HunnyBadger
New member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 540
- Reaction score
- 0
Is there any info on Breno's knee? I want Breno on the team, but is his knee a chronic concern?
E.C. Laloosh":ucpav1kd said:themunn":ucpav1kd said:I got as far as Doug Baldwin 2nd round and the 49ers making a move.
Doug Baldwin moving to SF is as likely as Jacksonville winning the superbowl. I will continue to read. Interesting so far
I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the idea. I've even read some Niner fans posting to the effect that they'd like to see it happen.
smerfy01":35r1pwdz said:Mrob is probably gone...honestly I hope he retires. Love that guy. It's time to move on though, with his production down and he's on the wrong side of his career :/
49thHawk":3pddp238 said:There are changes that will be required due to contract situations and other reasons but we'll see how much change there will be overall.
Pete keeps signalling there won't be a lot of changes:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -seahawks/
But, looking back to what Schneider and Pete have done in past offseasons, I can't but feel they'll be active again this offseason. Maybe it will be more about tinkering than overhaulling. I see us losing a WR and adding another. Same with DL. I think they will do something more signifigant with the OL. It's the glaring need and they have been good about addressing needs in the offseason.
DavidSeven":cuaw72k8 said:I think they figure out an extension with Earl and Sherm. I can see them letting Tate walk, even at a discount. I just have a hard time believing that they'd want to lock themselves into a diminutive receiving corps for the next three years. Passing is arguably the least important aspect of this team and yet people seem to want to dump millions in cap on it. I just don't see it happening.
49thHawk":2t7btwa6 said:There are changes that will be required due to contract situations and other reasons but we'll see how much change there will be overall.
Pete keeps signalling there won't be a lot of changes:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -seahawks/
But, looking back to what Schneider and Pete have done in past offseasons, I can't but feel they'll be active again this offseason. Maybe it will be more about tinkering than overhaulling. I see us losing a WR and adding another. Same with DL. I think they will do something more signifigant with the OL. It's the glaring need and they have been good about addressing needs in the offseason.
DavidSeven":19f6oxwf said:I think they figure out an extension with Earl and Sherm. I can see them letting Tate walk, even at a discount. I just have a hard time believing that they'd want to lock themselves into a diminutive receiving corps for the next three years. Passing is arguably the least important aspect of this team and yet people seem to want to dump millions in cap on it. I just don't see it happening.
SDHawk":1d6kt9hc said:DavidSeven":1d6kt9hc said:I think they figure out an
extension with Earl and Sherm. I can see them letting Tate walk, even at a discount. I just have a hard time believing that they'd want to lock themselves into a diminutive receiving corps for the next three years. Passing is arguably the least important aspect of this team and yet people seem to want to dump millions in cap on it. I just don't see it happening.
I think the broader offensive philosophy is to get explosive results out of low risk plays. That means explosive running either from the backfield or as a runner after the catch. Tate and Harvin are two of the best in the business with regard to the latter.
Mr.Hawkbrah":145mi54s said:SDHawk":145mi54s said:DavidSeven":145mi54s said:I think they figure out an extension with Earl and Sherm. I can see them letting Tate walk, even at a discount. I just have a hard time believing that they'd want to lock themselves into a diminutive receiving corps for the next three years. Passing is arguably the least important aspect of this team and yet people seem to want to dump millions in cap on it. I just don't see it happening.
I think the broader offensive philosophy is to get explosive results out of low risk plays. That means explosive running either from the backfield or as a runner after the catch. Tate and Harvin are two of the best in the business with regard to the latter.
Imo Davidseven is right. Your off season plan calls for locking up Tate and db, say what you want about our philosophy, I 100% believe you could switch out almost any other teams wr core and we still win that superbowl. Just cause our wrs are good, doesn't mean their aren't the least important piece of the puzzle. In order to win forever you must stay young and cheap, all I read on here is how we need to lock up almost everyone, it's not going to happen. And people will be leaving, I will eat my Crow when db and Tate are both on the roster after next year but I have no plans for bird on the menu.
I mean we got to the sb in a few years time. ... id say we should be excited for the new faces knowing how good of talent evaluators we have, yet everyone just seems scared of losing talent... Call me over confident I guess, just not worried about replacing our pedestrians, did you see Keases catch in the sb? Lol you guys are telling me you're that worried about him starting.... Talent Development is one of the coolest parts of being a fan and all I hear about monster and guys is no excitement and only pessimism.
DavidSeven":3fd381yc said:I see the long-term MUST HAVES as Russell, Earl, Sherm, Kam, Marshawn, and probably Percy. I only consider a player a MUST HAVE if they're unique and losing any one of them significantly changes your team. Imagine it this way: losing any of these guys in the middle of a game changes the entire dynamic of the game. I love what Bennett and Tate bring, but does their impact really rise to that level?
If they find a way to lock up Earl and Sherm (w/ room for Russell next year) and then draft well, then I think that's a win for the off-season. If they extend those guys AND somehow retain Bennett and Tate, then it's a home run -- just not sure if it's realistic.