Woolen needs to be benched...

Appyhawk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 27, 2019
Messages
4,629
Reaction score
2,533
Location
Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montan
I think maybe lots of observers mistake CB pulling off a receiver as 'loafing" when it is by design due to expectations of oncoming over the top coverage which changes CB assignment duty.
My biggest gripe about Riq is his lack of enthusiasm for stopping the run. He seems to avoid direct contact, which is often the best way to get hurt.
 

Chukarhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
5,088
Reaction score
2,773
When you're too dumb to realize you actually legally changed your real name to a word that means you stink. Just LOL. Golf clap. He must have some real geniuses surrounding him too. How do you let your boy do that?
 

Hawkinaz

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
2,135
Reaction score
1,558
Location
Henry County, Virginia
Um, I want players who play hard but not stupid. I gave Brisker as an example of a guy who goes beyond “hard”. He recklessly throws his body into tackles, and knocks himself out as often as the other guy. He’s a damn good player, but not helping us when he’s always on injury report. That’s been the story of his career. This is what I’m saying with Riq. He wouldn’t survive long playing like Brisker.
Sounds like Jamal Adams
 

Hawkinaz

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
2,135
Reaction score
1,558
Location
Henry County, Virginia
Woolen is the prototypical cover 3 CB is very good in zone, if I was MM I would be looking at making a change in the near future
 

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
2,028
Reaction score
1,283
Location
Sequim
No, they're the same in pass defense and Spoon is better in run defense.
Not if you believe in statistics. My favorite statistic for pass defense is the percentage of completions allowed when targeted. Anything under 60% is excellent. Around 62-63% is “meh” average, and over 65% is not very good.
 

SeaWolv

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,814
Reaction score
1,157
Not if you believe in statistics. My favorite statistic for pass defense is the percentage of completions allowed when targeted. Anything under 60% is excellent. Around 62-63% is “meh” average, and over 65% is not very good.
I do believe in statistics and here are the ones I look at (PFF):

Witherspoon:
Witherspoon PFF 12224

Woolen:
Woolen PFF 12224
 

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
2,028
Reaction score
1,283
Location
Sequim
I do believe in statistics and here are the ones I look at (PFF):

Witherspoon:
View attachment 68391

Woolen:
View attachment 68392
Most of that is not the statistic I gave you. Look at their REC %. That’s it. It is the best stat for pass defense. The PFF “coverage” factors includes all kinds of other crap like (I assume) includes YAC. Since Spoon is the better tackler, that would elevate his “coverage” stat.

Jaylon Johnson is the Bears Pro Bowl corner with $76 million contract extension. He is CONSISTENTLY under 60% on that stat. Offensive coordinators all target our other corner for the last 3 years, because they don’t want to mess with Johnson.
 
Last edited:

SeaWolv

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,814
Reaction score
1,157
Most of that is not the statistic I gave you. Look at their REC %. That’s it. It is the best stat for pass defense. The PFF “coverage” factors includes all kinds of other crap like (I assume) includes YAC. Since Spoon is the better tackler, that would elevate his “coverage” stat.

Jaylon Johnson is the Bears Pro Bowl corner with $76 million contract extension. He is CONSISTENTLY under 60% on that stat. Offensive coordinators all target our other corner for the last 3 years, because they don’t want to mess with Johnson.
You can reject PFF scoring if you like but your method is not the only way to judge performance. Of course there are stats built into these PFF scores so to assume they aren't is misguided. YAC wouldn't be a stat used to evaluate CBs. Things like PBUs, INTs, tackles, sacks, etc. are absolutely part of those scores and then some. What PFF and your stats only method don't account for are things like leadership and attitude, which I would argue are almost as important.
 

Latest posts

Top