Surely they have an offensive coordinator calling the plays. Give the ball to Marshawn 24 times.
In fact, after that game, no one in the whole wide world was saying " if only we gave the ball to Baldwin".
No, this is revisionist b.s. , egoist- driven bitterness and sour grapes. Reliving it over and over.
And that is the history people do, and are going to remember about this Seahawks team.
You see it here on .net every day. And to what end? Sad.
It's not revisionist anything.
If every fan had the All22 coaches tape and could go back and watch games and see how many games we played that we could have won handily, had we just run the offense and hit the open wrs on a guven play, it woukd change the perception of #3 entirely. I've done it and still do it now. It changes your perspective if the game.
Doug was open in that SB, as he was in other games he played where he SHOULD have been more of a factor. Had he played on another team for the duration if his career, he'd likely have played longer and been considered among the shortlist of great contemporary wrs.
Our offense wasn't a 3 and out machine because the OC was bad. It was often that way because, like now in Dnever and as he showed over the duration of his career now, Russ isnt a system thrower. It doesn't matter if his wrs beat their guy by a foot or a yard. He very often simply doesn't see the play and leaves it to create on his own.
It woukd have made a significant difference in that game had Wilson been able to do, with Doug, what Brady did with Edelman. More possessions, more first downs, less Brady on the field = increased odds of a win. It mattered then and it mattered in every game we played where wrs were running around open and didn't get the ball.