If I were to give out 'grades' in terms of what QBs bring to the table, both Geno and Carr would be 'B' grade guys right now, but Geno is at the cusp of B+, Carr is sitting firmly entrenched in the B zone.

One of the reasons why, though, that Geno is closing in on that B+ zone--and Carr isn't--is because Carr doesn't lead an offense as efficiently in those types of come from behind situations, whereas Geno has been one of the best in the league.

So, to the degree that the Saints being unable to pull ahead in late game situations is based on the QB, the Seahawks would undeniably be in a better spot with Geno than New Orleans was with Carr. That said, if the primary reason they struggle to come from behind is because Kubiak's scheme... well, then that's a different problem.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
35,927
Reaction score
16,930
Location
Sammamish, WA
One of the best in the league? Against bad teams. There's a HUGE difference between that and knocking off elite, playoff level teams.
We all have our definition of clutch.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,384
Reaction score
9,108
Location
SoCal Desert
Kubiak is going to be fine. I'm excited to see what he does and sometimes a fresh start allows you to fix some things too. He's very well respected for a reason.
Respected enough that Saints are considering Kellen Moore and even Mike Kafka for their HC instead of their own Kubiak? Moore and Kafka have shorter resumes and less experience.

 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,384
Reaction score
9,108
Location
SoCal Desert
One of the reasons why, though, that Geno is closing in on that B+ zone--and Carr isn't--is because Carr doesn't lead an offense as efficiently in those types of come from behind situations, whereas Geno has been one of the best in the league.
You are on .NET, that statement isn't going to end well :)
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
35,927
Reaction score
16,930
Location
Sammamish, WA
Meh. This geNO subject is really getting old and stale. He'll be our QB next year. And hopefully it's the final year.
And yes, it's a very important subject, I get that part. Free agency and the draft is going to be VERY entertaining this year.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,384
Reaction score
9,108
Location
SoCal Desert
Meh. This geNO subject is really getting old and stale. He'll be our QB next year. And hopefully it's the final year.
And yes, it's a very important subject, I get that part. Free agency and the draft is going to be VERY entertaining this year.
there are cheaper, or younger options.
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
9,105
Location
Cockeysville, Md
Carr is a good QB, better than average. Seahawks could do significantly worse at QB.

If I were to give out 'grades' in terms of what QBs bring to the table, both Geno and Carr would be 'B' grade guys right now, but Geno is at the cusp of B+, Carr is sitting firmly entrenched in the B zone.

One of the reasons why, though, that Geno is closing in on that B+ zone--and Carr isn't--is because Carr doesn't lead an offense as efficiently in those types of come from behind situations, whereas Geno has been one of the best in the league.

So, to the degree that the Saints being unable to pull ahead in late game situations is based on the QB, the Seahawks would undeniably be in a better spot with Geno than New Orleans was with Carr. That said, if the primary reason they struggle to come from behind is because Kubiak's scheme... well, then that's a different problem.
Careful. You are speaking wayyy too much logic .
 

cymatica

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
5,279
Reaction score
4,157
Which is why I find it odd our biggest Geno supporters seem to be the ones that aren't thrilled about Kubiak. He is bringing everything they complained Grubb didn't use. I don't get it. Well I do have a theory but that's for another time.
Not sure where you came up with that. I've been a Geno supporter and Kubiak is the guy I wanted. I would think most would want this since Geno's best numbers are while running play action
 

cymatica

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
5,279
Reaction score
4,157
I definitely like the addition of Kubiak but what's more important is personnel and fixing the 2 guard and center position. Grubb was not great but it's really hard to coach around a dumpster fire at OL. Grubb definitely should have called passing plays that didn't take so long to develop but it is absolutely impossible to scheme a running game when the OL was as bad as it was. He tried calling run plays but it always resulted in 0 or negative yards. He also didn't call play action very much but that is contigent on how effective your running game is.

Schneider is gonna have to draft OL and get OL in FA because the last 15 years of neglect and bad picks has been terrible but I honestly wonder how much influence Pete had on this because building everything from athletic positions(CB/S/RB/WR) first was a horrible, horrible way of building, up front matters most.
Grubb made the oline much worse with his play calling and there's several articles that go over all the details. It boils down to predictability based on personnel and formations. Can't expect an Oline to have success in the run game when you tip your hat almost every play and defenses don't have to think.
 

bileever

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 16, 2022
Messages
1,996
Reaction score
2,720
Respected enough that Saints are considering Kellen Moore and even Mike Kafka for their HC instead of their own Kubiak? Moore and Kafka have shorter resumes and less experience.

Who knows what the Saints ownership is thinking? I don't think we should evaluate Kubiak based on what the Saints are doing. I think that usually when teams decide to blow things up, they want a fresh start.

Moore, Kafka and Kubiak are similar in age and experience. I disagree that Moore and Kafka have less experience. Kellen Moore has been an OC for 6 consecutive years, including for the Super Bowl-bound Eagles. Kafka has been the OC for the last three years. Kubiak has only 2 years as an offensive coordinator.
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
11,647
Reaction score
6,495
Not sure where you came up with that. I've been a Geno supporter and Kubiak is the guy I wanted. I would think most would want this since Geno's best numbers are while running play action
You're one person. Many of the others don't view it that way. And I agree, Kubiak seems to bring a lot of the stuff that would benefit Geno and the stuff people have been begging Grubb to utilize.
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
11,647
Reaction score
6,495
Who knows what the Saints ownership is thinking? I don't think we should evaluate Kubiak based on what the Saints are doing. I think that usually when teams decide to blow things up, they want a fresh start.

Moore, Kafka and Kubiak are similar in age and experience. I disagree that Moore and Kafka have less experience. Kellen Moore has been an OC for 6 consecutive years, including for the Super Bowl-bound Eagles. Kafka has been the OC for the last three years. Kubiak has only 2 years as an offensive coordinator.
OC and Coaching are two massively different jobs/skillsets. I couldn't care less if he's viewed as a terrible head coaching candidate.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
40,591
Reaction score
2,918
Location
Roy Wa.
Coaching you teaching skill, technique, offense implementation, OC you create game plans, oversee your coaches and direct them on what a player needs to improve on, game day you are a chess player and live strategist to call plays.
 

nanomoz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
7,833
Reaction score
1,791
Location
UT
You’re certainly not comparing Mike Macdonald to the peeps on this forum I hope 🤣🤣🤣
I'm pointing out that your statement's definiltives are pure silliness.

Some people are good at watching football. A lot of them barely even played it.
 

Latest posts

Top