Winning is a bad argument for a single players merits. Especially when said player has an elite running game, and elite defense to fall back on.
It is intellectually lazy to keep using this argument . Couldn't you say its easy being a great defense when you have a QB who doesn't turn the ball over and can bail you out when needed(See Atl playoff game) How many last second game winning drives did the defense give up last year? Or couldn't I also say Lynch is so good because of the threat of Wilson? A lot of our running success is predicated by the read option and the threat of Wilson running. Wilson has more game winning drives in his short career than ARod does in his career. Is that solely because of the defense? Or Lynch? Wilson is a great football player. So is Lynch and so is the defense. They aren't mutually exclusive. I'm not saying the defense/Lynch are only good because of Wilson, I'm only pointing out the ridiculousness of the original argument. They all help each other. It's like saying Rodgers is only good because he has two all pro receivers, Manning is only good because he's always had an elite wr group or any other example.
I think you're honestly trolling to get a response from people which is lame but carry on if you feel the need.
Edit added: I'm a huge Hasselbeck fan. One of my favorite all time Seahawks but to say he is better than Wilson is baffling to me. Pains me a little to even have to argue against Hass! :shock: You can have a differing opinion and I love a good debate as much as anyone but you seem to throw it out there every chance you get even in threads that don't really warrant a debate. This was a thread about appreciating what Wilson is, not a thread discussing his place in Seahawks QB history. So tough to think you're not trolling when you don't respect time/place with this issue.