I'm not saying he's the magic elixir to solve our anemic running game but man, he's missed.
Hopefully he gets back soon.
Hopefully he gets back soon.
Seems he should be eligible soon. Hasn't it been 4 weeks yet?
Yeah, it's week 7 now and time for them to start jelling together as a unit. Health is holding up (knock wood) so I'm looking for real improvement in the next week or so.I'm not an X and O (hug and kiss) kind of guy...well, actually I am. But that's nothing to do with football.
I think the offensive line still has a way to go to get familiar with each other, and with the blocking scheme, but IMHO, a bruising FB covers up for a lot of blemishes.
*POW!* *BAM!* View attachment 74961
well according so some Youtube pateron peddling turd (Topballing aka MUrph) he thinks we're delusional to think robbie outz being out i that big of an impact and blames out IOL even though Outz as FB Definitely helps. I wasnt going to go back and forth with the dick weed.I'm not saying he's the magic elixir to solve our anemic running game but man, he's missed.
Hopefully he gets back soon.
I read recently that Kubiak is running a lot of heavier sets (TEs and such) in an attempt to force more single safety looks by defenses, which they're doing. We've faced a LOT of light safety looks this year and Darnold and JSN have been exploiting that ridiculously, as we all know. A downside is that this simultaneously means more base defense and more linebackers on the field, which can make things harder for the run.With such heavy emphasis on the running game and clearly our OL is the best it's been in recent years, I wonder why we are still struggling with that part of our offense? Is Kubiak's system that dependent on a full back to be effective? You would think between the one/two punch of K9 and Charbs and a pretty stout OL we would be gaining more yards on the ground than we are.
X's and O's gurus, please pick up the white courtesy phone.
I think that’s cause our emphasis on the run is well known, so we have hard running. But we take advantage of what the defense gives us and we gash them eventually with pa or even the run. We’re doing good. Last week we played bad and still won, that’s good. We have had so many things mess up our momentum in games like penalties and weird play calls, but in between we are really effective. Just gotta get smoother. But as far as Ouzts, we all saw his demoralizing blocks and eventually he is gonna catch a pass and destroy some little safety and it’s gonna be awesome! But I think he draws attention, and that impacts gamesI read recently that Kubiak is running a lot of heavier sets (TEs and such) in an attempt to force more single safety looks by defenses, which they're doing. We've faced a LOT of light safety looks this year and Darnold and JSN have been exploiting that ridiculously, as we all know. A downside is that this simultaneously means more base defense and more linebackers on the field, which can make things harder for the run.
With such heavy emphasis on the running game and clearly our OL is the best it's been in recent years, I wonder why we are still struggling with that part of our offense? Is Kubiak's system that dependent on a full back to be effective? You would think between the one/two punch of K9 and Charbs and a pretty stout OL we would be gaining more yards on the ground than we are.
X's and O's gurus, please pick up the white courtesy phone.
I was thinking this exact thought during the last game. Need his thunder in the second half of the season.Ouzts would definitely have a positive effect on our running game. Seems like a lot of folks are downgrading our running backs when the fact is they are not actually the ones deserving the blame.
Yeah, I think it's the overall team when it comes to the run game. But I have hope.I was thinking this exact thought during the last game. Need his thunder in the second half of the season.