What defense are the Seahawks actually running?

A-Dog

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,315
Reaction score
61
Looking at the snap counts from Pro Football Reference, it appears the Seahawks lined up almost entirely in Nickel. Woolen, Diggs, Love, and Wagner all played 100% of the defensive snaps.

Snap Counts by Personnel:
3-4-4 (three interior linemen, two off-ball linebackers): 6 (8%)
2-5-4 (two interior linemen, three off-ball linebackers) 10 (12%) [SEE EDIT]
2-4-5 (two interior linemen, two off-ball linebackers): 48 (59%)
2-3-6 (two interior linemen, one off-ball linebacker): 17 (21%)

EDIT: Just realized after re-watching parts of the game, there were downs when Wagner, Brooks, and Bush were all out there at the same time, which I didn't initially factor in to my calculations above (I didn't chart plays, I just counted up snaps by position). That personnel grouping may happen less once Adams is back. Regardless, the amount of times when three interior lineman were played together was minimal.

It's only one game against the Rams, but based on this, the preseason, and the offseason personnel moves, it doesn't really look the the Seahawks are a 3-4 team (or a traditional 4-3 team) in terms of personnel (not talking about positioning, alignment, etc). It appears they are playing mostly in nickel (2-4-5) on base downs, with some 2-5-4 thrown in against 12 personnel and dime (2-3-6) on 3rd and long. They really only played 3-4-4 on the Rams' last drive when they were running down the clock.

The lack of urgency to fill the NT (0-tech/1-tech) position makes more sense here - they don't need a huge 2-gapper in the middle for the majority of plays. The good news is they looked capable of playing decent run defense with this personnel grouping. The bad news is that it didn't seem to help much with pressure, coverage, or generating turnovers. Again, this is the first game of the season against the Rams, so all this comes with a grain of salt. Still, it gives us an even more clear idea of where they want to go with the defense, and where it will need to improve.

In terms of pressure, aside from getting better production from the front-4, one thing that will need to improve is blitzing. Whether it was a four-man rush with an OLB dropping into coverage, or bringing extra men, instant pressure was non-existent and Stafford never seemed fooled. Bobby managed 6 sacks last season but he was a non-factor in this game, and he's limited in coverage so the temptation is probably to use him as a the extra man in the pass rush more often than not. Bryant I think made one good play off of a blitz (the Rams tried a flea flicker) but was also generally ineffective.

Adams and Witherspoon, with their instincts and aggression, should help improve the blitz along with the overall talent level. One big question is whether Carroll and Hurt will wean themselves off of Wagner on likely passing downs. Taking Wagner and Bryant out for Adams and Witherspoon should help, and allows the defense to be more "multiple" and perhaps the results will start living up to the vision.

I think "multiple" generally means being able to play different alignments and coverages out of the same personnel, but in order to do that your personnel must also be "multiple" - able to play in different positions with different responsibilities. Interior linemen that can play the run and pass, and can potentially play either 1 or 2 gaps. Outside linebackers that can set the edge against the run, pass rush, AND occasionally cover. Safeties that can play in the box or deep. Nickel-safety hybrids, etc.

One-dimensional players limit this and players like Woods, Poona, Jefferson and Barton were seemingly let go in favor of players who hypothetically can play well vs both run or pass. Unfortunately at this point Bobby, aside from his ability to call the plays and get people lined up properly, looks more and more like a run down specialist. To be fair that's a needed talent, but for the defense to progress we may need to see Brooks and Adams eating into his snaps.

For this to happen, we need to see Adams and Witherspoon replacing Love and Bryant on base/mixed downs, and Bobby coming off for Love on obvious passing downs (with Adams moving into the nickel off-ball linebacker spot next to Brooks). With Brooks, Adams, and Witherspoon in and around the box behind the front four there's a lot of potential for blitzing along with better coverage talent on critical 3rd and long situations.

Again, it was just one game, but it will interesting to see how the defense evolves once all of the pieces are back and the system has had time to gel.
 
Last edited:

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,489
Reaction score
2,102
So far, a very ineffective one.

A defence incapable of adjusting in any fashion to plays that opponent are running over and over again. A defence where the DLine play has shown itself to be extraordinarily weak and one incapable of putting pressure on opposing QBs.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
29,971
Reaction score
6,219
Location
Kent, WA
For all the gnashing of teeth going on, one thing shows in the stats. The Seahawks were reasonably effective against the run. We held them to 92 yards total on 40 attempts. There were breakdowns here and there, but overall we held them to 2.3 yds/att.

Perhaps there was too much emphasis on run vs pass on D, because Stafford threw pretty much with impunity on us, but last year's chief complaint against the D did OK, at least.
 

flv2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
1,462
Reaction score
1,184
Location
Bournemouth, UK
Nickel with a hybrid 6 in front of the DBs was the base defense for every NFL team in 2022. I can't post yearly snap count totals from footballoutsiders dot com because that site has been abandoned.

Basically the front 6 needs 2 DL, 2 ILBs, and 2 'others'. Teams are looking for hybrid players who can play Edge plus either DT or coverage LB. It's not a simple DE, DT, 3-4, or 4-3 game.
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
9,634
Reaction score
4,227
For all the gnashing of teeth going on, one thing shows in the stats. The Seahawks were reasonably effective against the run. We held them to 92 yards total on 40 attempts. There were breakdowns here and there, but overall we held them to 2.3 yds/att.

Perhaps there was too much emphasis on run vs pass on D, because Stafford threw pretty much with impunity on us, but last year's chief complaint against the D did OK, at least.
They were for sure but I worry it was because they sold out and that allowed the passing attack to do what they wanted so not confident it means a ton moving forward. It’s early tho
 
OP
OP
A

A-Dog

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,315
Reaction score
61
Nickel with a hybrid 6 in front of the DBs was the base defense for every NFL team in 2022. I can't post yearly snap count totals from footballoutsiders dot com because that site has been abandoned.

Basically the front 6 needs 2 DL, 2 ILBs, and 2 'others'. Teams are looking for hybrid players who can play Edge plus either DT or coverage LB. It's not a simple DE, DT, 3-4, or 4-3 game.

In terms of % used I think you're right, although on base (running) downs (first downs, 2nd and short/medium) last year the Hawks I think played a more traditional 3-4 a significant amount. At least in this game two of the "others" were OLBs on 100% of the defensive snaps.

On Sunday they interestingly played a front 7 (with three off-ball LBs) when the Rams started drives with 12 personnel - which was interesting but probably not in the long-term plans with Adams coming back and ILB depth being limited.

I really wonder if the Dime package will get used more once Adams and Witherspoon are back - both have great instincts, anticipation, and aggression that could help both coverage and the pass rush, and even run defense.

Down the road I see this looking pretty intriguing as it gets the most talented and athleticism on the field (if you consider Wagner to be more of a run-down player):

Brown.............Nwosu...Jones...Reed...Mafe.............Woolen
........Witherspoon.............Brooks...........Adams
...........................Love
.............................................Diggs
 
OP
OP
A

A-Dog

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,315
Reaction score
61
It looks like they have an agenda. It can be frustratung to watch, but i think theyre intent on making this nickel heavy, DB centric approach work.

It makes sense in terms of where they've invested, and also in terms of how pass-happy the league has gotten. Talented young mobile QBs, lots of good WRs, not a ton of good OL coming out, and very few bell-cow running backs that stay with their teams long enough to establish a dominant RB-centric running attack. There will always be outliers but if you can't stop the pass-heavy teams you aren't going to be positioned well for the playoffs.
 
OP
OP
A

A-Dog

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,315
Reaction score
61
I don't know why OP composed that 10,000 word thesis when he could have just said this.
I had some thoughts, okay? :ROFLMAO:

I just think it's more interesting to explore things a bit rather than just making useless blanket statements like "they suck, fire Pete"
 

TheLegendOfBoom

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
3,401
Reaction score
1,608
Location
Westcoastin’
Carroll has graded Spoon a lot higher than the nose tackles/defensive tackles in this years draft.

We will see if it pays dividends down the road, but, very hard to continue to play great defense with a front 3 or 4 that is physically controlled by the offensive line.

We are going to be in for a long season.

Not sure how better it will get unless, Nwosu gets on a sack streak and Jarran Reed is able to push the pocket consistently…
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,489
Reaction score
2,102
So far we know diddly about Witherspoon other than he was good in college. For us he has failed to appear.

Early returns are incomplete but suspect.
 

Scout

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2021
Messages
1,513
Reaction score
1,938
First of all there a lot of teams that play this hybrid but the Hawks need to incorporate fire zone blitzes and more standup rusher at the line pre snap to make defenses guess where pressure is coming from. Hawks are too predictable at the moment and it is just pitch and catch in the middle of the field using trip bunches.

A good example is to watch how the Patriots play their nickel/3rd and long packages. They have a lot of safeties that can play in the box or space. They have OLBs that can also play in short coverage and they have a DL that can be a stand up rusher or play with his hand in the dirt.
 

Chawker

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
5,491
Reaction score
1,457
Location
corner of 30th & plum
He's (Pete) is tring to put another man back in coverage, which starts all the turmoil rollin. DBs get lazy in there coverage, and the middle safty is easily pulled out of position. Stopping the run is another issue. Teams are having fun breaking down our defense.

What was wrong with the good ol 4-3 defense ?
 

flv2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
1,462
Reaction score
1,184
Location
Bournemouth, UK
...What was wrong with the good ol 4-3 defense ?
If you put 11 personnel out on the field with Metcalf, Lockett, and JSN and the defense responded with a traditional 4-3 what offensive plays would you call?
 
Top