IBleedBlueAndGreen
New member
Obviously meant TORN labrum but can't edit from my phone.
SoHo9erFan":2am7gkq6 said:Fair. But we will also have Mario Manningham back this season, along with Kyle Williams. Those two receivers along with Boldin are formidable until Crabtree gets back.hawker84":2am7gkq6 said:SoHo9erFan":2am7gkq6 said:Long term, this injury is not that severe. At worst, he will return late October/early November. Until then you guys will operate with the same offense from last year.
Now you guys are in the same boat as 49ers fans. Crabtree is expected to make his return around that time.
Not the same boat, we'd be operating with our same starters as last year, who proved solid and productive especially in the 2nd half of the season.. Niners on the other hand will have Boldin, Davis and a handfull of question marks.. big differnce.
Btw, you know that wasn't the point I was making. All I said was that, at the very worst, you guys would be expecting your #1 WR to return around the same time as the 49ers #1. Why are you so sensitive?
Thank you, and hopefully you are indeed correct.IBleedBlueAndGreen":1rson3wq said:Sports Certified Physical Therapist's perspective here: a turn labrum in the hip can mean almost nothing, or it could be really bad. For those that don't know, the labrum is a ring of connective tissue that goes around the outside of the entire socket to help deepen the socket and provide more stability to the joint. The labrum can be torn at any point in that ring but the location of the tear (i.e. the o'clock vs nine o'clock position) and the size of the tear are what's important.
We will likely never know those specifics. If a tear is small enough, or in some locations then it just means he plays through some discomfort. If the tear is in other locations, or if it's big enough then surgery is required because of the lack of stability in the hip joint that occurs. Without surgical repair the tear could get bigger, or other secondary injuries could occur because of new sloppy mechanics in the joint.
Considering he was playing at full speed very recently and had a complaint of some hip discomfort during OTAs my best guess is that this is not something that will require surgery. I wouldn't be shocked if he doesn't see the practice field until 2-3 weeks from now if the hip is already inflamed. Note: I have nothing to base that on other than his recent timeline and my educated speculation.
Hopefully I'm correct.
IBleedBlueAndGreen":42slr9sb said:Sports Certified Physical Therapist's perspective here: a turn labrum in the hip can mean almost nothing, or it could be really bad. For those that don't know, the labrum is a ring of connective tissue that goes around the outside of the entire socket to help deepen the socket and provide more stability to the joint. The labrum can be torn at any point in that ring but the location of the tear (i.e. the o'clock vs nine o'clock position) and the size of the tear are what's important.
We will likely never know those specifics. If a tear is small enough, or in some locations then it just means he plays through some discomfort. If the tear is in other locations, or if it's big enough then surgery is required because of the lack of stability in the hip joint that occurs. Without surgical repair the tear could get bigger, or other secondary injuries could occur because of new sloppy mechanics in the joint.
Considering he was playing at full speed very recently and had a complaint of some hip discomfort during OTAs my best guess is that this is not something that will require surgery. I wouldn't be shocked if he doesn't see the practice field until 2-3 weeks from now if the hip is already inflamed. Note: I have nothing to base that on other than his recent timeline and my educated speculation.
Hopefully I'm correct.
SoHo9erFan":261ykec3 said:Sarlacc83":261ykec3 said:Did you just use the words formidable and Kyle Williams in a sentence? I get that you can probably club someone to death with those hands of stones, but that's not exactly allowed on the football field.
Kyle Williams is equivalent to Baldwin and this forum seems to think Baldwin is a formidable receiver. So yeah using your logic it makes sense. And Kyle has great hands as a receiver. I can't recall him dropping a pass. Sure, he muffed some crucial punts, but that is not an indictment on his receiving skills.
Your assuming Harvin will miss extended time, which hasn't been confirmed yet.NinerLifer":1tikfjtd said:http://blogs.sacbee.com/49ers/archives/ ... -camp.html
So the same day Harvin gets put on the PUP list, the Niners get Kyle Williams back from it. Talk about a swing of events today between the 2 super powers of the NFC West.
It always sucks to hear that one of the best players on your team goes down with an injury. I agree though that while your offense will not have the added benefit of Harvin for about as long as we are without Crabtree, the real cog that your offense's success hinges on is Wilson. As long as he stays healthy you guys will be ok.
Smelly McUgly":277dnrf8 said:Man, if he gives us a couple KR TDs and 1200 yards combined rushing and receiving, he can miss all the practices he wants.
Production when the games count is all I care about unless you kill another man or something like that.
NinerLifer":172ktngg said:SoHo9erFan":172ktngg said:Fair. But we will also have Mario Manningham back this season, along with Kyle Williams. Those two receivers along with Boldin are formidable until Crabtree gets back.hawker84":172ktngg said:SoHo9erFan said:Long term, this injury is not that severe. At worst, he will return late October/early November. Until then you guys will operate with the same offense from last year.
Now you guys are in the same boat as 49ers fans. Crabtree is expected to make his return around that time.
Not the same boat, we'd be operating with our same starters as last year, who proved solid and productive especially in the 2nd half of the season.. Niners on the other hand will have Boldin, Davis and a handfull of question marks.. big differnce.
Btw, you know that wasn't the point I was making. All I said was that, at the very worst, you guys would be expecting your #1 WR to return around the same time as the 49ers #1. Why are you so sensitive?
http://blogs.sacbee.com/49ers/archives/ ... -camp.html
So the same day Harvin gets put on the PUP list, the Niners get Kyle Williams back from it. Talk about a swing of events today between the 2 super powers of the NFC West.
It always sucks to hear that one of the best players on your team goes down with an injury. I agree though that while your offense will not have the added benefit of Harvin for about as long as we are without Crabtree, the real cog that your offense's success hinges on is Wilson. As long as he stays healthy you guys will be ok.
JSeahawks":23ojgb15 said:Smelly McUgly":23ojgb15 said:Man, if he gives us a couple KR TDs and 1200 yards combined rushing and receiving, he can miss all the practices he wants.
Production when the games count is all I care about unless you kill another man or something like that.
Depends on the quality of the man he killed... I could be willing to look past it if its a case of population control.
But seriously, i'm fine with him just showing up on gameday and in the film room.
Whatever. He only played one game against your squad. The one game was with Alex Smith at QB who rarely targeted WRs compared to Kaep. Kyle was a huge loss last season. Same with Manningham. Both went down around the same time Kaep became the started. Imagine what those receivers could do in an offense that was more aggressive than an Alex Smith offense. Mario and Kyle will return by Week 1. Both are formidable receivers. Your blind hate is really old.Sarlacc83":1c3xz4qo said:SoHo9erFan":1c3xz4qo said:Sarlacc83":1c3xz4qo said:Did you just use the words formidable and Kyle Williams in a sentence? I get that you can probably club someone to death with those hands of stones, but that's not exactly allowed on the football field.
Kyle Williams is equivalent to Baldwin and this forum seems to think Baldwin is a formidable receiver. So yeah using your logic it makes sense. And Kyle has great hands as a receiver. I can't recall him dropping a pass. Sure, he muffed some crucial punts, but that is not an indictment on his receiving skills.
In other words, you're concocting a strawman argument based on things I never said (and which isn't even the prevailing opinion of this board, discounting the fact that most people think he's a warrior after getting back on the field after the Arizona game). Furthermore, Dougie Fresh had 2 TDs against SF, didn't he? Looks to me like your savior has amassed a whopping 22 yards on 2 catches against Seattle.
And yes, dropping crucial punts IS an indictment. An indictment about his hands of stone. My head hurts looking at this poor attempt at this defense of what's going to be a terrible receiving corps next year.
NinerLifer":34h1un6b said:Wondering though...
If given the option, would you rather Harvin decide to go ahead with surgery if it means that he would be available prior to the post-season, or would some of you rather him elect to not have surgery at all and take the chance of him injuring it further which would result in him missing the remainder of the season from that point?
There are disadvantages to both scenarios, but given that defenders will no doubt target that hip if he doesn't elect surgery, choosing to have the surgery now would possibly be in his and your teams best interest.
You do the surgery. Plain and simple. It might not come down to that though. The doctors could clear him to play without any concern going forward.NinerLifer":22xhjy7n said:Wondering though...
If given the option, would you rather Harvin decide to go ahead with surgery if it means that he would be available prior to the post-season, or would some of you rather him elect to not have surgery at all and take the chance of him injuring it further which would result in him missing the remainder of the season from that point?
There are disadvantages to both scenarios, but given that defenders will no doubt target that hip if he doesn't elect surgery, choosing to have the surgery now would possibly be in his and your teams best interest.
IBleedBlueAndGreen":1od8has9 said:Sports Certified Physical Therapist's perspective here: a turn labrum in the hip can mean almost nothing, or it could be really bad. For those that don't know, the labrum is a ring of connective tissue that goes around the outside of the entire socket to help deepen the socket and provide more stability to the joint. The labrum can be torn at any point in that ring but the location of the tear (i.e. the o'clock vs nine o'clock position) and the size of the tear are what's important.
We will likely never know those specifics. If a tear is small enough, or in some locations then it just means he plays through some discomfort. If the tear is in other locations, or if it's big enough then surgery is required because of the lack of stability in the hip joint that occurs. Without surgical repair the tear could get bigger, or other secondary injuries could occur because of new sloppy mechanics in the joint.
Considering he was playing at full speed very recently and had a complaint of some hip discomfort during OTAs my best guess is that this is not something that will require surgery. I wouldn't be shocked if he doesn't see the practice field until 2-3 weeks from now if the hip is already inflamed. Note: I have nothing to base that on other than his recent timeline and my educated speculation.
Hopefully I'm correct.