Cyrus12
Well-known member
Or will there be any good ones left by then?
Agreed. Not sure if this was their guy or they couldn't find a trade partner, but I would imagine they wanted to trade into the 35-45 range, pick up a RB and then go defense with pick 59 and 64, at least that's how I mocked them a few times doing.Osprey":2l44i5hm said:Think the run will hit before our pick and don’t see them giving up picks to move up.
Had they been able to trade down out of R1, I think they would have.
Seahawk_Dan":2n55s5m8 said:Agreed. Not sure if this was their guy or they couldn't find a trade partner, but I would imagine they wanted to trade into the 35-45 range, pick up a RB and then go defense with pick 59 and 64, at least that's how I mocked them a few times doing.Osprey":2n55s5m8 said:Think the run will hit before our pick and don’t see them giving up picks to move up.
Had they been able to trade down out of R1, I think they would have.
Not speaking for Dan, but what I was saying is that if they got enough value out of trading down they assume Brooks will be gone before their pick.seabowl":2s2fcz40 said:Seahawk_Dan":2s2fcz40 said:Agreed. Not sure if this was their guy or they couldn't find a trade partner, but I would imagine they wanted to trade into the 35-45 range, pick up a RB and then go defense with pick 59 and 64, at least that's how I mocked them a few times doing.Osprey":2s2fcz40 said:Think the run will hit before our pick and don’t see them giving up picks to move up.
Had they been able to trade down out of R1, I think they would have.
What you are saying is they would have traded down and if Brooks was there 35+ they would have passed on him for a rb? Does not sound logical.
Seahawk_Dan":24jkuwtz said:Agreed. Not sure if this was their guy or they couldn't find a trade partner, but I would imagine they wanted to trade into the 35-45 range, pick up a RB and then go defense with pick 59 and 64, at least that's how I mocked them a few times doing.Osprey":24jkuwtz said:Think the run will hit before our pick and don’t see them giving up picks to move up.
Had they been able to trade down out of R1, I think they would have.
This is fair, especially since there is a lot of chatter that one or two other teams were looking to get Brooks. Clearly the FO knows what they're doing, or hear/see things that others aren't aware of, it's just most (including me) think that Edge or RB is most important position to pick up, but it seems that Pete and Co are looking at LB to rebuild at and maybe RB comes with their next pick at 59? My concern is, whose left at that point?Osprey":36zp9fek said:Not speaking for Dan, but what I was saying is that if they got enough value out of trading down they assume Brooks will be gone before their pick.seabowl":36zp9fek said:Seahawk_Dan":36zp9fek said:Agreed. Not sure if this was their guy or they couldn't find a trade partner, but I would imagine they wanted to trade into the 35-45 range, pick up a RB and then go defense with pick 59 and 64, at least that's how I mocked them a few times doing.Osprey":36zp9fek said:Think the run will hit before our pick and don’t see them giving up picks to move up.
Had they been able to trade down out of R1, I think they would have.
What you are saying is they would have traded down and if Brooks was there 35+ they would have passed on him for a rb? Does not sound logical.
With the hypothetical new arrangement of picks (Dan’s 35-45 range) RB is now the highest value. Clearly at 27 they saw Brooks as the best value.