Mick063":2aeqpfwz said:
Here is a thought experiment.
In that particular game, let the Cardinal defense play the Cardinal offense. Let the Seattle defense play the Seattle offense.
I would bet the farm that the Seattle defense would allow the fewest points.
What makes this defensive performance so awe inspiring is that the Seattle offense made it so difficult for the defense. The defense was on the field for 45 freaking minutes because the offense couldn't make a freaking first down. Of course they are going to give up some yardage. The defense was gassed by halftime. Way more fatigued than the Arizona defense.
You have to go back to the Stan Gelbaugh days to find an offense that can't cross midfield or can't convert a third down.
That well rested Cardinal defense was a function of Seattle's horrid offense.
First, great defensive performance Sunday night.
Second, the bolded above is partially true. It's also true, as horrific as our offensive play was, the defense allowed two 9 play drives and a 15 play drive in the 1st half. Arizona gained 30+ yds on 7 of 14 drives in the game. Their ability to keep points off the board was truly astounding.
It seems to always be a theme that the offense is solely responsible for time of possession disparity, when, like most things football, it's a team effort.
Now we only ran 6+ plays 3 out of 13 times (this might be the worst offensive Seahawks performance I've ever seen) so the offense completely failed but the defense does have some control over how many plays they are out there as well.