seabowl
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2009
- Messages
- 5,381
- Reaction score
- 2,603
The title says it all. 14 yes 14 straight pass plays non-stop for 1/3 of the game? I thought we got rid of Bevell. PATHETIC!!!!!!
Not 1 running play from 8:11 (2nd q) to 14:15 (4th q)
- Thread starter seabowl
- Start date
SPIRITOF12
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2014
- Messages
- 564
- Reaction score
- 32
Pete Speak "We need to establish the run" really means we will try it a few times then let Russ be Russ and pass pass pass.
SeatownJay
Active member
Saw one reporter on twitter say it was because Pete told Brian to run long pass plays in the 3rd quarter.
SeatownJay":3h5hp65q said:
This would be a great place to link, embed, or screenshot the tweet.
Bare minimum you should state who the reporter is/was.
SeatownJay
Active member
Sorry, I'm at work and don't currently have access to Twitter. I'll look it up when I get home.pmedic920":gfcuiq21 said:
MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 18,567
- Reaction score
- 1,491
SPIRITOF12":1fg3gwmc said:
What it actually means is "we want play action".
bbsplitter
Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2013
- Messages
- 681
- Reaction score
- 23
irfuben32":2eaut1am said:
Maybe partially, but Bevell is also still unemployed I believe, so wasn't exactly a hot commodity...
Seahawk_Dan
Well-known member
bbsplitter":1ocfs1rf said:
Isn't he the QB Coach in Indy?
canucklehead
New member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2018
- Messages
- 27
- Reaction score
- 0
With the offensive inconsistency and o-line challenges its hard to fathom why the Hawks scheme played into Bears pass rush strength.
With 3rd down conversion rate as bad as Hawks, its hard to believe that 3 run plays is not the best option to improve conversion rate even if they know they're coming.
With 3rd down conversion rate as bad as Hawks, its hard to believe that 3 run plays is not the best option to improve conversion rate even if they know they're coming.
