knownone":tmzcjynt said:Have you been living under a rock for the last decade of Seahawks football? I haven't read the article in years, but I was fairly accurate in my recollection. Bennett is hardly mentioned in the article, and people have speculated that it was Sherman and Baldwin who were the unnamed sources. There's also a Seth Wickersomething article floating around that provides more insight into the situation. Here are a few highlights:John63":tmzcjynt said:knownone":tmzcjynt said:It wasn't just that he was above criticism. Didn't Russell ask Pete to stop allowing the defense to talk smack to him in practice? There was an article about that the year Sherman left. At the time, I thought it was just sour grapes, but a lot of their complaints have seemingly come true.mistaowen":tmzcjynt said:Unless this all stems from those rumors awhile ago that Russ was above criticism, too close to the FO, etc and the locker room didn’t like that. So now that’s he’s upset with them and looking to leave, they’re laughing/saying told you so?
This 30 for 30 in 10 years talking about the Seahawks after the Pats SB loss will be must watch TV haha
For example, they said Russ cared more about his brand than the team. They said if he didn't get his way, he would go behind your back and tell on you. The whole article frames Russell as the problem with Pete enabling his diva-like behavior. It was all laughable at the time, but the fact that it's even somewhat relevant today is crazy. I always thought Sherman was the problem. Now, I'm not so sure. That 30-30 needs to be made tomorrow. I can't wait 10 years for the potential Wilson heel-turn.
Okay more made up stuff. There is nothing showing Wilson ever asked that all, as Sherman has said he talked crap to everyone. As to all these things you said they said provide links because some of them I never heard or read. IN fact Bennett Wrote a book where he said all that was not true, as it relates to him, and he was supposedly one of the ones who said.
All that aside the fact you " I can't wait 10 years for the potential Wilson heel-turn" What if we find out it is not a Wilson he'll turn but a Sherman heel turn, and he just put words in others mouths since we have not heard it form anyone but him.
Some also dispute that Wilson puts in the work necessary to earn his status with the team and in NFL at large, believing he has prioritized his business interests over football.
When McDaniel arrived in Seattle in ’13, he went to dinner with several defensive players and asked them why things seemed off between the defense and the quarterback. He was told by those players to be careful speaking frankly when Wilson was around, because they believed what they said could wind up on Carroll’s desk.
Carroll gathered his offensive and defensive leaders and told them they needed to protect Wilson, to treat him more gently than they would their other teammates.
“He protected him,” one Seahawk says. “And we hated that. Any time he f----- up, Pete would never say anything. Not in a team meeting, not publicly, never. If Russ had a terrible game, he would always talk about how resilient he was. We’re like, what the f--- are you talking about?”
Avril continues, “at one point we were allowed, people were allowed to talk trash to him.” Then, after 2014, they weren’t.
https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/09/07/seatt ... te-carroll
John63":3l7k1qix said:knownone":3l7k1qix said:Have you been living under a rock for the last decade of Seahawks football? I haven't read the article in years, but I was fairly accurate in my recollection. Bennett is hardly mentioned in the article, and people have speculated that it was Sherman and Baldwin who were the unnamed sources. There's also a Seth Wickersomething article floating around that provides more insight into the situation. Here are a few highlights:John63":3l7k1qix said:knownone":3l7k1qix said:It wasn't just that he was above criticism. Didn't Russell ask Pete to stop allowing the defense to talk smack to him in practice? There was an article about that the year Sherman left. At the time, I thought it was just sour grapes, but a lot of their complaints have seemingly come true.
For example, they said Russ cared more about his brand than the team. They said if he didn't get his way, he would go behind your back and tell on you. The whole article frames Russell as the problem with Pete enabling his diva-like behavior. It was all laughable at the time, but the fact that it's even somewhat relevant today is crazy. I always thought Sherman was the problem. Now, I'm not so sure. That 30-30 needs to be made tomorrow. I can't wait 10 years for the potential Wilson heel-turn.
Okay more made up stuff. There is nothing showing Wilson ever asked that all, as Sherman has said he talked crap to everyone. As to all these things you said they said provide links because some of them I never heard or read. IN fact Bennett Wrote a book where he said all that was not true, as it relates to him, and he was supposedly one of the ones who said.
All that aside the fact you " I can't wait 10 years for the potential Wilson heel-turn" What if we find out it is not a Wilson he'll turn but a Sherman heel turn, and he just put words in others mouths since we have not heard it form anyone but him.
Some also dispute that Wilson puts in the work necessary to earn his status with the team and in NFL at large, believing he has prioritized his business interests over football.
When McDaniel arrived in Seattle in ’13, he went to dinner with several defensive players and asked them why things seemed off between the defense and the quarterback. He was told by those players to be careful speaking frankly when Wilson was around, because they believed what they said could wind up on Carroll’s desk.
Carroll gathered his offensive and defensive leaders and told them they needed to protect Wilson, to treat him more gently than they would their other teammates.
“He protected him,” one Seahawk says. “And we hated that. Any time he f----- up, Pete would never say anything. Not in a team meeting, not publicly, never. If Russ had a terrible game, he would always talk about how resilient he was. We’re like, what the f--- are you talking about?”
Avril continues, “at one point we were allowed, people were allowed to talk trash to him.” Then, after 2014, they weren’t.
https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/09/07/seatt ... te-carroll
What I love most is every t8me something really bad is sad about Wilson its.a not named player. Laughable as hell.to me.
Russ can’t run the west coast. He has trouble seeing the middle of the field. How many open TE’s and receivers has he missed over the middle. Where he didn’t even through it. He needs lanes in his line open to see them. So it’s a designed type of play. Taller QB’s would do better in the WCO.jeremiah":1lk6iw1o said:A new head coach makes more sense. Someone who knows the West Coast offense of Steve Young or current KC runs. RW is perfect for that style of offense. I am not a fan of his per se, Wilson that is, but the draft choices just are not worth a top 10 QB. You MUST get a QB back, plus at least 2 middle to high firsts possible. If you get no QB , you may as well retire the core and begin again. I know that isn't going to happen, but if it doesn't the best scenario is RW as a Hawk.
getnasty":304b894d said:Cliff Avril was on Espn national radio today talking about the situation. He said guys were jealous that Pete and the front office gave Russ special treatment. He said it didn't bother him but some guys just couldn't get over it. He also talked about Pete like he was the best of the best, seemed like he had tons of love for Pete. Not saying he didn't for Russ but he seemed definitely more on the Pete bandwagon to me.
HawkinNY":2vxaxmis said:Russ can’t run the west coast. He has trouble seeing the middle of the field. How many open TE’s and receivers has he missed over the middle. Where he didn’t even through it. He needs lanes in his line open to see them. So it’s a designed type of play. Taller QB’s would do better in the WCO.jeremiah":2vxaxmis said:A new head coach makes more sense. Someone who knows the West Coast offense of Steve Young or current KC runs. RW is perfect for that style of offense. I am not a fan of his per se, Wilson that is, but the draft choices just are not worth a top 10 QB. You MUST get a QB back, plus at least 2 middle to high firsts possible. If you get no QB , you may as well retire the core and begin again. I know that isn't going to happen, but if it doesn't the best scenario is RW as a Hawk.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pinksheets":1jpwthtk said:Why don't these guys just say what they mean? I don't get why they just play coy.
Seanhawk":2489lc50 said:This is so stupid. This post could be about anything. If it is about Russ, then as someone said earlier, say what you mean. Don't post some lame, vague, passive aggressive, cowardly BS.
HawkinNY":3j3xwhwj said:Russ can’t run the west coast. He has trouble seeing the middle of the field. How many open TE’s and receivers has he missed over the middle. Where he didn’t even through it. He needs lanes in his line open to see them. So it’s a designed type of play. Taller QB’s would do better in the WCO.jeremiah":3j3xwhwj said:A new head coach makes more sense. Someone who knows the West Coast offense of Steve Young or current KC runs. RW is perfect for that style of offense. I am not a fan of his per se, Wilson that is, but the draft choices just are not worth a top 10 QB. You MUST get a QB back, plus at least 2 middle to high firsts possible. If you get no QB , you may as well retire the core and begin again. I know that isn't going to happen, but if it doesn't the best scenario is RW as a Hawk.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Shanegotyou11":3nnjnorg said:John63":3nnjnorg said:KitsapGuy":3nnjnorg said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/DougBaldwinJr/status/1365051848483241984[/tweet]
:3-1:
oka and the point?
Go look at sherman and kearse tweet when this was all going down. Then go look at hawk fans in the replies.
hawkfan68":g33ymoh7 said:Shanegotyou11":g33ymoh7 said:John63":g33ymoh7 said:KitsapGuy":g33ymoh7 said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/DougBaldwinJr/status/1365051848483241984[/tweet]
:3-1:
oka and the point?
Go look at sherman and kearse tweet when this was all going down. Then go look at hawk fans in the replies.
Why would Kearse be upset with RW? RW threw the ball to Kearse more than should have. Remember the time RW kept throwing passes to Kearse but Kearse had hands of stone....that game where Kearse couldn’t catch a cold if he tried? Yet Russ kept throwing it to him. Kearse’s career died the day he left the Seahawks...why? He didn’t have RW throwing him passes. I highly doubt Kearse was talking about Russ. I don’t believe Kearse is stupid enough to bite the hand that fed him.
John63":1dccgsof said:hawkfan68":1dccgsof said:Shanegotyou11":1dccgsof said:John63":1dccgsof said:oka and the point?
Go look at sherman and kearse tweet when this was all going down. Then go look at hawk fans in the replies.
Why would Kearse be upset with RW? RW threw the ball to Kearse more than should have. Remember the time RW kept throwing passes to Kearse but Kearse had hands of stone....that game where Kearse couldn’t catch a cold if he tried? Yet Russ kept throwing it to him. Kearse’s career died the day he left the Seahawks...why? He didn’t have RW throwing him passes. I highly doubt Kearse was talking about Russ. I don’t believe Kearse is stupid enough to bite the hand that fed him.
I thiink it is about this
"“I’m [going to] really miss Brennan not being part of our club because he and Nate have been really big factors because they’ll tell me stuff other guys won’t tell me,” Pete Carroll said last month. “They have always been really instrumental, and moving forward, I’m going to miss something there.”"
IF your sons who you will not fire are the only ones willing to stand up to you that's a problem.
then also "According to a report from TheAthletic.com, Wilson and those around him believe Carroll and his sons answer to no one." I hate using unsupported claims (meaning no direct Source), but I am betting this is other players as well. For a Coach who preaches accountability to answer to none is not good.
John63":34ztun2g said:hawkfan68":34ztun2g said:Shanegotyou11":34ztun2g said:John63":34ztun2g said:oka and the point?
Go look at sherman and kearse tweet when this was all going down. Then go look at hawk fans in the replies.
Why would Kearse be upset with RW? RW threw the ball to Kearse more than should have. Remember the time RW kept throwing passes to Kearse but Kearse had hands of stone....that game where Kearse couldn’t catch a cold if he tried? Yet Russ kept throwing it to him. Kearse’s career died the day he left the Seahawks...why? He didn’t have RW throwing him passes. I highly doubt Kearse was talking about Russ. I don’t believe Kearse is stupid enough to bite the hand that fed him.
I thiink it is about this
"“I’m [going to] really miss Brennan not being part of our club because he and Nate have been really big factors because they’ll tell me stuff other guys won’t tell me,” Pete Carroll said last month. “They have always been really instrumental, and moving forward, I’m going to miss something there.”"
IF your sons who you will not fire are the only ones willing to stand up to you that's a problem.
then also "According to a report from TheAthletic.com, Wilson and those around him believe Carroll and his sons answer to no one." I hate using unsupported claims (meaning no direct Source), but I am betting this is other players as well. For a Coach who preaches accountability to answer to none is not good.
pinksheets":33pm683a said:John63":33pm683a said:hawkfan68":33pm683a said:Shanegotyou11":33pm683a said:Go look at sherman and kearse tweet when this was all going down. Then go look at hawk fans in the replies.
Why would Kearse be upset with RW? RW threw the ball to Kearse more than should have. Remember the time RW kept throwing passes to Kearse but Kearse had hands of stone....that game where Kearse couldn’t catch a cold if he tried? Yet Russ kept throwing it to him. Kearse’s career died the day he left the Seahawks...why? He didn’t have RW throwing him passes. I highly doubt Kearse was talking about Russ. I don’t believe Kearse is stupid enough to bite the hand that fed him.
I thiink it is about this
"“I’m [going to] really miss Brennan not being part of our club because he and Nate have been really big factors because they’ll tell me stuff other guys won’t tell me,” Pete Carroll said last month. “They have always been really instrumental, and moving forward, I’m going to miss something there.”"
IF your sons who you will not fire are the only ones willing to stand up to you that's a problem.
then also "According to a report from TheAthletic.com, Wilson and those around him believe Carroll and his sons answer to no one." I hate using unsupported claims (meaning no direct Source), but I am betting this is other players as well. For a Coach who preaches accountability to answer to none is not good.
Would you family tell you hard truths others in your life might not? That's literally all that quote is saying.
I'm not saying there aren't accountability issues with Pete right now, but using that quote either means you're lacking in reading comprehension or you're being intentionally disingenuous.
HawkinNY":445i6hgw said:jeremiah":445i6hgw said:A new head coach makes more sense. Someone who knows the West Coast offense of Steve Young or current KC runs. RW is perfect for that style of offense. I am not a fan of his per se, Wilson that is, but the draft choices just are not worth a top 10 QB. You MUST get a QB back, plus at least 2 middle to high firsts possible. If you get no QB , you may as well retire the core and begin again. I know that isn't going to happen, but if it doesn't the best scenario is RW as a Hawk.[/quote]Russ can’t run the west coast. He has trouble seeing the middle of the field. How many open TE’s and receivers has he missed over the middle. Where he didn’t even through it. He needs lanes in his line open to see them. So it’s a designed type of play. Taller QB’s would do better in the WCO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
knownone":tumrcgpl said:It wasn't just that he was above criticism. Didn't Russell ask Pete to stop allowing the defense to talk smack to him in practice? There was an article about that the year Sherman left. At the time, I thought it was just sour grapes, but a lot of their complaints have seemingly come true.mistaowen":tumrcgpl said:Unless this all stems from those rumors awhile ago that Russ was above criticism, too close to the FO, etc and the locker room didn’t like that. So now that’s he’s upset with them and looking to leave, they’re laughing/saying told you so?
This 30 for 30 in 10 years talking about the Seahawks after the Pats SB loss will be must watch TV haha
For example, they said Russ cared more about his brand than the team. They said if he didn't get his way, he would go behind your back and tell on you. The whole article frames Russell as the problem with Pete enabling his diva-like behavior. It was all laughable at the time, but the fact that it's even somewhat relevant today is crazy. I always thought Sherman was the problem. Now, I'm not so sure. That 30-30 needs to be made tomorrow. I can't wait 10 years for the potential Wilson heel-turn.