Rainger
Well-known member
This experiment by PC is clearly not working. PC blew it when he started a Rookie over the much more experiened VETERAN Flynn. He really blew it with a 3 way competition and not giving Flynn the reps he needed to be great.
Just look at the terreible losses this Rookie has had on the road. His passes are sailing high. He cant see wide open recievers. He doesnt STAY in the pocket enough.
He has single handed lost the games in Arizona (couldnt get a TD at end of the game after he let Kolb drive the field), St Louis, (couldnt stop the fake field goal and the 2 60+ yard FG's), Detriot, (he didnt score enough TD's to allow the Defence to cave), Miami (ditto of Detriot). SF (well had he caught those dropped passes we would have won.) Flynn would not have allowed that to happen.
We are wasting this GREAT defense on starting a rookie.
If we continue with a rookie and not put in the VETERAN Flynn we have no chance the last 4 games.
Why cant PC see what so many experts on this site can see. Bench RW go with Flynn and we are guaranteed a SB.
:sarcasm_off: edited to make some happy
Just look at the terreible losses this Rookie has had on the road. His passes are sailing high. He cant see wide open recievers. He doesnt STAY in the pocket enough.
He has single handed lost the games in Arizona (couldnt get a TD at end of the game after he let Kolb drive the field), St Louis, (couldnt stop the fake field goal and the 2 60+ yard FG's), Detriot, (he didnt score enough TD's to allow the Defence to cave), Miami (ditto of Detriot). SF (well had he caught those dropped passes we would have won.) Flynn would not have allowed that to happen.
We are wasting this GREAT defense on starting a rookie.
If we continue with a rookie and not put in the VETERAN Flynn we have no chance the last 4 games.
Why cant PC see what so many experts on this site can see. Bench RW go with Flynn and we are guaranteed a SB.
:sarcasm_off: edited to make some happy