KiwiHawk
New member
Because he had some success when holding onto the ball, Wilson does it habitually. The Rams didn't even bother to cover short routes, because they know our tendencies, and Wilson's tendency is not to throw the short routes.Russ Willstrong":2fjjq4u0 said:Given that we are a running team and fundamentally a play action zone blocking offense the qb'srelease time wont be as quick as it would be from shotgun. Run plays and play action allows more congestion in the middle of the field too thats probably why we are passing more from a spread this year. To be a quicker passing team the offense must be committed to working on it on. The timing/chemistry isnt quite there and it can be any combination of reasons besides just Wilson. We have some new receivers, unproven O line talent, and conservative playcalling that contributes to poor play.
No doubt we can improve our quick passing game with consistent personnel and a commitment to developing these plays. However, we cant forget that Wilson has beaten pressure when he holds the ball. He's won many games doing this just as Rodgers has.
On a 1st-and-17 Bevell called a play that used 5 receivers all running short routes, taking advantage of the Rams playing so far off, so Wilson can get the ball out quickly and avoid the pass rush. Wilson held onto the ball instead of delivering a quick throw, and the play ended with a sack.

Notice the bottom of the screen where Lockett is coming out of his break. Wilson has a clear throwing lane, and the defender is nearly 10 yards away from Lockett. How does this end in a sack? If Wilson sees the route and how far away the defender is and delivers the ball so that it arrives as Lockett makes his break, I'd rate Lockett's chances of eluding a single defender, and then there's a whole lot of green ahead of him. Opportunity lost.