Schneider or McDonald- catalyst for draft philosophy change?

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
5,381
Reaction score
2,601
Two things happened in this draft that we had not seen in either a long time or ever in the JS era:

Draft a QB
Draft an interior OL

The question is was it JS who on his own changed his ways or was it MM who stepped in to say this is what needs to be done?
 

ccla

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
378
Reaction score
281
How about a combination of the two?
I know people want to assign blame and praise to one person (I will admit I do so as well) but it is a partnership no? The GM hss yo work to bring the coach vision to life. So if I have yo pick I would say it is MM as he is the change in the equation.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
2,460
Location
Spokane
Maybe need played a big part? Even though a bit of draft capital was used on the o line last year, it was the biggest need coming into this draft. QB? We are seeing a total reset at the QB position for 2025. Need played the largest role in these draft decisions.
 

Shane Falco

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
2,325
Reaction score
1,440
What about the draft itself? It was an odd one imo. I can't even remember seeing so many good players with injury histories / concerns and I mean in the entire draft. The lack of blue chippers. Maybe that's why we went heavy on Athletic traits, I mean more so than usual and across the board.
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
24,959
Reaction score
5,100
Location
Anchorage, AK
Any good GM is going to work with the coaching staff to get the players for their systems. If John was just going to draft whatever he wanted it wouldn’t work. When Pete was here he said they agreed on the vast majority of draft picks and I would have to assume the same is happening now. A good organization doesn’t just get talented players and force them into playing in systems that don’t fit their abilities. They try to find the players who can play well under the coaches you have.
 
OP
OP
seabowl

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
5,381
Reaction score
2,601
I understand the replies regarding a joint decision on the picks however, John had clearly stated that he did not like using high draft picks on interior lineman. I think part of the decision was also pressure from upper management as the fan base and media have grown inpatient with how many years the line has suffered.
 

Wsumatt1982

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Messages
1,207
Reaction score
1,528
It’s just a matter of them being on the same page. They had limited time together last year and an argument can be made PC overrode JS before that.
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
6,285
Reaction score
2,403
I think part of the decision was also pressure from upper management as the fan base and media have grown inpatient with how many years the line has suffered.

I agree. I'm guessing that Jody made that known to John and Mike... something along the lines of...

"John, our fans are clamoring for improved Oline play and regardless of your personal opinion, let's show them that we're listening."
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,930
Reaction score
2,363
I'm speculating that embracing a growth in house analytics and GPS data is having the biggest affect on year to year changes. IIRC, Jody Allen advocated that direction a couple of years ago. The head coach change came a year later. John has mentioned, in passing, that combine measurables are no longer all that relevant because of in season GPS data. What remains relevant at the combine are the interviews and applied psychology.

It's like a door opened and the organization's talent and performance evaluation stepped into a new room .... a new era.
 

ccla

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
378
Reaction score
281
John had clearly stated that he did not like using high draft picks on interior lineman.
Yeah but that might also be a fruit of the kind of QB you have. I do not want to turn this thread into a bash Russ one, but if you have a one read and then scramble QB, what is the use of having a top flight line? They cannot protect because they do not know where he is. This, to some extent, spilled over to Geno (although for some reason he was extremely reticent to use his legs - and that, in part, was the reason of the frustration with Geno). Now that we have a more traditional QB it makes sense to protect him. It is the difference in a mobile QB that runs ONLY after going through all if his reads (pass rush allowing) and a QB that runs after his first read is not available.
 

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
3,197
Reaction score
1,355
Maybe need played a big part? Even though a bit of draft capital was used on the o line last year, it was the biggest need coming into this draft. QB? We are seeing a total reset at the QB position for 2025. Need played the largest role in these draft decisions.
This right here.
 
OP
OP
seabowl

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
5,381
Reaction score
2,601
Maybe need played a big part? Even though a bit of draft capital was used on the o line last year, it was the biggest need coming into this draft. QB? We are seeing a total reset at the QB position for 2025. Need played the largest role in these draft decisions.
I don’t disagree but there is a big difference between drafting a tackle and guard with their first round pick. There has been a need at, at least one guard position for a long time.
 

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
30,234
Reaction score
5,946
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
Two things happened in this draft that we had not seen in either a long time or ever in the JS era:

Draft a QB
Draft an interior OL

The question is was it JS who on his own changed his ways or was it MM who stepped in to say this is what needs to be done?
Did you see/watch the wrap up press conference?

I did, and I truly believe that it’s a team effort.

Funny how football is that way even off the field.

Just look at the Cowboys if you don’t believe me, they are a perfect example of what happens when one guy tries to be “thee guy”.
 

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,399
Reaction score
1,428
Location
Taipei
don't underestimate no Pete being here.

Jeanty pick was an obvious choice and a home run. the rest of the Raiders draft was balls. Could've been all Spytek though, no way of knowing Pete's influence.
 
Last edited:

BigMeach

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
480
When possibly the best left guard of all time tells you to draft Zabel, you listen. As for the change, I'd imagine it's a combination of the two, JS and MM.

Added Edit:
It's always going to be JS or JS and others. JS has full control now, so it's hard to say "this is all MM" etc.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,384
Reaction score
9,109
Location
SoCal Desert
Two things happened in this draft that we had not seen in either a long time or ever in the JS era:

Draft a QB
Draft an interior OL

The question is was it JS who on his own changed his ways or was it MM who stepped in to say this is what needs to be done?

We on .NET take credit for drafting an interior OL. We, sorry you people, bitched and moaned loud and often enough, the noise reached our lovely Jody, and the rest is history. Lazy narrative or not. I have stood steadfast in my support of the Schneider doctrine.

As for QB, it's on Schneider, he wanted to be that QB guru.
 

James in PA

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
6,633
Reaction score
7,644
John was trying to trade down at 18, but (thankfully) he wasn't able to find a trade partner. So, I doubt he felt a lot of pressure from anyone. He may have not loved the "value" there, but Zabel was the right move with Donovan Jackson going a few picks later. We would have lost Zabel, even with a slight trade back.
 

Latest posts

Top