Poll: Leonard Williams trade

Your opinion on the trade?

  • Fair value

    Votes: 134 56.3%
  • Overpaid

    Votes: 102 42.9%
  • Underpaid

    Votes: 2 0.8%

  • Total voters
    238

BASF

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,841
Reaction score
2,472
Location
Tijuana/San Diego

This is our worst trade. Though I consider him borderline HoF, and not a lock as 68 seems to think.
 

JPatera76

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
6,334
Reaction score
4,758
I’m going to merge this in some other random Williams thread .. one of the MANY we have.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
5,402
Reaction score
1,935
He's a great player, but I voted 'over paid' because I don't feel he'll be kept. A 2nd and 5th for a half season rental is steep. If they somehow come to terms and keep him it'll make it more palatable for sure.
 

renofox

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
4,219
Reaction score
3,537
Location
Arizona

This is our worst trade. Though I consider him borderline HoF, and not a lock as 68 seems to think.
Green had a huge fumbling problem that Holmgren believed would never be corrected so he got almost no touches as a Seahawk. Holmgren despised TOs even more than PC did.

He dumped Green for what he could get. Green then improved his ball protection skills but continued to have fumble issues in Green Bay (per season his first five years in GB - 3, 5, 3, 7, 6).

His production far outweighed the fumbles in most people's minds, but Holmgren felt the opposite.
 

BASF

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,841
Reaction score
2,472
Location
Tijuana/San Diego
Green had a huge fumbling problem that Holmgren believed would never be corrected so he got almost no touches as a Seahawk. Holmgren despised TOs even more than PC did.

He dumped Green for what he could get. Green then improved his ball protection skills but continued to have fumble issues in Green Bay (per season his first five years in GB - 3, 5, 3, 7, 6).

His production far outweighed the fumbles in most people's minds, but Holmgren felt the opposite.
I am old enough to remember the debates back then about it. I didn't necessarily disagree with Holmgren regarding the fumbles, but Vinson was not a good CB and would not have moved the needle for us.
 

Parallax

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
460
Reaction score
456
If he’s not re-signed, this move was 100% a fail.
It's irrelevant whether he's re-signed. Could have signed him in the off season without giving up any picks. We got a ten game rental for a second and a fifth in a year where we weren't going anywhere anyway. In fact, we'd probably have higher picks had he not been there. Any wins he caused are meaningless. Was major malpractice to trade for him and, in my view, a more than fireable offense. A selfish and wasteful move by a head coach looking out primarily for himself. Should have stepped down a few years back rather than running the team like a spoiled, entitled kid running his own little football fiefdom. So glad Jody finally stepped in.
 

GemCity

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
2,679
Reaction score
3,100
It's irrelevant whether he's re-signed. Could have signed him in the off season without giving up any picks. We got a ten game rental for a second and a fifth in a year where we weren't going anywhere anyway. In fact, we'd probably have higher picks had he not been there. Any wins he caused are meaningless. Was major malpractice to trade for him and, in my view, a more than fireable offense. A selfish and wasteful move by a head coach looking out primarily for himself. Should have stepped down a few years back rather than running the team like a spoiled, entitled kid running his own little football fiefdom. So glad Jody finally stepped in.
The 2nd and 5th was steep. But, there’s zero guarantees that we could’ve signed him with anymore or any less confidence had he made it to the off-season.

Ultimately, I agree that it wasn’t a good move. But I also think him being here for the short time he was works in our favor.

The biggest question may not be if he prefers to stay or not… wth is he going to want $$$ wise.

Personal opinion…I’d prefer those picks back.
 

Parallax

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
460
Reaction score
456
The 2nd and 5th was steep. But, there’s zero guarantees that we could’ve signed him with anymore or any less confidence had he made it to the off-season.

Ultimately, I agree that it wasn’t a good move. But I also think him being here for the short time he was works in our favor.

The biggest question may not be if he prefers to stay or not… wth is he going to want $$$ wise.

Personal opinion…I’d prefer those picks back.
For me, that's a gross understatement. I'm pounding my fists over loss of that second and want to string someone up. The problem with the Hawks since the early days of the Carroll/Schneider era is failure to be efficient with draft picks and cap space.

The only way the trade could arguably be worth it is if Williams gave us a home-town discount. How likely is that? The man has been here less than one year and his first obligation is to his family and its long-term financial health.
 
OP
OP
seabowl

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
1,378
For me, that's a gross understatement. I'm pounding my fists over loss of that second and want to string someone up. The problem with the Hawks since the early days of the Carroll/Schneider era is failure to be efficient with draft picks and cap space.

The only way the trade could arguably be worth it is if Williams gave us a home-town discount. How likely is that? The man has been here less than one year and his first obligation is to his family and its long-term financial health.
100% agree. One thing though is they may get up to a 3rd round comp pick if he signs elsewhere
 

GemCity

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
2,679
Reaction score
3,100
For me, that's a gross understatement. I'm pounding my fists over loss of that second and want to string someone up. The problem with the Hawks since the early days of the Carroll/Schneider era is failure to be efficient with draft picks and cap space.

The only way the trade could arguably be worth it is if Williams gave us a home-town discount. How likely is that? The man has been here less than one year and his first obligation is to his family and its long-term financial health.
Hometown discount? Very unlikely. At this point in his career, I’m assuming he is going to want to get paid.

I’m only holding on to a glimmer of hope that he’s going to re-sign for a team friendly amount.

I agree though…bonehead move and we may see him playing elsewhere.
 

bigcc

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
1,666
Reaction score
452
It's irrelevant whether he's re-signed. Could have signed him in the off season without giving up any picks. We got a ten game rental for a second and a fifth in a year where we weren't going anywhere anyway. In fact, we'd probably have higher picks had he not been there. Any wins he caused are meaningless. Was major malpractice to trade for him and, in my view, a more than fireable offense. A selfish and wasteful move by a head coach looking out primarily for himself. Should have stepped down a few years back rather than running the team like a spoiled, entitled kid running his own little football fiefdom. So glad Jody finally stepped in.
We wouldn't have been able to sign him. He would have been tagged (might still be). We don't know if he was a rental yet, and if he was, we'll get a 3rd round comp. The wins he caused were meaningless because of draft picks? Come on you're smarter than that.

You also don't know where we were going, we were a missed field goal OR lock not being trash for one drive away from playing the bucs, and then playing a lions team we'd already beaten in Detroit.

That being said I wouldn't have made the trade, but I understand why they did, and I don't think it was a bad one, but not a good one either. C/C+

Value was fair 2/5 for leonard and 3(comp) or tag rights.... He's a monster and idl like that don't grow on trees,i think whether it was a good/bad/whatever trade is much more debatable than if we over/underpaid for him.
 

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
1,006
Location
Sequim
He was much needed to stop the run. Actually, we need another run stopper on the DL. He earned his money. It was a fair trade.
 
Last edited:

GemCity

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
2,679
Reaction score
3,100
We wouldn't have been able to sign him. He would have been tagged (might still be). We don't know if he was a rental yet, and if he was, we'll get a 3rd round comp. The wins he caused were meaningless because of draft picks? Come on you're smarter than that.

You also don't know where we were going, we were a missed field goal OR lock not being trash for one drive away from playing the bucs, and then playing a lions team we'd already beaten in Detroit.

That being said I wouldn't have made the trade, but I understand why they did, and I don't think it was a bad one, but not a good one either. C/C+

Value was fair 2/5 for leonard and 3(comp) or tag rights.... He's a monster and idl like that don't grow on trees,i think whether it was a good/bad/whatever trade is much more debatable than if we over/underpaid for him.
Much better than how I put it.
💯
 

bigcc

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
1,666
Reaction score
452
He was much needed to stop the run. Actually, we need another run stopper on the DL. He earner his money. It was a fair trade.
Not just the run, he was our best pass rusher outside of mafe, and that's debatable when you consider the double teams and higher difficulty of rushing inside.

Really hope we can keep him. If it comes down I'd cut dre'mont first, man that was a terrible signing, if only they could trade contracts (or the lack of)
 
Last edited:

Parallax

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
460
Reaction score
456
We wouldn't have been able to sign him. He would have been tagged (might still be). We don't know if he was a rental yet, and if he was, we'll get a 3rd round comp. The wins he caused were meaningless because of draft picks? Come on you're smarter than that.

You also don't know where we were going, we were a missed field goal OR lock not being trash for one drive away from playing the bucs, and then playing a lions team we'd already beaten in Detroit.

That being said I wouldn't have made the trade, but I understand why they did, and I don't think it was a bad one, but not a good one either. C/C+

Value was fair 2/5 for leonard and 3(comp) or tag rights.... He's a monster and idl like that don't grow on trees,i think whether it was a good/bad/whatever trade is much more debatable than if we over/underpaid for him.
Could not disagree more. Heck, the Cowboys were offering a second for Thomas when he was still a great safety and we kept holding out for a first. Any comp, if we get one, will be end of the third round. The wins this year were absolutely meaningless. If we had made the playoffs, we'd have been out in the Wildcard round. If we miraculously survived that, we'd have been destroyed in the next game. No way we were beating Detroit again. We caught them early and they weren't ready for us, since we had looked so bad against the Rams. They'd have crushed us.

One of the dumbest trades of the Carroll era and that's saying a lot, given how many clunkers we've seen. We had one great trade, and Pete was forced into it because Russ made clear he wasn't signing another contract. It's clear Schneider was ready to let him go A LOT sooner.
 

12forlife

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
765
Reaction score
525
If we can sign Williams to a 3-4 year extension then this is a fair trade.
There is some solid DLine in this class, but honestly I prefer Williams over whose available in the draft simply because of M/M, I believe he will have Williams become this team's Michael Bennett! I can see him moving Williams all up & down the line. Jones & Williams could be in for Monster '24
 

Latest posts

Top