Our WR duo comparison

Cirmman

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
193
Reaction score
17
Location
Brasília - Brazil
Now the 2018 season is over, I had a question for the .net:

Do you guys believe that the current duo Doug Baldwin and Tyler Lockett are better than 2013 Baldwin and Tate?

Talking only about the WR duo
 

knownone

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
5,805
Reaction score
2,953
Healthy Baldwin and Lockett are better than Baldwin and Tate.
 

HawkerD

Active member
Joined
Oct 19, 2014
Messages
1,042
Reaction score
0
Location
Covington WA
Baldwin is a much better player than he was 4 years ago. Lockett was stellar this year. That said, Wilson would be deadly with a top 5 WR that is 6'2"+. Someone like Mike Evans.
 

nwHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
4,334
Reaction score
1,667
Depends. I like Lockett, but Tate fits our style. Tate added a certain toughness. Tyler is under used in my opinion.


Doug, is the man. That sideline catch today was nice.
 

JGreen79

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
1,197
Reaction score
198
Location
Newberg, Oregon
nwHawk":1m1jxyra said:
Depends. I like Lockett, but Tate fits our style. Tate added a certain toughness. Tyler is under used in my opinion.


Doug, is the man. That sideline catch today was nice.

My dad(Cowboys fan) was screaming "how could they call that a catch!" before the replay. I simply said " Because he's Doug and he caught it. He missed the Lockett diving catch though.

I think Lockett and Tate are very comparable so I'll give the edge to Baldwin and Lockett just because Baldwin is better now than he was then.
 

Thepeelsessions

New member
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
1,848
Reaction score
0
Location
Out here
HawkerD":3bkyffhx said:
Wilson would be deadly with a top 5 WR that is 6'2"+. Someone like Mike Evans.

I've been saying this for years. This draft class is potentially loaded with 6'3" 215+ receivers in the alpha X mold. Don't get me wrong, I love Doug and Lock, but this team needs a big bodied, dominant receiver.

But to the point of the post, I'd take Doug and Lock all day. Tate is very similar to Doug, and Tyler possesses skills that even Tate has never had.
 

brimsalabim

Active member
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
4,509
Reaction score
3
Too few opportunities to judge. I would like to think that including a big receiver in the mix would help open things up for the other two but I’m not sure we have enough plays to go around. We are a run first, run second, and throw sometimes run sometimes on third offense.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,932
Reaction score
2,372
I have become uncertain about what to think about matching up with big and tall receivers. Perhaps there is a natural match up between Russell Wilson love for improvisation and the natural skills of smaller receivers that are quicker at accelerating, decelerating, change of direction and running tight arcs.

But then again, maybe some day a big and tall receiver that Russell can work with and trust will eventually show up. Too bad about David Moore fading over the finish of the season. The offense loss something once opponents figure him out. Sure could have used an effective third receiver on Saturday. I'm all ears about receivers building confidence and trust with Russell Wilson in the off season. That has helped in the past. The Tyler Lockett / Russell Wilson chemistry is one of the more impressive examples in recent history.
 

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
9,003
Reaction score
2,660
HawkerD":345z0bma said:
Baldwin is a much better player than he was 4 years ago. Lockett was stellar this year. That said, Wilson would be deadly with a top 5 WR that is 6'2"+. Someone like Mike Evans.
RW couldn't figure JG out for 3 years..i'm sorry but I think he likes
short Wr's so he can throw low natural.
 
Top