So I don't know that Pete is necessarily tipping his hand that he's looking to start both qbs this year. I think he's probably secure in starting either qb and is just going to feel out which one provides the x factor. Whether that X is reliable, steady play, or elusiveness and rare talent. Drew is more mobile, which is a differentiator, but it's nit as though bringing him in off the bench during the game would present some drastic change in terms of what we could threaten a defense with. He's just more talented.
What I gleaned from his presser was just a reinforcing of his core philosophy, which is taking care of the ball, playing complimentary ball, and not unnecessarily overcomplicating the game.
One of the big takeaways was that I think he made it a point to underscore and deserves mention is that contrary to what some on the forum think, his philosophy is NOT to only pass when necessary and have a run first game. He stated pretty clearly that you can control the game with the pass or the run, and that if the QB is effective and efficient, he's fine throwing the ball and having a strong passing game. He's just not going to expect a qb with limited ability to be the lead cog in his offense. He'll elevate other aspects of the offense and team to compliment what his qb can do. But if the qb can sling it, take care of the ball, and manage the game... he can have at it.
This tracks with the frustration he finally began to show over the last few years at being poor on 3rd downs and ineffective, reliably moving the ball through the air. We'd become boom or bust, and a boom or bust passing game isn't part of a ball control formula. If that's what your passing game is (because its proven ineffective at taking the plays that are there), then the only change of pace you can go to, is a running game.
Also notable was that he's saying that the passing game needs to avoid sacks and turnovers. So, secure with the ball, and distributing it quickly.
So I don't know that there was a ton new there. But I also know that Pete prides himself in being an innovator and zigging when others zag. It's a core tenet in innovative leadership and can pay huge dividends. So I wouldn't be surprised that in his coaching curtain call, he didn't test something new, that, similar to the other things he's brought to the game, ends up influences the way football is practiced and played in the future.