Hurtt would be a HORRIBLE choice as DC

RockinHawks

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
1,017
Reaction score
211
Isn't Pete the Head Coach, and shouldn't be be "running the show?" I mean, that's what a head coach does. He implements his plan and hires coaches to support that. An OC and DC will bring some of their ideas to the table, run some of their schemes, etc., but it's not like the head coach DOESN'T run the team the way he wants...otherwise, Pete wouldn't be a very good head coach.

I really liked what K.J. had to say about a head coach and coordinators... it starts with PERSONNEL. If you don't have the players, then it really won't matter what scheme you're running. Pete needs better players... some years it comes together, some years it doesn't. We're getting a fresh mind to run the defense, and bringing in other Fangio disciples to tweak the gameplan and get hopefully get some success pressuring the QB and getting more turnovers. Let's see what free agency and the draft bring us.

Hurtt has done NOTHING to warrant the negative criticism, or being labeled a "yes man," he's a quality coach who is young and has the respect of his players.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the negativity. I just don't like roasting someone before they've had a chance to succeed. Very weird.
 

xray

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
9,562
Reaction score
1,639
Location
AZ
It doesn't matter who Carroll hires . Carroll has and always will interfere with his coaching staff . The names change but he never will .
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,009
Reaction score
9,108
Location
Cockeysville, Md
RockinHawks":23hp34sr said:
Isn't Pete the Head Coach, and shouldn't be be "running the show?" I mean, that's what a head coach does. He implements his plan and hires coaches to support that. An OC and DC will bring some of their ideas to the table, run some of their schemes, etc., but it's not like the head coach DOESN'T run the team the way he wants...otherwise, Pete wouldn't be a very good head coach.

I really liked what K.J. had to say about a head coach and coordinators... it starts with PERSONNEL. If you don't have the players, then it really won't matter what scheme you're running. Pete needs better players... some years it comes together, some years it doesn't. We're getting a fresh mind to run the defense, and bringing in other Fangio disciples to tweak the gameplan and get hopefully get some success pressuring the QB and getting more turnovers. Let's see what free agency and the draft bring us.

Hurtt has done NOTHING to warrant the negative criticism, or being labeled a "yes man," he's a quality coach who is young and has the respect of his players.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the negativity. I just don't like roasting someone before they've had a chance to succeed. Very weird.

Well said
 
OP
OP
J

JayhawkMike

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
2,573
Reaction score
1,442
RockinHawks":jn8y9hfd said:
Isn't Pete the Head Coach, and shouldn't be be "running the show?" I mean, that's what a head coach does. He implements his plan and hires coaches to support that. An OC and DC will bring some of their ideas to the table, run some of their schemes, etc., but it's not like the head coach DOESN'T run the team the way he wants...otherwise, Pete wouldn't be a very good head coach.

I really liked what K.J. had to say about a head coach and coordinators... it starts with PERSONNEL. If you don't have the players, then it really won't matter what scheme you're running. Pete needs better players... some years it comes together, some years it doesn't. We're getting a fresh mind to run the defense, and bringing in other Fangio disciples to tweak the gameplan and get hopefully get some success pressuring the QB and getting more turnovers. Let's see what free agency and the draft bring us.

Hurtt has done NOTHING to warrant the negative criticism, or being labeled a "yes man," he's a quality coach who is young and has the respect of his players.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the negativity. I just don't like roasting someone before they've had a chance to succeed. Very weird.

Seems like he has had a chance to succeed but has failed. How has our DLine been since he’s been here in metrics like sacks, qB hurries and hits, tackles for loss and things like getting off the field on third down? HORRIBLE. So you won’t blame PC because it’s KNJ right? You won’t blame KNJ because well it’s PC And you won’t blame Hurtt because it is either KNJ or PC. Some of you ahs will never hold ANY coach accountable for ANYTHING. Bunch of clowns.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,932
Reaction score
2,369
RockinHawks":1nuf8ede said:
Isn't Pete the Head Coach, and shouldn't be be "running the show?" I mean, that's what a head coach does. He implements his plan and hires coaches to support that. An OC and DC will bring some of their ideas to the table, run some of their schemes, etc., but it's not like the head coach DOESN'T run the team the way he wants...otherwise, Pete wouldn't be a very good head coach.

I really liked what K.J. had to say about a head coach and coordinators... it starts with PERSONNEL. If you don't have the players, then it really won't matter what scheme you're running. Pete needs better players... some years it comes together, some years it doesn't. We're getting a fresh mind to run the defense, and bringing in other Fangio disciples to tweak the gameplan and get hopefully get some success pressuring the QB and getting more turnovers. Let's see what free agency and the draft bring us.

Hurtt has done NOTHING to warrant the negative criticism, or being labeled a "yes man," he's a quality coach who is young and has the respect of his players.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the negativity. I just don't like roasting someone before they've had a chance to succeed. Very weird.

I view the weirdness as anarchy at work lashing out and attacking that which it doesn't understand.
 

Yxes1122

Active member
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
498
Reaction score
214
JayhawkMike":365m792i said:
RockinHawks":365m792i said:
Isn't Pete the Head Coach, and shouldn't be be "running the show?" I mean, that's what a head coach does. He implements his plan and hires coaches to support that. An OC and DC will bring some of their ideas to the table, run some of their schemes, etc., but it's not like the head coach DOESN'T run the team the way he wants...otherwise, Pete wouldn't be a very good head coach.

I really liked what K.J. had to say about a head coach and coordinators... it starts with PERSONNEL. If you don't have the players, then it really won't matter what scheme you're running. Pete needs better players... some years it comes together, some years it doesn't. We're getting a fresh mind to run the defense, and bringing in other Fangio disciples to tweak the gameplan and get hopefully get some success pressuring the QB and getting more turnovers. Let's see what free agency and the draft bring us.

Hurtt has done NOTHING to warrant the negative criticism, or being labeled a "yes man," he's a quality coach who is young and has the respect of his players.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the negativity. I just don't like roasting someone before they've had a chance to succeed. Very weird.

Seems like he has had a chance to succeed but has failed. How has our DLine been since he’s been here in metrics like sacks, qB hurries and hits, tackles for loss and things like getting off the field on third down? HORRIBLE. So you won’t blame PC because it’s KNJ right? You won’t blame KNJ because well it’s PC And you won’t blame Hurtt because it is either KNJ or PC. Some of you ahs will never hold ANY coach accountable for ANYTHING. Bunch of clowns.

No amount of coaching will turn Benson Mayowa into Cliff Avril, Rasheem Green into Michael Bennett, or Darrell Taylor into Chris Clemons.

More than that, Seattle's use of Bear Fronts in 2020 and early 2021 impacted rush angles. There's a reason we didn't hear Dunlap's name much in the early part of the season but did later in the season.

You can only do so much when you don't have rushers that can consistently win one-on-ones. All coaching can do is try to mitigate the lack of talent on the DL. Seattle's been struggling to replace their rushers for years and that falls squarely on the Personnel Department (Looking right at the 2019 Draft when Seattle passed on Montez Sweat and Maxx Crosby).

Listening to Dugar's podcast with Clint Hurtt and listening to him Mic'd Up at practice will give you insight into who Hurtt is. He seems like a sharp guy who also gets a lot of respect from the men in that building.

And more than anything, Seattle's defense did good things last year while being absolutely marred by injury and turnover in the secondary. There are things to improve and carry forward. It makes a lot of sense to have Clint be the one to carry that forward while adding Donatell (and potentially Desai) to build on the Fangio style principles we saw added late last year.

Let's not forget that Clint comes from the Fangio tree.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,434
Reaction score
12,655
Location
Delaware
JayhawkMike":qrdy5owv said:
RockinHawks":qrdy5owv said:
Isn't Pete the Head Coach, and shouldn't be be "running the show?" I mean, that's what a head coach does. He implements his plan and hires coaches to support that. An OC and DC will bring some of their ideas to the table, run some of their schemes, etc., but it's not like the head coach DOESN'T run the team the way he wants...otherwise, Pete wouldn't be a very good head coach.

I really liked what K.J. had to say about a head coach and coordinators... it starts with PERSONNEL. If you don't have the players, then it really won't matter what scheme you're running. Pete needs better players... some years it comes together, some years it doesn't. We're getting a fresh mind to run the defense, and bringing in other Fangio disciples to tweak the gameplan and get hopefully get some success pressuring the QB and getting more turnovers. Let's see what free agency and the draft bring us.

Hurtt has done NOTHING to warrant the negative criticism, or being labeled a "yes man," he's a quality coach who is young and has the respect of his players.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the negativity. I just don't like roasting someone before they've had a chance to succeed. Very weird.

Seems like he has had a chance to succeed but has failed. How has our DLine been since he’s been here in metrics like sacks, qB hurries and hits, tackles for loss and things like getting off the field on third down? HORRIBLE. So you won’t blame PC because it’s KNJ right? You won’t blame KNJ because well it’s PC And you won’t blame Hurtt because it is either KNJ or PC. Some of you ahs will never hold ANY coach accountable for ANYTHING. Bunch of clowns.

Does this point to coaching or personnel?

Seems to me like if you actually look at the situation, the defensive line has been coached pretty damn well. Frank Clark regressed once leaving, every defensive tackle overperformed here, and they're always very good at run defense.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,932
Reaction score
2,369
Maelstrom787":24cgep0u said:
JayhawkMike":24cgep0u said:
RockinHawks":24cgep0u said:
Isn't Pete the Head Coach, and shouldn't be be "running the show?" I mean, that's what a head coach does. He implements his plan and hires coaches to support that. An OC and DC will bring some of their ideas to the table, run some of their schemes, etc., but it's not like the head coach DOESN'T run the team the way he wants...otherwise, Pete wouldn't be a very good head coach.

I really liked what K.J. had to say about a head coach and coordinators... it starts with PERSONNEL. If you don't have the players, then it really won't matter what scheme you're running. Pete needs better players... some years it comes together, some years it doesn't. We're getting a fresh mind to run the defense, and bringing in other Fangio disciples to tweak the gameplan and get hopefully get some success pressuring the QB and getting more turnovers. Let's see what free agency and the draft bring us.

Hurtt has done NOTHING to warrant the negative criticism, or being labeled a "yes man," he's a quality coach who is young and has the respect of his players.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the negativity. I just don't like roasting someone before they've had a chance to succeed. Very weird.

Seems like he has had a chance to succeed but has failed. How has our DLine been since he’s been here in metrics like sacks, qB hurries and hits, tackles for loss and things like getting off the field on third down? HORRIBLE. So you won’t blame PC because it’s KNJ right? You won’t blame KNJ because well it’s PC And you won’t blame Hurtt because it is either KNJ or PC. Some of you ahs will never hold ANY coach accountable for ANYTHING. Bunch of clowns.

Does this point to coaching or personnel?

Seems to me like if you actually look at the situation, the defensive line has been coached pretty damn well. Frank Clark regressed once leaving, every defensive tackle overperformed here, and they're always very good at run defense.

Perhaps someone can shed some light on Damione Lewis ..... Defensive Assistant/Defensive Line. We do know he was an a defensive tackle in his playing days. And he had a hand in helping two former rookie free agents develop into excellent pro tackles. And it will be interesting to learn how his responsibilities might change as a consequence of Hurtt's promotion.
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,009
Reaction score
9,108
Location
Cockeysville, Md
Maelstrom787":3qp5uzei said:
JayhawkMike":3qp5uzei said:
RockinHawks":3qp5uzei said:
Isn't Pete the Head Coach, and shouldn't be be "running the show?" I mean, that's what a head coach does. He implements his plan and hires coaches to support that. An OC and DC will bring some of their ideas to the table, run some of their schemes, etc., but it's not like the head coach DOESN'T run the team the way he wants...otherwise, Pete wouldn't be a very good head coach.

I really liked what K.J. had to say about a head coach and coordinators... it starts with PERSONNEL. If you don't have the players, then it really won't matter what scheme you're running. Pete needs better players... some years it comes together, some years it doesn't. We're getting a fresh mind to run the defense, and bringing in other Fangio disciples to tweak the gameplan and get hopefully get some success pressuring the QB and getting more turnovers. Let's see what free agency and the draft bring us.

Hurtt has done NOTHING to warrant the negative criticism, or being labeled a "yes man," he's a quality coach who is young and has the respect of his players.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the negativity. I just don't like roasting someone before they've had a chance to succeed. Very weird.

Seems like he has had a chance to succeed but has failed. How has our DLine been since he’s been here in metrics like sacks, qB hurries and hits, tackles for loss and things like getting off the field on third down? HORRIBLE. So you won’t blame PC because it’s KNJ right? You won’t blame KNJ because well it’s PC And you won’t blame Hurtt because it is either KNJ or PC. Some of you ahs will never hold ANY coach accountable for ANYTHING. Bunch of clowns.

Does this point to coaching or personnel?

Seems to me like if you actually look at the situation, the defensive line has been coached pretty damn well. Frank Clark regressed once leaving, every defensive tackle overperformed here, and they're always very good at run defense.

Probably some of both, but for sure personnel, and also, according to KJ (who would know), an attempt to actually change the way we play defense. That would seem to fly a bit in the face of the mantra that we just do the same old thing every year. In reality, the defensive scheme is one that is in a bit if a transition and one without its share of missteps as they retool on the fly.

But I agree, Poona, Woods, Green to a degree, Taylor... they've all excelled under Hurtt. But it's obvious we were missing a pretty significant interior rush piece last year and chose to ride it out rather than devoting resources like Adams to compensate. They also went in a man down late last year with Aldon unable to play.

I'll reserve judgment on Hurtt but don't disagree with surrounding a young mind with experienced mentors around him. I just thought they might bring that young guy in from outside. The desire to mix in Fangio's approach is obvious though.
 

sdog1981

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,367
Reaction score
240
Hurtt is 43, the same age as Bradley when he was hired in 2009. I did not think he was that young.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,932
Reaction score
2,369
sdog1981":34fm90l5 said:
Hurtt is 43, the same age as Bradley when he was hired in 2009. I did not think he was that young.

Hurtt's assistant Damione Lewis is also 43 years young.
 

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
8,985
Reaction score
2,648
Aros":2ip1n6en said:
I'm having a nice crust-less quiche tonight. Should be delicious. What is on everyone's menu tonight?
Pictures?Like our departed Pmedic used to provide :lol:
(food and chicken)
 
Top