Fansided hating on Kupp

SeaWolv

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,831
Reaction score
1,168
Exactly my point. I suggest you re-read what was written.

No, your point was to suggest that because he signed somewhere else for less that means he wasn't willing to do that here and I'm saying you have no idea what went down. They may not have offered him a restructure and that was the end of it. They may have offered a new deal for less what Tennessee offered. They may have just cut him and offered nothing. The point is you have no idea what happened because no one has talked about the details.

I think you have a reading comprehension problem my friend.
I pointed out that Allen is closer to a career year than Kupp is. Yes they both have had injuries to deal with but it's been 3 seasons since Kupp had a career year and only one for Allen. It appears it is you that has the comprehension issue, friend.
 

DTiempo81

Active member
Joined
Nov 28, 2024
Messages
196
Reaction score
235
No, your point was to suggest that because he signed somewhere else for less that means he wasn't willing to do that here and I'm saying you have no idea what went down. They may not have offered him a restructure and that was the end of it. They may have offered a new deal for less what Tennessee offered. They may have just cut him and offered nothing. The point is you have no idea what happened because no one has talked about the details.

My point was he didn't do that here, regardless of what you WANT to have happened, or whatever made up scenario was happening in your head. Thank you for agreeing.


I pointed out that Allen is closer to a career year than Kupp is. Yes they both have had injuries to deal with but it's been 3 seasons since Kupp had a career year and only one for Allen. It appears it is you that has the comprehension issue, friend.

That wasn't the point at all. It was about being a known commodity. You put some arbitrary description about who was closer to a career year, which has absolutely nothing to do with being a known commodity.

My friend, you need to get out of your head, you aren't the one that sets what is or isn't. Both with Lockett and Kupp, what you think should be is apparently fact, and that's just not how reality works.
 

SeaWolv

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,831
Reaction score
1,168
My point was he didn't do that here, regardless of what you WANT to have happened, or whatever made up scenario was happening in your head. Thank you for agreeing.
Interesting, so now you're saying that because he's not here that means he must have rejected any offer from the Seahawks, thus assuming an offer was made, when yet again you have absolutely no idea.
That wasn't the point at all. It was about being a known commodity. You put some arbitrary description about who was closer to a career year, which has absolutely nothing to do with being a known commodity.
So you think Kupp is more of a known commodity than Allen??
My friend, you need to get out of your head, you aren't the one that sets what is or isn't. Both with Lockett and Kupp, what you think should be is apparently fact, and that's just not how reality works.
Never said I was, just stating a preference. Last I checked I was allowed to do that here.
 

DTiempo81

Active member
Joined
Nov 28, 2024
Messages
196
Reaction score
235
Interesting, so now you're saying that because he's not here that means he must have rejected any offer from the Seahawks, thus assuming an offer was made, when yet again you have absolutely no idea.

My goodness. No one has any idea, that's the point. The only thing we know is he is no longer a member of the Seahawks organization, regardless. Going back to your original point, it doesn't matter what he signed in Tennessee for, or that you would be willing to have him on the team for that amount.

So you think Kupp is more of a known commodity than Allen??

Wherever did I say that? My point was that Kupp is a known commodity, and saying that he isn't (along with some absolutely arbitrary stats that don't mean anything) is incorrect. You love moving the goal posts, apparently.

Never said I was, just stating a preference. Last I checked I was allowed to do that here.

You are using your "preference" to dictate facts. That's not how it works, my friend.

Either way, I am done with this interaction, because it is clear you are arguing in bad faith, or have no intention of taking an honest look at the words you are using. Cheers.
 
Last edited:

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
2,061
Reaction score
1,309
Location
Sequim
According to The Athletic, Milroe will not be just sitting on the bench. They will have some situational packages for him. I like it.
 

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
2,061
Reaction score
1,309
Location
Sequim
Milroe getting snaps will be cool, same goes for Lock.
I don’t mind Lock carrying a clipboard. He’s not the future QB1, but Milroe MIGHT be, so let’s find out what we have with him without throwing him in over his head right off the bat.
 
OP
OP
toffee

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,739
Reaction score
9,430
Location
SoCal Desert
I don’t mind Lock carrying a clipboard. He’s not the future QB1, but Milroe MIGHT be, so let’s find out what we have with him without throwing him in over his head right off the bat.
I ain't giving up on Lock yet, not after John Schneider signed him not once but twice. Schneider must see something in Lock that we couldn't. Pete/Geno hampered Lock's first employment with the Hawks; this time, he will shine.
 

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
2,061
Reaction score
1,309
Location
Sequim
It will be interesting to see whether Lock gets more playing time than Milroe. Do you want that?
 

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,445
Reaction score
1,510
Location
Taipei
According to The Athletic, Milroe will not be just sitting on the bench. They will have some situational packages for him. I like it.
the coaches wouldn't even know that yet. not until they see him working in the situational packages and see how he performs.
 

HawkFreak

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
2,106
Reaction score
1,436
I love how many are doubting Cooper effin Kupp. Keep it coming.
It's INSANE.

He WILL be a significant contributor to the offense.

He also will have more of a "move-this-team-forward-in-the-right-direction" impact on the locker room than either DK or Tyler would have had if they stayed. Good and necessary move by the team.
 

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
2,061
Reaction score
1,309
Location
Sequim
the coaches wouldn't even know that yet. not until they see him working in the situational packages and see how he performs.
Macdonald was very positive on what he saw in rookie minicamp, and by the time he gets through training camp, they will know what he can do at this stage.
 

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
3,224
Reaction score
1,402
I ain't giving up on Lock yet, not after John Schneider signed him not once but twice. Schneider must see something in Lock that we couldn't. Pete/Geno hampered Lock's first employment with the Hawks; this time, he will shine.
Yeah, he sees a back up QB which he is. Funny how much that twists your knickers that JS had the audacity to sign a back up behind Geno. The audacity!
No respect!
 

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
3,916
Reaction score
2,572
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
I ain't giving up on Lock yet, not after John Schneider signed him not once but twice. Schneider must see something in Lock that we couldn't. Pete/Geno hampered Lock's first employment with the Hawks; this time, he will shine.
Lock plays better as a Seahawk. Like Russ did and Geno did and Seneca Wallace did and Matt hasselbeck and all those back up corners that got huge contracts to leave…
 

Latest posts

Top