http://www.seahawks.com/videos-photos/v ... 0a0a8f9b9c
the more I like him :th2thumbs: :thirishdrinkers: :0190l: :179422:
the more I like him :th2thumbs: :thirishdrinkers: :0190l: :179422:
CANHawk":2sptcoya said:Gus is going to be a Head Coach someday.
grizbob":2g8smqiu said:CANHawk":2g8smqiu said:Gus is going to be a Head Coach someday.
Yup, in my perfect world scenario, It will be after PC's 2 Super Bowl wins and he retires :th2thumbs:
bestfightstory":1v6loflz said:grizbob":1v6loflz said:CANHawk":1v6loflz said:Gus is going to be a Head Coach someday.
Yup, in my perfect world scenario, It will be after PC's 2 Super Bowl wins and he retires :th2thumbs:
Y'know.... Not to create/promote infighting, but I think it is Gos or Cable who is next up.
In a perfect world, the Seahawks create new paradigm and have co-head coaches.
That's a marriage I would endorse.
pehawk":1gvj3h5l said:Thank goodness Cable likes to beat the shi out of coaches and women allegedly; its the only reason he wasn't gobbled up right after Al fired him. In Cable's defense, you should be able to deck whomever if you can create a rushing attack as he did in Oakland and now Seattle. He's EARNED the right to deck fools. Come to think of it, I like to think Cable's knocked Bevell around a few times.
And Can, I remember 95% of the yahoos on this board wanted Bradley gone. But they only posted that in between Dilfer and Charlie chants.
Aros":2nd6phe7 said:FIRE GUS BRADLEY!!!
Oh sorry, just a hiccup from 2010. Carry on.
Sports Hernia":cnhdhbfi said:pehawk":cnhdhbfi said:Thank goodness Cable likes to beat the shi out of coaches and women allegedly; its the only reason he wasn't gobbled up right after Al fired him. In Cable's defense, you should be able to deck whomever if you can create a rushing attack as he did in Oakland and now Seattle. He's EARNED the right to deck fools. Come to think of it, I like to think Cable's knocked Bevell around a few times.
And Can, I remember 95% of the yahoos on this board wanted Bradley gone. But they only posted that in between Dilfer and Charlie chants.
I'm still a yahoo that would like to see him gone. His play-calling gets way too passive at times, see 3rd and long situations where he plays the softzone, only rushes 3 and gives up a first down. I think the only weakness of the defense is the D coordinator.
I thought he'd "grow out of" his softzone tendencies, but he hasn't. Hopefully he will and soon.
Scottemojo":2stmuluw said:Bradley is about as much the actual DC as I am. Pete may try to be hands off, but no way that isn't actually his baby.
Sports Hernia":3cgubtxr said:pehawk":3cgubtxr said:Thank goodness Cable likes to beat the shi out of coaches and women allegedly; its the only reason he wasn't gobbled up right after Al fired him. In Cable's defense, you should be able to deck whomever if you can create a rushing attack as he did in Oakland and now Seattle. He's EARNED the right to deck fools. Come to think of it, I like to think Cable's knocked Bevell around a few times.
And Can, I remember 95% of the yahoos on this board wanted Bradley gone. But they only posted that in between Dilfer and Charlie chants.
I'm still a yahoo that would like to see him gone. His play-calling gets way too passive at times, see 3rd and long situations where he plays the softzone, only rushes 3 and gives up a first down. I think the only weakness of the defense is the D coordinator.
I thought he'd "grow out of" his softzone tendencies, but he hasn't. Hopefully he will and soon.
pehawk":2iinb4um said:Sports Hernia":2iinb4um said:pehawk":2iinb4um said:Thank goodness Cable likes to beat the shi out of coaches and women allegedly; its the only reason he wasn't gobbled up right after Al fired him. In Cable's defense, you should be able to deck whomever if you can create a rushing attack as he did in Oakland and now Seattle. He's EARNED the right to deck fools. Come to think of it, I like to think Cable's knocked Bevell around a few times.
And Can, I remember 95% of the yahoos on this board wanted Bradley gone. But they only posted that in between Dilfer and Charlie chants.
I'm still a yahoo that would like to see him gone. His play-calling gets way too passive at times, see 3rd and long situations where he plays the softzone, only rushes 3 and gives up a first down. I think the only weakness of the defense is the D coordinator.
I thought he'd "grow out of" his softzone tendencies, but he hasn't. Hopefully he will and soon.
I agree that its frustrating. But, alot of the situations, I'm especially thinking against Romo and Rogers, I gave credit to the opposing QB's. Romo especially played incredible that day. Bradford had 1 or 2 of those also.
MontanaHawk05":246c9h6l said:Everyone was ready to fire Bradley two years ago when he had nothing to work with. How times change!