Pandion Haliaetus":ndm0e3es said:HawkWow":ndm0e3es said:Being the 2nd youngest team in the league is 90% upside. I think our rash of PED busts fall under the other 10%. As young as we are, I question whether or not we have an absolute leader (on the D side). Someone needs to step up. ..and soon.
It's been reported that Winfield is such a guy, but it's unlikely he will be with us for very long. I am hopeful his locker room demeanor / presense will rub off on a guy like Earl (who will be with us for a long time).
It's starting to feel like the inmates have the keys to the asylum aka USC North.
Pete needs to lay the law down on all of this extra-curricular stuff. As much as some of you believe he is just so cuddly cute with his antics, I think Sherman should be the first to have a sit-down with Pete and JS. "Toning things down" should start with him, IMO.
It appears many of you don't care how we win..as long as we win. I assume this is the new, short attention span generation that prefers the quick gratification of MMA to boxing (as an example). I think most of us that have followed this team since it's inception would prefer to win clean (and asterisk free).
In summary:
1) We need a defensive leader.
2) Sherm needs to STFU.
3) Pete, after drafting even more players with "character issues", needs to maintain a very tight leash, starting immediately.
4) Go Hawks (but go with dignity).
Thinks me.
1) We kind of do: Clemons, Bryant, Mebane, and now Chanchellor is getting paid now to be leaders. But you guys are seriously talking about character now? These YOUNG guys got caught with Adderall, big whoop, its not like their taking HGH, or roids, or smoking up weed. Or physically abusing women.
In Holmgren's day, he drafted Stevens who an unconvicted rapist had his fair of troubles in Arizona, Locklear and Fisher physically abused their Girlfriends, we all know about Hill, and even Kerney allowed someone to be raped in his house.
2) I rather not have Sherman shut up, defenses need to have attitude, and Sherman knows what he is exactly doing, he's smarter than his persona and ego, and he does what he does to get under other player's skin. I like that. What CB is going to go up to Tom Brady and talk trash to his face. As long as a player can walk the walk, I don't care if he talks the talk. Its fun when Sherman's reputation makes an offensive lineman attack him when he's only having a friendly convo with opposition's QB.
3) While I agree with this statement but unless a team hires a person to babysit every member of the team, players are going to do what they feel. Its their choice and they'll face the consequences. But this isn't Tim Ruskell's team but its not exactly like were the Bengals.
4) GO Hawks but if you want absolute perfection, get over it.
1) We "kind of" have a leader? That's like being "kind of" pregnant. We either do or we don't, and IF we do, he's obviously not leading very effectively. "Big whoop"? WTF? Not only is this a 4 game suspension, but it's also going to slow his MUCH needed progress. Please tell me you don't seriously believe this was just about Adderall. It is becoming clear the Adderall is a clever excuse (as the league is not allowed from stating the real findings IE: Player is juicing so he adds the adderall. Bust comes down...it was Adderall, which will make the naive say "Big whoop".
2) Sherman definitely needs to shut up. Do you think him calling out the NFL and then gloating that he got away with his act of stupidity is not going to have a negative impact on our team as a whole? He is painting targets on our backs. He made his point, got his 15 mnutes and he'll get his money. Now it's time to give it a rest.
3) IF Pete is going to draft players with questionable backgrounds, it will be his responsibility to babysit them if necessary. IF the player F's up he needs to be dealt with immediately. As I said prevously, the team should impose a penalty on Irvin as well and if that don't work...move him. Some of you are taking the stance that we really don't need him anyway. OK...what if he was essential to us. What if he was as important to the D as Wilson is to the O? What would your position be then?
4) Asking players to abide by the same rules, that every player is asked to abide by, is not exactly asking for "perfection". I don't know you (so don't take this the wrong way) but based on your commentary, it appears your idea of perfection is my idea of ordinary. I could be wrong.