McGruff":218fh1ba said:
Perfundle":218fh1ba said:
Smellyman":218fh1ba said:
apparently after a replay reversal on the Rice catch too?
wtf was up with that. Seattle had to burn a TO?
Nah, that was the correct call. If the catch had been ruled as such and there were no review, the clock would still be running anyway.
Rice was not touched by a defender and rolled out of bound. Stoppage of the clock. No 10 second runoff or timeout required
This one confused me too. They can't be saying he completed the catch and stayed in bounds. Yet how else do they demand we burn a timeout or run the clock down. To clarify, I saw him complete the catch and roll out of bounds. The ball froze to Rice's body the moment it struck him, and as previously stated he roled oob untouched.
Till I read this thread, I was also confused about the non running down of the clock after we were penalized for offside at the end of the half. But thanks for the great explanation.
I agree RW made a mistake running the ball in that situation, also getting caught for the first fumble on our ten yard line was a reminder that he isn't Fran Tarkenton just yet. But his 3rd qtr "on the deck" pass to Zach Miller was world class, with zero chance of a pick off.
And as previously mentioned, not a hint of intentional grounding from the commentators.
I think it's fine to critique his performances, but it must surely be within the context of the fact that he is already a great leader, a game winner, and to top it off a great entertainer. One of those attributes makes him fun to watch, the other two lead to superbowls.