Spin Doctor
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,608
- Reaction score
- 2,842
Geno would win with a good team -- but the question remains, how much is Geno Smith going to cost and to what detriment will the cost of Geno's extension to build a competitive team? Geno is a good QB and honestly, he's played at the lower end of the top 10.Geno did not have a good game.
Geno also would win with a good team. A lot of posters seem to think that our problems start and end at QB. That's not how anything works. The gameplan didn't work today, DK had a brutal outing, our defense played well a few different drives and swiss cheese on every other.
This was a team loss, Geno included. This is not a good team, this is not a bad team, this is an 8-9 or 9-8 team.
Unfortunately he's looking for an extension, he's made a few remarks about his pay last offseason. Right now, he's a bargain compared to his colleagues. He's got a heavily incentive laced contract due to him being a one hit wonder when we signed him.
Now he has a few years of decent play under his belt, he has a lot more negotiation power behind him. He can demand a contract and get it whether it is from us or someone else.
The question that is more pertinent here is "Can Geno justify a top tier salary" and I see him as becoming a liability when we have to pay a large percentage of our cap.
Geno is a good QB, upper 1/3rd of the league at least. We cannot kid ourself, he is not a fluke, he's not a one hit wonder. He shows a level of QB play that is clearly above that of most QB's in the NFL. He has transcended backup status and now he's clearly a top 10, albeit low top 10 QB in the NFL. I honestly hated the idea of Smith, but I have to call a spade a spade, the dude isn't a scrub. People that don't see this (im agreeing with you to some degree here) are delusional at this point, ESPECIALLY given current QB trends.
That being said, paying him top tier QB money sounds like a recipe for disaster. He's clearly not an elite QB. The next question is, what detriment would Geno being paid as such, hamper the team?
I complimented Geno, but we also have to acknowledge his weak spots here. In the endzone, he has faltered compared the top tier QB's. He had among the lowest completion percentage the last few years that he started, and the Seahawks have been among the weakest redzone offenses while Geno has been the QB.
In addition, he has a tendency to pull a disappearing act. He's had a bad midseason slump each of the years he's started. He's a safe bet with some clear weaknesses, but also extremely predictable. He will provide you good enough play, but also -- he's never going to be a star in the NFL, he's never going to be a big name or creator. He's boring, but he's not a liability.
There is a lot of value i that, but I question is he's worth paying what the top guys are worth? Not doing so is for sure a risky move for Schneider. That kind of move did pay off once with Wilson, it may be worth revisiting later.