Dear Mr. Bevell

OP
OP
Largent80

Largent80

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
36,653
Reaction score
5
Location
The Tex-ASS
Every game this season was "each game is a championship". Well, guess what?...That is finally true...

So lets use the read option a little, and maybe a wr/hb pass.
 

RolandDeschain

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
33,274
Reaction score
1,146
Location
Orlando, FL...for good.
TwistedHusky":1dmqtgtr said:
Thank god.

Before almost every win, we had a running "Bevel sucks" thread and without it I was worried we were tempting fate before the game.

Honestly, if Bevell wins us a SB, for the next two years he could sit on the sideline in a lawn chair and watch porn all game while letting an "assistant" playing Madden call plays for us. I wouldn't care, he would have earned it.

But until he does, he still sucks.
I love your implication that if we win the Super Bowl, it's because of Bevell.

Jesus...
 

Seahaaaawks

New member
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
1,641
Reaction score
0
Location
Medford Oregon
If I can predict our playcalls from my couch, I'm sure the other teams can predict them as well. The trend goes a little like this... Hand off, hand off, 3rd and long shotgun pass while the defense blitz, punt! My fingers are crossed
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,109
Reaction score
1,279
"I love your implication that if we win the Super Bowl, it's because of Bevell."

Our defense got us to the SB and deserves the bulk of the credit. But if we win it, I would have to give him at least "some" credit even if I would have earlier joined the "Bevell Haters FanClub" if such a thing existed.

The guy drives me nuts, and I think we have a lot of underutilized offensive talent. But if we win it, I won't care because I will owe anyone on that team for helping bring about one of the greatest moments in Seattle sports history.
 

seahawksny

Active member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
1,614
Reaction score
5
Seahaaaawks":b4neqohw said:
It seemed our playbook was wide open the first half of the year, then closed and predictable the second half of the year.. Also Wilson stopped running the ball about mid-season as well. I did not see him take a hit while running this year. He is very good at picking up the yards then sliding or running out of bounds. Sure would like to see him run again...

This is my biggest concern and am still wondering why we veered from that.
 

seahawksny

Active member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
1,614
Reaction score
5
Seahaaaawks":1n7d8doe said:
It seemed our playbook was wide open the first half of the year, then closed and predictable the second half of the year.. Also Wilson stopped running the ball about mid-season as well. I did not see him take a hit while running this year. He is very good at picking up the yards then sliding or running out of bounds. Sure would like to see him run again...

This is my biggest concern and am still wondering why we veered from that.
 

Zebulon Dak

Banned
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
24,551
Reaction score
1,417
I'm sure Bevell's working super hard right now just trying to find ways to underwhelm you bunch of know-nothings.

:salute:
 
OP
OP
Largent80

Largent80

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
36,653
Reaction score
5
Location
The Tex-ASS
When we lost Rice, we lost our tallest play making WR. Couple that with the defenses we faced and it was decided that we would rely on the strengths we had left, which is running.

Now is the time to release the Kraken.

[youtube]spfpSIyt4qc[/youtube]
 

AF_Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
2,377
Reaction score
91
Zebulon Dak":1cn0q44i said:
I'm sure Bevell's working super hard right now just trying to find ways to underwhelm you bunch of know-nothings.

:salute:

When things go wrong, we know who to blame ;)
 

Zebulon Dak

Banned
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
24,551
Reaction score
1,417
AF_Hawk":1u0yqow2 said:
Zebulon Dak":1u0yqow2 said:
I'm sure Bevell's working super hard right now just trying to find ways to underwhelm you bunch of know-nothings.

:salute:

When things go wrong, we know who to blame ;)

:thirishdrinkers:
 

RolandDeschain

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
33,274
Reaction score
1,146
Location
Orlando, FL...for good.
Zebulon Dak":8vhs39k7 said:
I'm sure Bevell's working super hard right now just trying to find ways to underwhelm you bunch of know-nothings.

:salute:
I'm sure Zeb's working super hard right now promoting the awesomeness of Bevell. :)
 

sam1313

New member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
1
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
TwistedHusky":3upuzmvz said:
Thank god.

Before almost every win, we had a running "Bevel sucks" thread and without it I was worried we were tempting fate before the game.

Honestly, if Bevell wins us a SB, for the next two years he could sit on the sideline in a lawn chair and watch porn all game while letting an "assistant" playing Madden call plays for us. I wouldn't care, he would have earned it.

But until he does, he still sucks.

That was one of the most awesome posts of all time. Well done Twisted!
 

m0ng0

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
4,721
Reaction score
1,149
Location
Vancouver, Wa
like it or not Bevell is part of the reason we are still talking about this team, and if he does well he could parlay this into a top college coaching job or something :D
 

Tokadub

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Messages
964
Reaction score
12
Initially I was thinking if we score over 24 points we will win. The more I think about, it seems like we might need more, or we will need to do very well in our time of possession.

If you noticed, even though Denver scored only 26 against the Patriots, I honestly believe their game plan did not involve scoring a ton of points. I think their game plan was to simply control and dictate the game.

The Broncos had 2 drives over 7 minutes in the game resulting in a score:

2nd quarter: 7 minutes 1 seconds Touchdown drive
3rd quarter: 7 minutes 8 seconds Touchdown drive
4th quarter: 5 minutes 23 seconds Field Goal.

That's nearly 20 minutes in just 3 drives!!! Almost 1/3 the game gone on 3 drives!

I think their game plan was to take control of the game offensively with long, high percentage drives that ate up the clock. They did not want to get into a high scoring shootout with the Patriots. They trusted their defense to make enough stops to win if they could limit their time on the field. And it worked brilliantly, they completely shut down the Patriots never letting Brady get in a groove to win the game (they also benefited from Brady missing some very important throws).

Time of possession:

Broncos: 35 minutes 44 seconds
Patriots: 24 minutes 16 seconds


For comparison in our last game some of our drives time of possession were:

1-2nd quarters: 5 minutes 54 seconds Punt...
2nd quarter: 4 minutes 16 seconds Field Goal
3rd quarter: 2 minutes 15 seconds Touch Down
3rd quarter: 2 minutes 34 seconds Field Goal
3rd-4th quarter: 4 minute 2 seconds Touch Down
4th quarter: 4 minute Field Goal

In comparison to the Broncos having 3 drives for close to 20 minutes, in our last game our longest drive appears to have resulted in a punt. If you add our longest drive of the game to our 5 scoring drives you have 6 drives totaling about 22 minutes 30 seconds.

So the Broncos had the ball nearly as long as we did in this specific example with 1/2 the number of drives.

Seahawks: 31 minutes 28 seconds
49ers: 28 minutes 32 seconds

One could argue that if the Seahawks lost the time of possession we could have easily lost against the 49ers since it was a very close game.


So what's the point of all this time analysis?

Well, I believe this will be a key statistic for the winning team.

Against the Saints the Seahawks actually lost the time of possession:

Seahawks: 29 minutes 30 seconds
Saints: 30 minutes 30 seconds

What about the Broncos in their Divisional match up?

Broncos: 35 minutes 27 seconds
Chargers: 24 minutes 33 seconds


According to this stat site:

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/av ... -net-of-ot

The Broncos for the regular season were ranked 10th in time of possession with an average of 30 minutes 38 seconds.

The Seahawks were seemingly not too far behind ranked 17th averaging 29 minutes 57 seconds.

I was very surprised when I first learned the Seahawks were losing the time of possession battle on average this season. For such a run heavy offense, with a dominating defense, it's really quite inexcusable that we can't hold onto the ball for more than 30 minutes on average.

Last season (2012) both the Seahawks and Broncos average time of possession were identical at 31 minutes 24 second which was tied for 4th.


People have been seemingly very surprised that the Broncos have scored less in the playoffs, but their defense has also "stepped up" allowing only 16 and 17 points in the last two games.

But did the Broncos defense really step up? Or could their success be due to the Broncos holding onto the ball for an average of over 35 minutes 30 seconds the past two games?


The Patriots had 0 turnovers against the Broncos and still only had the ball for 24 minutes 16 seconds.

The Chargers had 0 turnovers against the Broncos, while the Broncos had two turnovers, a fumble (onside kick for fumble?) and interception. Yet even with being +2 in the turnover margin the Chargers time of possession was a pathetic 24 minutes 33 seconds.


Conclusion:

The Broncos have recognized that their defense is not up too par, no matter how good their offense is they can lose games with their defense. BUT, they also decided that if they focus their entire game plan around time of possession they can win quite easily if it works. The Broncos offense is perfect for slow and steady first downs. They are capable of very long drives of around 7 minutes on a consistent basis against most teams.

If the Broncos can keep the Seahawks time of possession to under 25 minutes like they have done to their last two opponents, they should be able to win very easily. Of course this will be more difficult against the Seahawks Defense, however it may be quite easy to stuff our Offense which could balance this out. Bevell will need to call a very good game with high percentage first downs to counter this. Our team will need better offensive execution than what we've seen lately. We need to look like the team scoring 50 points last season if we want this to be an easy win. Russel will need to be in peak form which I have faith he will be.

And we better have a fully comprehensive and effective high percentage offensive plan with or without Harvin, when Harvin went down against the Saints we looked quite clueless but perhaps it was just the weather. In this game we need to be prepared or even expecting Harvin to get knocked out of the game the first time he touches the ball. It's not necessarily that I think that will happen, but we need to be ready for it and have an amazing game plan with or without him.
 
Top