John63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2018
- Messages
- 6,651
- Reaction score
- 149
oh and again 2.4 seconds an avg oline should handle 2.5 we are below avg.
John63":1it49bz8 said:And again you have an oline that is not even avg, ranked 25th even below Cincy an oline who gave up one of the higher und pressure rates in the NFL. And is below avg in giving up pressure in under 2.5 seconds
Now lets add more From Footballoutsiders
Wilson didn't make this list a year ago, but he's here a few months after voicing his frustration with "getting hit too much," and, well, the numbers tell us he has a case. Of the top passers on this list, no one endured a faster average time to sack than Wilson"
And on that list Lord Rodgers.
Now let's do more, and again avg oline should hold for 2.5 seconds
Seahawks
Time to pass or pressure 2.4
Sacks 33
Knock Downs 41
Hurried 49
Hit 25
This means Wilson was hit, hurried, sacked, or knocked down on over 37% of his pass attempts Top 5 in the league. With a whopping 72% within the 2.5-second avg mark.
While I will always and have said many factors go into a hit, hurry, sack or pressure:
Line
Rb
Wr
Te
Qb
Down and distance
Play call
Also estimated Wilson's agility and mobility have saved on avg 1.8 sacks per game or 25 jus this past season alone.
Of these far and away the biggest culprit is the oline.
That said if the last 2 games are any indicator we may have addressed the play call. Now we need to address the oline, started with a new coach, Kind of, now let's get some real olineman that can pass block and run block. And hope the system we used in the last games is what we do.
John63":8vh9vhzu said:oh and let's remember the Bengals Olien was ranked higher than ours in the PFF list.
Maelstrom787":7are9hmd said:John63":7are9hmd said:oh and let's remember the Bengals Olien was ranked higher than ours in the PFF list.
You don't believe in PFF grades, though. They're saying Kansas City's line is near perfect, but their quarterbacks TTT/TTP is 2.4 seconds. That's below average, remember?
toffee":1bsd5o44 said:WarHawks":1bsd5o44 said:Yxes1122":1bsd5o44 said:Two words. QB play.
Burrow is a better quick game QB than Wilson. Wilson’s sack fumble against the Cards was his failure in quick game execution.
The QB has a lot to do with the performance of the OL, and when your QB tends to see the field deep to short, your OL is going to be impacted.
This is not to say Joe Burrow is better than Wilson. I’m not trying to wade into those waters. But the style in which they play is different. Burrow is on the Brady-Manning-Ryan spectrum of QBs and he helps mitigate deficiencies on the OL with quick execution. Wilson’s improvisational style and favoring of shot plays negatively impacts the OL.
Pass blocking (or even run blocking) is not a “who has the best bodies” on the line. There’s a lot of chemistry between the 5 OL, the QB, and even the RB that makes it work.
Excellent post. Agree 100%
Our OL provided Wilson with above average pocket time, sure was more than Big Ben, Rodgers, and Brady. But Wilson suffered the highest QB pressure. Easy translation, our QB didn't rid the ball like the Brady bunch. Some said Big Ben, Rodgers and Brady will suffer playing with our OL, may be, but may be our OL could also rank higher protecting the Brady bunch.