Russell Wilson meme thread

BlueTalon

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
9,081
Reaction score
1,837
Location
Eastern Washington
He is a hall of famer for gods sake it’s not even a question.
Nah. He legit had a chance to play himself INTO the Hall of Fame. He switched teams, got exactly the situation he wanted, helped to create the offense with a coaching staff he considered himself "partners" with. He had all the input he ever asked for. If there was ever a time to showcase his HOF credentials, it was his first season with the Broncos. Let Russ Cook!

And he faceplanted. He faceplanted hard. He burnt the toast, and scorched the pot when he tried to boil water. For a while, it was easy to blame his rookie head coach Hackett. And sure, Hackett did himself no favors. Remember what happened in game 2 last year? the crowd counting down the play clock? It happened again this year, only this year Hackett wasn't the coach, it was the great Sean Payton. Interesting, how that problem seemed to persist.

If Russ had lit it up in his first year in Denver, he'd be as close as he could be to a lock for HOF. But he didn't. Not only that, but Seattle did much better than expected with Pete and Geno. And that was after Me3 created the narrative that Pete was holding Russ back. Russ and his entourage were the ones who created the Pete vs. Russ narrative. They were the ones who set the stage for what happened last season. And what happened last season was that Pete & Geno shined, and Russ stunk.

Last year, he stunk with Hackett, and now he's stinking with Payton. Oh, he's getting his personal stats alright, but somehow his team isn't benefitting. Regardless, the narrative has shifted. The narrative now is that Russ didn't know how good he had it in Seattle, and that much/most of his success in Seattle is due to the coaches and team that surrounded him there. So yes, he could very well be playing himself out of the HOF.
 

FlyingGunHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2022
Messages
763
Reaction score
1,224
Honest question to the .net

If Hasselbeck in his prime and you put him on the 2013 and 2014 Seahawks teams, do they win the Super Bowl?

I've asked this question a few times to friends and their answers vary.
 

BlueTalon

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
9,081
Reaction score
1,837
Location
Eastern Washington
Honest question to the .net

If Hasselbeck in his prime and you put him on the 2013 and 2014 Seahawks teams, do they win the Super Bowl?

I've asked this question a few times to friends and their answers vary.
I believe so. Thinking back to the goal line interception, it's easy to imagine Hass saying the same thing to Marshawn that he did before the Beastquake run: "Go get 'em, Marshawn!"
 

AROS

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
19,147
Reaction score
8,070
Location
Sultan, WA
Honest question to the .net

If Hasselbeck in his prime and you put him on the 2013 and 2014 Seahawks teams, do they win the Super Bowl?

I've asked this question a few times to friends and their answers vary.

In my mind, 100%.

With Lynch as his RB? That legendary defense? Absolutely. No doubt in my mind.
 

Film12Hawk

Active member
Joined
Aug 22, 2023
Messages
118
Reaction score
133
Honest question to the .net

If Hasselbeck in his prime and you put him on the 2013 and 2014 Seahawks teams, do they win the Super Bowl?

I've asked this question a few times to friends and their answers vary.

Without a doubt. It's easy to forget how pinpoint accurate he was. He didn't have the most consistent receivers as having to throw to Darrell Jackson and Koren Robinson isn't exactly going to inspire fear on the opposition. Bobby Engram too. He only had one season of over 1,000 yards. They had so many drops during Matt's prime. Take 2004 alone when that number was 41. This was second in the league. He also didn't really have a consistent TE until John Carlson one could argue. With Zach Miller (a natural receiver while still with the Raiders but was a better run blocker for us since RW can't see down the middle of the field), Doug Baldwin, Golden Tate, Jermaine Kearse, and Sidney Rice I think he could've done special things.
 
Last edited:

knownone

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
5,303
Reaction score
2,255
The greatest obstacle to Russell's HoF case is Kirk Cousins. They were drafted the same year: Russ went into an ideal situation, Cousins into a terrible one. They have nearly identical per-game stats. And unless Russ has a career resurgence, Kirk will likely pass him in career stats despite not becoming a full-time start until his fourth season.

If they swapped places in 2012, what changes? We didn't really have ammunition to answer that question until Russ joined the Broncos. Now, it's much easier to say Russ was the product of Seattle rather than the driving force.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,718
Reaction score
1,750
Location
Roy Wa.
Honest question to the .net

If Hasselbeck in his prime and you put him on the 2013 and 2014 Seahawks teams, do they win the Super Bowl?

I've asked this question a few times to friends and their answers vary.
We may have had three, the year we lost to Atlanta may have been a win also with Hass, he had that same drive as the rest of the team and not the stand offish personality of Wilson. Guys loved playing for and with him.
 

chrispy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
1,141
Honest question to the .net

If Hasselbeck in his prime and you put him on the 2013 and 2014 Seahawks teams, do they win the Super Bowl?

I've asked this question a few times to friends and their answers vary.
The recent KJ/ADB podcast enlightened an aspect relevant to this question. ADB had close to 0 (1 or 2, I can't remember) targets that entire game. He insisted he was open on every play. Maybe. Maybe not. DRevis followed ADB most of the game:#1DB v #1WR. Russ never went to Baldwin. I'd interpret that as protecting the ball because he was scared of Revis.

Hass would not DQ DBaldwin just because he was on Revis island. With that change alone, the game might have a turnover earlier, but DBaldwin would also have 5 or 6 catches for 75 yds and 3 or more 3rd down conversions. Baldwin would have been the target in the end zone on a pass play or Hass would have just handed it off. It would have been a very different game, but I believe it would have looked similar to the the previous year's Championship game if Hass, TJack or Geno were playing instead of RCW.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
10,023
Reaction score
1,718
Location
Sammamish, WA
We may have had three, the year we lost to Atlanta may have been a win also with Hass, he had that same drive as the rest of the team and not the stand offish personality of Wilson. Guys loved playing for and with him.
Russ wasn’t the reason the Seahawks lost to Atlanta. The defense didn’t hold up their end late in that game when the Seahawks took a 28-27 lead. Russ was one of the reasons they were in the playoffs in the first place. The prior year with TJack they finished 7-9 ended the season on a 2 game losing streak and missing the playoffs. That was with Lynch and LOB on the team.
 

Palmegranite

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
1,747
Reaction score
591
Location
CAN
I think the kind of beard Fitzpatrick has is silly-lookin', but I don't see how that's relevant to the weight we should give Fitzpatrick's opinion on NFL quarterbacks....
All I'm sayin' is that in spite of his Southern Fried beard, Ryan Fitzpatrick would've gotten kicked out of ZZ Top for throwing too many picks..
 

BlueTalon

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
9,081
Reaction score
1,837
Location
Eastern Washington
Russ wasn’t the reason the Seahawks lost to Atlanta. The defense didn’t hold up their end late in that game when the Seahawks took a 28-27 lead. Russ was one of the reasons they were in the playoffs in the first place. The prior year with TJack they finished 7-9 ended the season on a 2 game losing streak and missing the playoffs. That was with Lynch and LOB on the team.
Yes and no. If the offense puts up more points in the first half, the back end of the game plays out differently.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
10,023
Reaction score
1,718
Location
Sammamish, WA
Yes and no. If the offense puts up more points in the first half, the back end of the game plays out differently.
They had a rough 1st half but wasn’t all on Russ. I recall a Lynch fumble on their end of the field. Russ still threw for 385 yards that day and had a rating of 109.1

 

ivotuk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
23,117
Reaction score
1,840
Location
North Pole, Alaska
Honest question to the .net

If Hasselbeck in his prime and you put him on the 2013 and 2014 Seahawks teams, do they win the Super Bowl?

I've asked this question a few times to friends and their answers vary.
Yes. Russell was still young then, and didn't have Hass' experience. There was always the chance Matthew could have hurt himself running out of bounds though...
 

FlyingGunHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2022
Messages
763
Reaction score
1,224
Yes. Russell was still young then, and didn't have Hass' experience. There was always the chance Matthew could have hurt himself running out of bounds though...

Those pesky abdominal sprains. Running out of bounds really get to you after a while. :)
 

rcaido

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
2,213
Reaction score
491
The greatest obstacle to Russell's HoF case is Kirk Cousins. They were drafted the same year: Russ went into an ideal situation, Cousins into a terrible one. They have nearly identical per-game stats. And unless Russ has a career resurgence, Kirk will likely pass him in career stats despite not becoming a full-time start until his fourth season.

If they swapped places in 2012, what changes? We didn't really have ammunition to answer that question until Russ joined the Broncos. Now, it's much easier to say Russ was the product of Seattle rather than the driving force.

I like Kirk but they are not even close. Kirk only has one playoff win and most of his stats were garbage time because he was trailing most games. Very similar to Stafford before he went to the Rams. Stafford though was able to get a ring but he did everything he could to lose that superbowl. I dont really see any other QB competing against Wilson during his era.

If Wilson continues to produce, which is a big if, he might get the all time rushing leader. He is currently #2 all time in Passer Rating. Might crack top 10 all time in TD's too. This if he plays for 3 or 4 more years.
 

knownone

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
5,303
Reaction score
2,255
I like Kirk but they are not even close. Kirk only has one playoff win and most of his stats were garbage time because he was trailing most games. Very similar to Stafford before he went to the Rams. Stafford though was able to get a ring but he did everything he could to lose that superbowl. I dont really see any other QB competing against Wilson during his era.

If Wilson continues to produce, which is a big if, he might get the all time rushing leader. He is currently #2 all time in Passer Rating. Might crack top 10 all time in TD's too. This if he plays for 3 or 4 more years.
I wasn't comparing their career accolades. Obviously, Russ has more playoff wins. My point was that Russell's failing outside of Seattle would open up the Kirk Cousins hypothetical. Basically: what would their careers look like if Russ went to the Commanders and Kirk went to the Seahawks? Or to use something measurable, what do their careers look like post-LoB?

Since 2017—the first year Russ didn't have a top 5 defense—Russ and Kirk's stats, playoff accomplishments, and wins are virtually identical. If Russ doesn't turn his career around in Denver (or elsewhere), Cousins will likely catch him in everything but Passer Rating, which would still be comparatively close. The only reason there is a significant gap in career stats currently is because Russ has played 31 more games.
 

FlyingGunHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2022
Messages
763
Reaction score
1,224
Russ isn't doing much to help with Win/loss record as a starter in Denver either. 4-13 as a starter there so far. Which is bewildering compared to how much winning he did in Seattle. Its quite telling how good of a team he was on while here. Things just worked. Until they didn't.
 

strohmin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
1,873
Reaction score
1,023
Honest question to the .net

If Hasselbeck in his prime and you put him on the 2013 and 2014 Seahawks teams, do they win the Super Bowl?

I've asked this question a few times to friends and their answers vary.
oh I a 100% believe Matt wins us 2 superbowls. I feel like you could put a Kirk Cousins and he would do the same. You may think Kirk Cousins is a bad qb but I think he is a decent QB without an ego which is all we needed. He wouldn't need to do much other than utilize all the offensive weapons we had and we had some pretty damn good weapons.
 

Latest posts

Top