James in PA
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 7,724
- Reaction score
- 10,052
Well, it's not quite bad as Chuck Barkley spitting on that little girl back in the day. These Philly sports figures love them some spitting.
Dak spit AT him then gave a knowing grin. Only Carter getting in trouble here is some BS. This is why we need AI referees that can see everything so things can be a lot more fair, rather than the usual "only he who retaliates gets in trouble" garbage.
Dak spit AT him then gave a knowing grin. Only Carter getting in trouble here is some BS. This is why we need AI referees that can see everything so things can be a lot more fair, rather than the usual "only he who retaliates gets in trouble" garbage.
Thats sort of what I meantIMO, DK did plenty of stupid stuff.
I don’t recall ever seeing him do something outright “dirty”.
Maybe I missed it, IDK
No disrespect here…and I do respect your opinion.I agree that Carter needs to control himself better, but the narrative that it's 100% his fault and nothing triggered it is factually false, you have to assign SOME portion of blame to Dak for clearly instigating it. This is in general, how all situations "escalate". You can't just lay 100% of fault on the person who "escalates last" or "escalates most harshly".
I agree that Carter needs to control himself better, but the narrative that it's 100% his fault and nothing triggered it is factually false, you have to assign SOME portion of blame to Dak for clearly instigating it. This is in general, how all situations "escalate". You can't just lay 100% of fault on the person who "escalates last" or "escalates most harshly".
I agree. Not knowing what was said in the exchange (none of us do), I'd put the degree of blame for the incident 95% on Carter and 5% on Dak.I agree that Carter needs to control himself better, but the narrative that it's 100% his fault and nothing triggered it is factually false, you have to assign SOME portion of blame to Dak for clearly instigating it. This is in general, how all situations "escalate". You can't just lay 100% of fault on the person who "escalates last" or "escalates most harshly".
I agree. Not knowing what was said in the exchange (none of us do), I'd put the degree of blame for the incident 95% on Carter and 5% on Dak.
If they let Dak off Scot free with not so much as a token fine, they'd be endorsing provocative behavior, baiting players into a PF. We saw this happen with Metcalf, where opponents knew he was thin skinned and took advantage of it. Heck, Richard Sherman must have had a PhD in Psychology with the way he could bait other players. It's the type of behavior that the league has specifically called out this season.
We can go round and round with this, so I'll end my part in this discussion by saying this:I’ll reiterate.
We can’t control what other people do.
We have 100% control over how we react to what other people do.
IMO, if Dak broke a rule he should receive whatever is deemed appropriate for it.
To place blame on Dak for how Carter reacted is ludicrous.
Carter had the option to walk away from whatever Dak did, he chose to spit on him.
*I don’t care anything about Dak but this is not a defend yourself from a life/death situation.
We can go round and round with this, so I'll end my part in this discussion by saying this:
1. None of us know what words were exchanged between Carter and Dak, but we do know that words were exchanged, and the fact that it ended with Carter spitting on him almost certainly means that Dak's words were not of a complimentary nature.
2. The incident started well before most of the one or two second videos we've seen that show Carter spitting on Dak. Both Dak as well as Carter could have ended the exchange almost immediately by ignoring the other, turn around and join their teammates. Here's a summary along with a video:
video dak carter - Search Videos
Watch videos instantly on Bing—enjoy direct playback, discover related clips, and dive into trending content all in one place.www.bing.com
3. The league has made it a point of emphasis that they'll be cracking down on unsportsmanlike behavior and taunting. I would be surprised if the league did not hold Dak at least partially responsible for the exchange. I'll bet you a beer that Dak receives at least a token fine.
4. It takes two to Tango. I don't know of very many one-on-one confrontations that weren't at least partially provoked by the other. People don't sucker punch another simply because they don't like how they look. Yes, random acts like sucker punches do happen, but such occasions are few and far between.
5. Let's agree to disagree.
Damn, I'm going to have to break my pledge to leave the subject alone. But I can't let this last comment go without a reply.So am I understanding you correctly?
Words that were or may have been said justify Carter spitting on Prescott?
If so, what happened to “sticks and stones”?
Agree to disagree?
If that’s the best we can do, I suppose we’ll have to.
Damn, I'm going to have to break my pledge to leave the subject alone. But I can't let this last comment go without a reply.
I did NOT say that Carter was justified in spitting on Dak. I'm saying the exact opposite. I said earlier that Carter was 95% responsible for the incident, meaning that he wasn't justified, and to use an analogy, his reaction would be like a cop shooting out the tires of a car doing 30mph in a 25mph zone. Carter went way, way overboard in his retaliation, which is why he was suspended and Dak to this point hasn't faced any discipline.
Are you willing to bet a beer on Dak getting at least a token fine?
I agree that Carter needs to control himself better, but the narrative that it's 100% his fault and nothing triggered it is factually false, you have to assign SOME portion of blame to Dak for clearly instigating it. This is in general, how all situations "escalate". You can't just lay 100% of fault on the person who "escalates last" or "escalates most harshly".