MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 18,575
- Reaction score
- 1,510
I see double moves on Brandon Browner in the future.
theENGLISHseahawk":jenft7ts said:Falcons are a lot better than the Redskins. Not even close.
MontanaHawk05":a9wxlh3e said:I see double moves on Brandon Browner in the future.
theENGLISHseahawk":ou1wwhpk said:Falcons are a lot better than the Redskins. Not even close.
nanomoz":19zhdrnr said:theENGLISHseahawk":19zhdrnr said:Falcons are a lot better than the Redskins. Not even close.
For sure.
That said, I feel better about this matchup than the matchup against th Skins. I wasn't nearly as confident as most on these boards.
Torris":2xm0xyxc said:Fox0r":2xm0xyxc said:Falcons have been chokers in the playoffs lately and still have yet to get that monkey off their backs. Also, the Falcons strike me as a soft offense that won't take being punched in the mouth well.
These aren't the same Falcons as before. I guess you could say the same about the Hawks since they finally learned how to win a road playoff game, but they won't beat the Falcons in the GA Dome. I don't even remember the last time the Hawks beat the Falcons at all. Even at Century Link.
I agree. In fact, the Atlanta defense, while ranked 12th, is rated at -2.9%. That's just a hair above middling. While much better than the Skins defense, it's not nearly as impressive as, say, San Frans or Chicago's. On offense they also rank 12th, compared to Washington, which ranked 6th. Atlanta's 6.1% doesn't compare to Green Bay or New England, both of whom we were able to keep in check.hawksfan515":1pimuw81 said:OK really how do you guys think the Falcons are good? I know, I will just sound like some mindless follower.... But I really respect Football Outsiders rankings.
This is the final regular season rankings.
Atlanta is #10, Washington is #9. Their rankings are fairly accurate.
Not sure how you get the opinion that Atlanta is miles better.
SeaWolv":a91mo4a6 said:theENGLISHseahawk":a91mo4a6 said:Falcons are a lot better than the Redskins. Not even close.
I dunno, I'm not convinced. The easiest schedule in the league and only signature wins against the Broncos, Redskins, Giants, and Saints. The last two I'm not sure how signature they are. They lost to the Bucs, Panthers and Saints. They ay be better than the Redskins but I question that they're "a lot better".
theENGLISHseahawk":1oibadxe said:SeaWolv":1oibadxe said:theENGLISHseahawk":1oibadxe said:Falcons are a lot better than the Redskins. Not even close.
I dunno, I'm not convinced. The easiest schedule in the league and only signature wins against the Broncos, Redskins, Giants, and Saints. The last two I'm not sure how signature they are. They lost to the Bucs, Panthers and Saints. They ay be better than the Redskins but I question that they're "a lot better".
You can only beat the teams on the schedule. For what it's worth, I watched most of their loss to Carolina and Newton just had an insane performance. Their other defeat was in New Orleans and Brees had a major day. Then there was the throw away week 17 loss to Tampa Bay.
Apart from that they won every single other game. They have a franchise quarterback, two stunning receivers, a hall of fame tight end and a solid, balanced defense. They play a brand of football which allows them to dominate a lot of games.
Now... I'm not saying they're flawless or we can't/won't win. Ryan had a five-pick game earlier this year (forget the game, maybe Arizona?) where he just looked poor. And if he can rattle him, it might happen again. But we're not exactly pressing many QB's this year and now we've lost our best pass rusher in Clemons to an ACL injury. We can run on their defense, but I suspect we'll have to keep up because they'll score points.
They are much richer in talent with more experience across the board than Washington. In all honesty, the only thing holding people back making them a likely SB finalist is the fact they've bottled it the last two years in the playoffs. Well, eventually that run will end. They're too good a team for it not to.
The one thing that concerns me about the Falcons is theyre at home and can put quick points on you. But having said that, we are a lot better than we were a few months ago and we have confidence and momentum. The Falcons played great this season and were rewarded with a bye. They could be rusty.theENGLISHseahawk":8it01coo said:Falcons are a lot better than the Redskins. Not even close.
Torris":343iiklx said:Fox0r":343iiklx said:Falcons have been chokers in the playoffs lately and still have yet to get that monkey off their backs. Also, the Falcons strike me as a soft offense that won't take being punched in the mouth well.
These aren't the same Falcons as before. I guess you could say the same about the Hawks since they finally learned how to win a road playoff game, but they won't beat the Falcons in the GA Dome. I don't even remember the last time the Hawks beat the Falcons at all. Even at Century Link.