Siouxhawk":2w673ok8 said:
joeshaney":2w673ok8 said:
Didn't read the entire thread but thought I'd chime in on the topic of Bevell.
We scored 3 points in the second half against a bad, dysfunctional team.
I do like what Lynch did but we already know that we can run the ball when we commit to it. Our issue has been the passing game. Our issue remains the passing game.
Bevell has to go. It isn't all on him. I'd even say that he has some good qualities. But we need a spark that he will not provide.
The spark comes from players executing. Bevell's role is to facilitate the talents of the players into a dynamic scheme that produces wins. He's accomplished that the last two years better than any if his peers. He is right where he needs to be.
LOL, funny.
Two thoughts.
Players who don't perform can be cut. If it is 100% on the players, than there would be no need to employ coaches. In other words, if were going to employ a coach they need to be held accountable.
Now, if you want to say the accountability lies in the fact that we've had success as a team than that makes sense. I happen to attribute our success to our historic defense and bruising running game (see Tom Cable/Assistant Head Coach/Running Game Coordinator).
But hey, maybe your right. Either coaches don't play a role in teaching execution or Darrell Bevell is the one responsible for our teams recent success. To each his own.