FearTheHawk
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
- Messages
- 131
- Reaction score
- 168
I'm all for getting Deshaun for this very reason. I think that guy is special in a better system than Houston's
FearTheHawk":2axasnto said:best QB in the NFC? lolololol. Give me Aaron Rodgers 10/10 times.
Bigpumpkin":1whflt51 said:Comparing Russ to Tom Brady, who just became one of the oldest active QB in the history of the NFL, provides an interesting contrast. Tom is 6 inches taller and quite thin and Russ has packed on the weight in the past two years to slow him down noticeably. It is highly unlikely that Russ will still be playing when he is 43.
6ft-2to6 is a big difference than 5ft8-10 the OL-DLJohn63":3t1nuraa said:FearTheHawk":3t1nuraa said:All true. I'm also going to say it. Russ's height is an issue. Now that he's slowed down and defenses have schemed for him, his height is starting to become a huge issue. Not hitting hot routes over the middle is devastating when facing a good D line. He can't hit slants. and teams have figured out how to attack outside routes while pressuring Russ and he and Pete haven't adjusted in the slightest.
The problem with what you are saying is even 6 foot 2+ QBs need throwing lanes. Th eline man are 6 foot 5 so no QB shorter than 6 foot 6 can see without lanes, let alone throw.
THE TABS":3edcjrzm said:Not only is Russ the best quarterback in the NFC, we need to double down on the LRC movement and let him call his own plays. He is, in effect, our best offensive coordinator. His ability to read a defense pre-snap is on par with Peyton Manning in his prime, and for the sake of the franchise and to extend our championship window, we need to provide him with more tools to do so.
Stop trying to chop down a tree with an axe, and use the damn chainsaw.
BleuEyedHawk":9frjauqi said:Here's another important difference between Russ and Tom Brady:
https://www.businessinsider.com/tom-bra ... mel-2019-5
Tom took a lot less in salary and put ego aside for the good of his team. He recognized the financial aspect of the salary cap and said it was worth taking less money and paying for good players around him. The article mentioned the 35 million salary of Russ compared to the 15 million Tom was receiving.
As much as I didn't like the Patriots, I respect that Tom put his money where is mouth was.
I also like his modesty regarding publicity. I appreciate his dedication to football and not trying to glam it up with constant media contributions via social posts.
I'm a little annoyed with Russ's frivolity - perfumes, podcasts, clothing lines and the like. Even if it wasn't distracting, it says "me, me, me" and it's not a good look. Like the article says, "How much money do you really need?"
Chapow":9frjauqi said:Please see this thread http://www.seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=153442
And here is my response in that thread to the question "Should Russell Wilson Take A Tom Brady Like Deal?"
Chapow":9frjauqi said:Sure, and then the Seahawks should just do what the Patriots do with Tom Brady since apparently that's completely fine.
The Patriots, in an unusual departure from National Football League practice, have created a revenue stream for a private business owned by their franchise quarterback, Tom Brady, and a partner who faced federal sanctions after falsely presenting himself as a medical doctor and deceptively promoting nutritional supplements.
The NFL says it is aware of the arrangement and has taken no action, despite questions from some specialists in sports law and economics about whether teams should pay for services by for-profit companies owned by their active players and whether the relationship provides value to Brady that should be counted against the club’s salary cap.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015 ... story.html
Just sign Wilson to a way below market value contract but pay companies he owns for their "goods and services" however much the difference would be between his contract and his actual market value.
What?
You all thought Brady was actually playing for far below his market value so that the Patriots would have more money to pay other players, thus making it possible to field a better team and have a better shot a championships out of the goodness of his heart? Or because he cares about winning more than making his full market value?
:lol:
Nope. Brady is still getting his. And with this "arrangement" nobody really knows how much he is getting from the Patriots. And apparently the NFL doesn't care.
Gotta wonder how that would go over with the NFL if the Texans tried pulling that with Watson, or the Chiefs tried it with Mahomes, or the Seahawks tried it with Russ.
You're right about one thing though, Tom Brady is a very smart man. He's got a lot of people fooled. :2thumbs:
BleuEyedHawk":9frjauqi said:Like the article says, "How much money do you really need?"
SoulfishHawk":2b7zaign said:Some people clearly don't watch football. But feel free to keep convincing yourself he isn't a good QB.
Bigpumpkin":3rjluh7k said:keasley45":3rjluh7k said:20210103_175554 by J_Otte, on Flickr
20210103_175623 by J_Otte, on Flickr
So who's fault was this? Pete or Schotty's?
This happened far to manytimes to count this year. Every game is full of them, starting with the first loss to Arizona. Russ either cant, or wont throw timing routes, hots, close to the line or crossers and defenses know it. They've given us that oart of the field week after week and even when the plays are there, we dont pull the trigger.
I'm starting to believe that he can't even see them due to lack of height.
ludakrishna":36b99l2f said:SoulfishHawk":36b99l2f said:Some people clearly don't watch football. But feel free to keep convincing yourself he isn't a good QB.
What’s the definition of good? He’s a completely serviceable Elite Game Manager. That is good enough if you have an Elite Supporting Cast. Just because he is not/can’t be elite, doesn’t mean he’s bad...it just means that he can never be great. He is good when you have pieces around him and don’t ask him to do too much
SoulfishHawk":1owchkmv said:We get it, you don't like the dude.
I'm done talking about this tired subject.
Bigpumpkin":qxwdxf0f said:Comparing Russ to Tom Brady, who just became one of the oldest active QB in the history of the NFL, provides an interesting contrast. Tom is 6 inches taller and quite thin and Russ has packed on the weight in the past two years to slow him down noticeably. It is highly unlikely that Russ will still be playing when he is 43.
Sgt. Largent":1k5o2jqe said:Russell's a fantastic football player. He's dedicated, a born baller, clutch and tough as hell..........but he has limitations.
I compare Russell to a point guard, he NEEDS to get into that confidence, rhythm and tempo in order to be at his best. Good defenses like the Rams know how to get him out of his comfort zones and take away all the things he likes to do.
Plain and simple. Doesn't mean he's no longer a good QB, just means Pete's right and you can't just put the game on his shoulders and "let Russ cook." That's really what Pete was saying yesterday, in order to take advantage of what Russell does well, which is play action and make explosive plays downfield then we DESPERATELY need a punch you in the mouth physical effective run game to suck those safeties down and tire out these really good front sevens.
Now is this worth 35M a year when what Pete's talking about could probably be done by 20 other QB's in the league which would allow us far more cap space to build a better defense and O-line in order to run the rock? Hard for me to say, but yes probably.