Seattle releases players

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
35,928
Reaction score
16,930
Location
Sammamish, WA
Just listening to it on 710. Saves 26 mil in cap space. Tip of the cap for them cutting bait on the mistake that was Dremont Jones.
I suspect Tyler will be next. Unless he takes a massive pay cut.
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
24,959
Reaction score
5,100
Location
Anchorage, AK
Biggest surprise is that Lockett isn’t one of them.

This group clears us approximately $27.25 million in cap space
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
35,928
Reaction score
16,930
Location
Sammamish, WA
27.5? Even better. They're saying 26 mil on 710. Mo money, mo money.

That being said, I can't help but think this is a set up for a new deal for a certain someone. Ugh
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
24,959
Reaction score
5,100
Location
Anchorage, AK
27.5? Even better. They're saying 26 mil on 710. Mo money, mo money.

That being said, I can't help but think this is a set up for a new deal for a certain someone. Ugh

I used OTC numbers and it came to $27,252,500. I rounded to 27.25. I assume OTC is fairly accurate.

As far as the reason behind it, this isn’t about extending anyone if that’s what you’re thinking. It could help get a deal with Jones or just a little space for other free agents. I’m sure there will be more moves coming soon enough.
 
Last edited:

JGreen79

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
1,197
Reaction score
198
Location
Newberg, Oregon
Good point. Totally separate if they do it. He's an all-time great seahawk. You could argue that he's the 2nd best WR in team history.
Him and Doug would be right there behind Largent, imo.
Statistically he is by a long shot. But for me Doug is like Marshawn. He meant way more than his stats(which werent bad at all). Seattle really should just draft the next reciever born in Tulsa on Sept 28th. Its only wierd if it doesn't work.
 

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
11,368
Reaction score
6,497
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Still think the Giants not playing Barkley was very defensible at the time and probably the right decision with the information they had. He was frequently injured and was coming off a terrible season, one of several disappointing seasons he had had since they took him #2 overall in the draft, passing on Josh Allen and Sam Darnold even though they had no backup for 37-year-old Eli Manning. Eventually, a bad team can't keep giving top of the market money to an unreliable player at a non-premium position. They just got unlucky that Barkley went to the Eagles.

There was a report yesterday that they're now expected to pursue Russell Wilson in free agency. Now THAT would be a mistake.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top