I think Jeremy Lane started over Tharold for one reason

ivotuk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
23,298
Reaction score
2,013
Location
North Pole, Alaska
Speed, pure, unadulterated speed. Because he, and John Brown have plenty of it and Pete didn't want us getting beat deep.

Both Browns have been making DBs look silly this year but John, IMHO, is the scary one. His speed and ability were obvious coming out of Pittsburgh State, buy still it was surprising to see him go in the third round. According to NFL dot com, "Led all receivers at the combine with a 2.46 second 20 yard split."

He was very active in college to, returning punts and kickoffs and was a team captain. Props to AZ for picking this guy as he has won at least one game for them, and in my humble opinion, is a threat to take it to the house on any play. That is unless he's being covered by someone just as fast (4.3 - 40).

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2014/profiles/ ... id=2543847
 

HawKnPeppa

New member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
4,733
Reaction score
0
ivotuk":hutatly2 said:
Speed, pure, unadulterated speed. Because he, and John Brown have plenty of it and Pete didn't want us getting beat deep.

Both Browns have been making DBs look silly this year but John, IMHO, is the scary one. His speed and ability were obvious coming out of Pittsburgh State, buy still it was surprising to see him go in the third round. According to NFL dot com, "Led all receivers at the combine with a 2.46 second 20 yard split."

He was very active in college to, returning punts and kickoffs and was a team captain. Props to AZ for picking this guy as he has won at least one game for them, and in my humble opinion, is a threat to take it to the house on any play. That is unless he's being covered by someone just as fast (4.3 - 40).

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2014/profiles/ ... id=2543847

Both of them (Brown and Lane) have a good combo of speed AND quickness. I think Simon might have been able to hang with Brown, speed-wise, but Lane's also got the quickness of a cat.
 

ManBunts

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
430
Reaction score
0
I think it was speed and penalties. As we saw, their one hope taking shots downfield to get yards was on penalties. They would've picked on that
 

HawKnPeppa

New member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
4,733
Reaction score
0
ManBunts":3q9qvh6r said:
I think it was speed and penalties. As we saw, their one hope taking shots downfield to get yards was on penalties. They would've picked on that

Good point. My wishful thinking saysSimon in improving in that area, but when your opposition's offense depends on penalties to sustain drives, it's a prudent consideration.
 

hawknation2014

New member
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
1
I think there are a few reasons. Simon dislocated a finger last week. Lane has way more experience in the slot than Simon. And they must have liked Maxwell's matchup outside.
 

DavidSeven

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
5,742
Reaction score
0
The Simon/Maxwell combo in nickel has always been about match-ups. They used it against SF. Why? SF has nothing but slow possession receivers. They used it against PHI. Why? Because 6'3" Jordan Matthews plays almost all of his snaps out of the slot.

Against teams with more conventional slot receivers (quick guys like Brown, Welker), you can expect to see Lane get the call in nickel packages.
 

Ziggyy108

New member
Joined
Mar 11, 2014
Messages
476
Reaction score
0
Our depth is insane.

Think about last year as well. Same group of Cornerback's plus Thurmond and Browner
 

Latest posts

Top