Titus Pullo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2022
- Messages
- 475
- Reaction score
- 388
XLWhich sb did he win?
Is... the outcome supposed to be better without the bridge there at all?
Right on the fringe. If not elite, he was at the top of the second tier.Was Hasselbeck an elite QB?
First off, I want to apologize. I prematurely posted this without finishing my thought and wanted to go back and edit the comment, but got distracted by a work call and never did. I didn't mean to leave it at that as a drive-by insult and am indeed a dick for doing so.Geno & Dak can't or should I say haven't proven they can do anything with a team that Garner hasn't. I would like to hear your argument that Garner also did this with less play makers around him?
Oh and take your "cowerdism" and stick it in your brown eye!
Gardner Minshew has performed so far below Geno and Dak the past two years that this argument that he 'doesn't have the playmakers' reads as completely unrelated to anything he did.Geno & Dak can't or should I say haven't proven they can do anything with a team that Garner hasn't. I would like to hear your argument that Garner also did this with less play makers around him?
Oh and take your "cowerdism" and stick it in your brown eye!
Right on the fringe. If not elite, he was at the top of the second tier.
I don't know.... I found the gif and thought it was cool.Is... the outcome supposed to be better without the bridge there at all?
It's fair that Matt had a great OL and running game, he absolutely did, but 2005 is definitely one of the best QB seasons in Seahawks history regardless and he was absolutely a top 5 (possibly top 3) QB that year.He was not on the fringe. He was never going to be good enough to be talked about as elite. He could never impose his will and take games over. What Matt had was an elite RB and OL that made him look better than what he really was. The people that take up for Hass, but say Wilson wasn't good without Lynch need to take a step back and reconsider what they are talking about.
People forget he was absolutely balling that gameHasselbeck did say "We want the ball, and we're going to score". That sounds like an elite QB to me![]()
Hass played in the era of different rules. He probably would have huge numbers if he played today. QB hits, jamming or touching receivers today, plus all the other changes they made since he retired makes the league more offensive oriented.People forget he was absolutely balling that game
He threw the ball correctly as well, Alex Bannisters dumbass ran a fade instead of a comeback on an option route
I have no clue why he was even in the game on offense in pucking overtime in the playoffs
EDIT: hass's stats also don't fully reflect his play. We frequently lead the league in drops to an embarrassing extent, and those drops bounced right into defenders hands every few games.... Not exaggerating
The rules didn't make the ball drop off receiver handsHass played in the era of different rules. He probably would have huge numbers if he played today. QB hits, jamming or touching receivers today, plus all the other changes they made since he retired makes the league more offensive oriented.
Remind me, which super bowl did Marino win?Which sb did he win?
I’d say in 2007 he was an elite QB. Back in his prime, Hasselbeck was one of the best out there.Right on the fringe. If not elite, he was at the top of the second tier.
What if the rookie was Penix?He provides stability by removing the variable of having a qb who is less capable at running the plays and the offense as it was designed.
With Geno, troubleshooting what's working and what isn't is more straightforward because he will execute the offense as scripted. Grubb, won't have to lighten the load or install gameday plans with a limited number of plays or concepts because his QB is green. Regardless of how talented a rookie is, they are virtually always running a truncated version of the playbook. Either in terms of the complexity of plays, being limited in audibling, line calls, or reducing reads to one side of the field. A rook will also more than likely be challenged in grasping terminology in making the leap from the college game to the pros. Geno won't have that limitation.
With Peetz orchestrating play design and essentially porting Grubbs system into 'NFL language' and format, the offense will be more effective, faster than if a rookie or FA came in. Unless that FA was familiar with the Rams system, as Geno and Peetz are - its the framework upon which a lot of Grubbs concepts will be hung - at the very least in terms of terminology.
I thought the point of all this was to actually win sb's? Apparently I'm wrong. Here's a hypothetical question. If you could snap your fingers and have Marino in his prime, with the stipulation you will not win any sb's, would you do it?Remind me, which super bowl did Marino win?
Considering that he's a VERY possible pick with our 1st, a lot of people seem to be downplaying two things.What if the rookie was Penix?