How far does this go?
Is cheating OK?
A little while ago in another thread, I mentioned that following the 2002 World Cup here in Brazil with friends and coworkers as one of the greatest times in my sports-fan life. The thing is that it didn't start so well. After Brazil's first group-phase game, against Turkey, I felt awful. That game should have been a 1-1 tie, but the refs awarded a total-BS penalty to Brazil because the forward Luizão took a dive in Turkey's penalty area really late in the game, and Brazil took an undeserved victory when Rivaldo converted the PK. I knew Brazil hadn't deserved to win, and it made me feel awful. It's nice that the team played well enough for the rest of the tournament to clearly deserve the title (not as clearly as in 1970, but still pretty damn clearly). But I felt terrible that my chosen team had won a game because Cuizão cheated.
What about dirty play?
I find Raiders fans disgusting because since I became aware of them in the 1970s, they not only didn't deny that the Raiders played dirty, they reveled in it. I find that disgusting.
There have been NFL players like Tatum, Romanowski, Schlereth, Burfict, and others who made careers out of ruining other players' careers with dirty plays. If those guys had been Seahawks, would you think that was as great as Raiders fans, for example, think it was that Tatum and Romanowski played that way? Tatum didn't just ruin Daryl Stingley's career. He paralyzed Stingley and ruined his life. If Tatum had been a Seahawk, would you revere him like Raiders fans do?
It seems to me that the essence of your comment is "just win, baby," and I've been against that Raiders $#!+ since before the Seahawks existed.