MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 18,570
- Reaction score
- 1,491
You guys can talk to me about DVOA all you want. I know a stupid play call when I see it. I know an ineffective play design when I see it. I know when a gameplan is bass ackwards, putting all the weight of successful execution on the very offensive line that is so inept and failing to adapt to the situation. And I know when an OC has shown the exact same tendencies for four years straight.
Having the fourth best offense in the NFL isn't so nice when it doesn't give you the fourth best record in the NFL.
Break it down into actual situational causes. What was it that caused us to fritter away a HUGE fourth-quarter lead against Cincinnati? In part, a total lack of offense, a flurry of three-and-outs coming right when we needed them the least. What caused the same breakdown against Carolina? Same deal, this time at home. Sure, there were other elements, such as a defense with issues playing against a legitimate top-4 quarterback both times. But when we're talking about three-and-outs, any one of which could have stalled our team to a win, I do place some responsibility there.
As far as "two Super Bowls", I do not and never will see Bevell as a superior coaching candidate because of this. Not when you had a historic defense keeping the scoring burden remedially low and an improvisational QB for the ages who willed us to win on the back of broken plays. The logic that two Super Bowls make Bevell a superior candidate is spurious and unreliable.
I will acknowledge, however, that he could be worse. People wanted Unger and Carpenter gone. Look how that turned out.
I also acknowledge that Pete's habit of treating October like the preseason may also be responsible for some of Bevell's playcalling.
Having the fourth best offense in the NFL isn't so nice when it doesn't give you the fourth best record in the NFL.
Break it down into actual situational causes. What was it that caused us to fritter away a HUGE fourth-quarter lead against Cincinnati? In part, a total lack of offense, a flurry of three-and-outs coming right when we needed them the least. What caused the same breakdown against Carolina? Same deal, this time at home. Sure, there were other elements, such as a defense with issues playing against a legitimate top-4 quarterback both times. But when we're talking about three-and-outs, any one of which could have stalled our team to a win, I do place some responsibility there.
As far as "two Super Bowls", I do not and never will see Bevell as a superior coaching candidate because of this. Not when you had a historic defense keeping the scoring burden remedially low and an improvisational QB for the ages who willed us to win on the back of broken plays. The logic that two Super Bowls make Bevell a superior candidate is spurious and unreliable.
I will acknowledge, however, that he could be worse. People wanted Unger and Carpenter gone. Look how that turned out.
I also acknowledge that Pete's habit of treating October like the preseason may also be responsible for some of Bevell's playcalling.