I hear what you are saying, but it is kind of a catch-22 all around.You pay Geno if a near .500 record is important to you. Geno will keep you competitive, but he will also strip your roster because you won't be able to pay people you need.
So sign Geno if you feel you must but be aware that squeaking into the wildcard game (occasionally) and getting bounced regularly in that game will be your future.
You will rarely, if ever, win another playoff game until the impact of his contract sheds off - and by that time his impact will be less too because he will be older.
If Geno is smart, he takes a lesser contract like a mid-level starter or even less, and goes to a team like the Dolphins or even Baltimore (he would fail in Baltimore but the Fins could win with him if Tua does not return). Find a team that is solid but just needs a QB. That ain't us.
Then again, I imagine that Pete could do whatever he did with Geno with another QB. So yet another reason not to pay him big money.
NOTE:
But if we pay Geno, might as well bone up on how the Vikings are doing. It isn't a terrible fate. But the Vikings are an example of what happens to teams that pay market rate for middle of the road QBs. It strips their roster and they stay a solid regular season team that really has no future in the playoffs. We would basically be the Seattle Vikings. Again not a terrible fate. High floor but low ceiling. Fun to watch in the regular season, occasionally makes the playoffs. Not really any kind of contender, nor will they be.
Debating isn’t hating. Some people love to have a good cry about it though.He moves and throws just fine on the run. Haters gonna hate...![]()
If I were you I would get this message to Jody right away, I bet she has no idea the outlook is so grim and only you with your vast knowledge can save the franchise..You pay Geno if a near .500 record is important to you. Geno will keep you competitive, but he will also strip your roster because you won't be able to pay people you need.
So sign Geno if you feel you must but be aware that squeaking into the wildcard game (occasionally) and getting bounced regularly in that game will be your future.
You will rarely, if ever, win another playoff game until the impact of his contract sheds off - and by that time his impact will be less too because he will be older.
If Geno is smart, he takes a lesser contract like a mid-level starter or even less, and goes to a team like the Dolphins or even Baltimore (he would fail in Baltimore but the Fins could win with him if Tua does not return). Find a team that is solid but just needs a QB. That ain't us.
Then again, I imagine that Pete could do whatever he did with Geno with another QB. So yet another reason not to pay him big money.
NOTE:
But if we pay Geno, might as well bone up on how the Vikings are doing. It isn't a terrible fate. But the Vikings are an example of what happens to teams that pay market rate for middle of the road QBs. It strips their roster and they stay a solid regular season team that really has no future in the playoffs. We would basically be the Seattle Vikings. Again not a terrible fate. High floor but low ceiling. Fun to watch in the regular season, occasionally makes the playoffs. Not really any kind of contender, nor will they be.
Im glad that this team you thought was trash and wouldn’t be anything gave you a reason to make a playoff game post. Clown.Some of us dont like getting bounced in the first round constantly and thats what Pete Carroll and Geno Smith gives you.
Blame Pete comes right back. F sake. Well known had holes coming in. 3 starting rookie CB’s that played their ass off. This team can compete now and even more next year with the picks and cap space. Should have drafted Willis last year too right just to fill a position all while being the worst QB draft class in history at that position.If PC stays, the Defense will still suck and the ceiling will be a slight chance of winning a wild card game.
What's the point of spending big $ on a QB to get a few more wins in a rebuilding season?
Go with low dollar Lock and draft a QB to develop. Use 2023 to get your 8 rookies some experience and evaluate your needs for 2024 while rolling over big cap $ to 2024 for free agents to fill holes. The Seahawks may be able to compete in 2024 if they are smart with 2023 spending (including dumping overpriced, underproductive players and eating the dead money now).
They just landed 3 solid rookie CB’s in the draft.Meh he had so many turnover worthy throws the second half of the year. Someone tracks those and his were really high. And I still fall back on the bad cap numbers right now it’s at 46 million, you’re not fixing the defense in year one with one draft unless you hit a home run and their track record isn’t very good at building the defense.
Of course I "blame Pete". He's the one who has failed utterly in rebuilding this Defense.Blame Pete comes right back. F sake. Well known had holes coming in. 3 starting rookie CB’s that played their ass off. This team can compete now and even more next year with the picks and cap space. Should have drafted Willis last year too right just to fill a position all while being the worst QB draft class in history at that position.
They nailed this last draft and my hope is they changed the process. The last few drafts have been fairly badThey just landed 3 solid rookie CB’s in the draft.
I wouldn't give Geno a huge contract. His 10 Year History says otherwise. Maybe if he goes beyond what he did this year next year I'd be more on board.Bullshit ^
You're not even qualifying your statement with HOW MUCH Geno will come back to play for.
He's a Pro-bowl level Quarterback who's earned a decent effing payday, and YOU don't really even know what his demands will be.
One thing's for certain He is a KNOWN QUANTITY, and an UPGRADE to what we had with Russell Wilson.
Some of y'all are acting like he can be EASILY replaced with a ' Pig in a Poke' Draft pick, and that's the definition of DELUSIONAL.
And you're a nitpicker and a spin doctor. We all have our talents..Debating isn’t hating. Some people love to have a good cry about it though.
You love pissing matches. I’ll give you back to the folks you normally get your showers from.
Fair perspective.Meh he had so many turnover worthy throws the second half of the year. Someone tracks those and his were really high. And I still fall back on the bad cap numbers right now it’s at 46 million, you’re not fixing the defense in year one with one draft unless you hit a home run and their track record isn’t very good at building the defense.
And likewise, I can be talked into it very easily and if you ask me tomorrow I might do a 180 lol.Fair perspective.
Geno leads the league in interceptable passes; however, most came in games where we're playing from behind (PFF's data). So the question for Pete and John is whether Geno was at fault or whether he was trying to compensate for a fledgling defense. It seems how you answer that question determines where you fall on re-signing Geno or not.
I haven't looked at the salary cap situation in any depth yet. But we won 9 games with a bottom 25 defense, which included several rookies and inexperienced players. So while I agree that we probably can't fix the defense in one year, I do expect a dramatic improvement in one offseason. And if they don't improve, it's time to move on from Pete.
Since the salary cap was installed in 1994, the highest QB cap hit percentage for a Super Bowl winner was 13.1%. That was in the inaugural year, for Steve Young of the San Francisco 49ers. He was, of course, working on a contract that predated the cap. - https://bookies.com/nfl/picks/nfl-qb-contract-trends-what-is-the-optimal-cap-hit-to-win-a-super-bowl
Probably too socialistic for most peeps around here.I wonder what would happen if the nfl implemented a salary cap that listed max payable/earned by positional allowance. IOW starting QB is payed $X, backup QB is payed $X, and so on down the line for every position. All players receive the same benefit package, Head coach earns $X etc.
It would be interesting to see how equality would effect the pattern of standings results over a period of time if teams were not allowed to buy their way into a superior team for a year only to see it crumble the next.
Would that system eliminate dynasties? Or would it produce more of them?