Seahawks are 21-9 in last 30 games

[Pandion Haliaetus]

2011: 5-3
2012: 12-6
2013: 4-0

In those 9 losses they haven't lost by more than 7 points and only lost by a combined 37 points overall.

Accomplished with one of youngest rosters in the NFL the last 2 years.

Tell me again why PC/JS doesn't a have Coach of the Year/Executive Of The Year Award(s)?

Or why haters will continue to doubt us first chance they get? Looking at you San Francisco, Skip Bayless, and Tim Ryan

Seahawks are coached to compete like Champions and are built to become a Dynasty.

 

[bellyfat]

Those stats are hand picked and obscure, no one cares about the last 30 games unless it was the Super Bowl. As for San Fransisco they are our rival. It's the talking heads job to be critical and objective or else they be saying nice stuff about everybody. I bet you one thing though PC/JS don't worry about those accolades they only care about the Lombardi trophy.

 

[pmedic920]

Those stats are hand picked and obscure, no one cares about the last 30 games unless it was the Super Bowl. As for San Fransisco they are our rival. It's the talking heads job to be critical and objective or else they be saying nice stuff about everybody. I bet you one thing though PC/JS don't worry about those accolades they only care about the Lombardi trophy.

Hand picked or not. IMO its fun to read it laid out like that. Sure the SB is our goal, but to say nobody cares about those wins...."come on man". I for one, care. Ton-o-fun had watching every one of them.

 

[bellyfat]

No I can agree with that cause I watched all of those games too. But I was just responding to the disrespect part, after "Tell me again". If the topic was presented without the last three sentences then I would've responded differently. I just think that we can shed the disrespect label for now the Seahawks are getting ranked highly by the media and a lot of people do recognized them as a up and coming team worthy of respect. There's always people are going to be critical, I believe that even if we did win anything it would be called a fluke.

 

[Pandion Haliaetus]

Those stats are hand picked and obscure, no one cares about the last 30 games unless it was the Super Bowl. As for San Fransisco they are our rival. It's the talking heads job to be critical and objective or else they be saying nice stuff about everybody. I bet you one thing though PC/JS don't worry about those accolades they only care about the Lombardi trophy.

Sure the stats are hand-picked but there is no obscurity... its been 30 games since the Seahawks lost by more than 7 points.

In 9 losses, Seahawks have lost by an average of only 4.11 points... I challenge you to find a better point differential average in losses since the 2nd half of 2011.

And (the) Superbowl(s) will come as long as the Seahawks continue to win, continue to gain valuable experience, and continue to remain competitive even in losses. I thought that much was at least implied. Only two teams can make a Superbowl, and only one team can win the Superbowl each year and its usually a team with a lot of Post-Season experience.

However, that doest change the fact that a Seahawks team starting a lot of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year player were a defensive stand of making the NFC Championship. That is an incredible feat for any team but more amazing considering the Seahawks reliance on its youth.

And I don't care about the disrespect, it doesn't bother me as it does some. However, this team is very young but very powerful and far from its growth of potential. What bothers me is that some people think they are seeing a finished product, that we peaked, that we still aren't going through growing pains or that we can't get better. Truth is though, Seahawks will only continue to trend upwards within each and every experience on the playing field, on the practice field, in the class-room, and in the locker-room, whether its in the face of adversity or success.