I'm a geno hater but Yes we would have won the sb vs broncos and won vs pats as well with geno!! We won in spite of russ in the early years! He threw 4 picks in the nfc Championship vs the Packers and threw the most famous and worst interception in nfl history vs new England. With geno or Flynn we have at least 2 sbs
If you're talking about just Super Bowl 48 by itself...yeah, we
probably win that game, even with NY Jets model Geno. But it gets dicey.
People often forget how on fire Russ was that day. We were an awful spot on our first drive, and a great defensive play in the end zone on our second drive, from being able to score TDs on pretty much every possession during the first three quarters. We scored every time we got the ball, and never gave the Donkeys a chance to catch their breath.
Flynn or Geno winning two Super Bowls with us? Watch the Tarvaris 2011 season over again, and you'll see what a silly idea that is. You can even skip the first eight games and start with the upset over Baltimore. See how we can't get the one additional score we need in the Redskins, 49ers, and Cardinals games. Then watch our great defense choke in the clutch with a playoff berth on the line. That team wins zero rings without Russ.
Let's say Geno is our QB for Super Bowl 49. If he gets that same exact formation and play call from Pete and Darrell Bevell on 2nd and Goal, why do you think it would go any better?
Russ sucked against the Packers in the NFC Championship, that's true. But two of those picks were Kearse's fault for not being able to make tough catches in traffic. Did Pete and John have those plays in mind when they made the Jimmy Graham trade?