Raiders and Geno reach an agreement

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
8,974
Reaction score
2,633
17.5 million of Darnold's guaranteed money becomes fully guaranteed a week after the Super Bowl for 2026 if he's healthy.

PS> You're right about his dead money hit of 37.5 million after the coming season. Yes, it would cost the Hawks that.
37.5 is not 40 plus, which can be spread out over 2 seasons right?
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
9,105
Location
Cockeysville, Md
The crazy thing about geno beating them out was that the other two never got a chance to develop and see what could be. Geno is all the way at his peak we know what it is, but he was just good enough to take the job from two undeveloped prospects
To say we have seen the best of what Geno is is like saying halfway through Rich Gannon's career that we saw the best of who he was.

Take away the qb over the last three years. Its been abysmal because the coordinators were utterly and undisputably garbage.

How good do you think KC is if you take away Andy Reid and sub in Shane Waldron to call plays.

How good do you think Detroit is if you replace Johnson with Grubb?

This is the elelphant in the room that everyone who wants to frame Geno refuses to acknowledge. You can have enough talent to compete. If its led by incompetent coordinators it will be lost.

Let's see what Geno's season looks like now outside of Seattle with a competent HC AND OC vs Darnold's here in Seattle.
 

ruffENrowdy

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
331
Reaction score
263
Location
Lewiston, ID
To say we have seen the best of what Geno is is like saying halfway through Rich Gannon's career that we saw the best of who he was.

Take away the qb over the last three years. Its been abysmal because the coordinators were utterly and undisputably garbage.

How good do you think KC is if you take away Andy Reid and sub in Shane Waldron to call plays.

How good do you think Detroit is if you replace Johnson with Grubb?

This is the elelphant in the room that everyone who wants to frame Geno refuses to acknowledge. You can have enough talent to compete. If its led by incompetent coordinators it will be lost.

Let's see what Geno's season looks like now outside of Seattle with a competent HC AND OC vs Darnold's here in Seattle.
He will be the same Geno lol. I'm glad he's gone, and bow he is proving to be a whiny baby. Good riddance geNO
 

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
2,917
Reaction score
1,851
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
To say we have seen the best of what Geno is is like saying halfway through Rich Gannon's career that we saw the best of who he was.

Take away the qb over the last three years. Its been abysmal because the coordinators were utterly and undisputably garbage.

How good do you think KC is if you take away Andy Reid and sub in Shane Waldron to call plays.

How good do you think Detroit is if you replace Johnson with Grubb?

This is the elelphant in the room that everyone who wants to frame Geno refuses to acknowledge. You can have enough talent to compete. If its led by incompetent coordinators it will be lost.

Let's see what Geno's season looks like now outside of Seattle with a competent HC AND OC vs Darnold's here in Seattle.
So at 32, with multiple coordinators that have never elevated him, geno is not at his peak and still has his greatest accomplishments ahead of him… go raiders. Let’s loot
 

Ostatehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
1,130
Reaction score
1,381
To say we have seen the best of what Geno is is like saying halfway through Rich Gannon's career that we saw the best of who he was.

Take away the qb over the last three years. Its been abysmal because the coordinators were utterly and undisputably garbage.

How good do you think KC is if you take away Andy Reid and sub in Shane Waldron to call plays.

How good do you think Detroit is if you replace Johnson with Grubb?

This is the elelphant in the room that everyone who wants to frame Geno refuses to acknowledge. You can have enough talent to compete. If its led by incompetent coordinators it will be lost.

Let's see what Geno's season looks like now outside of Seattle with a competent HC AND OC vs Darnold's here in Seattle.
You may well be right Keas.

But I have a hard time believing the Raiders aren't going to continue their dumpster fire ways. They are almost as big a train wreck as the cowboys from an ownership standpoint; and they were - and most assuredly still are - miles away from relevancy. Coaching and Geno are not going to magically fix what is a systemic problem in Oakland (yeah, yeah las vegas - whatever - same mess different kitchen).

And this - I can't even.

1744216020162
 

HawkRiderFan

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
1,187
As far as the superior coaching Geno will get in LV, Pete was outstanding for us from the first part of his run. How about the last couple of years? How about the fact through the later years of his run, the D got worse? And as for better coaching on the OC, we are just going to assume that Kelly due to his earlier NFL run and recent success at the college level will be fine now in the NFL?
 

Scout

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2021
Messages
1,988
Reaction score
2,349
Kelly is more balanced with his play calling approach now, so I think Kelly will be fine an OC as we know he can create very good scheme designs.. Graham is underrated as a DC and Pete is lucky to land a DC of his talents in his lap. Spytek has a lot of work to do to bring in talent for the Raiders but I think the Raiders will surprise people this year.

That defense for the Raiders has enough players already on their roster for multiple fronts to confuse offenses. A front of Crosby, Wilkins, Koonce, Bulter and Fotu will be tough to deal with. The back end has enough veteran players but they really needs a true #1 CB.

On offense they really just need a true #1 WR and adding another RB to the mix. Beyond that is depth and upgrading rotational depth. The Raiders are not as bad as people assume.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,434
Reaction score
12,654
Location
Delaware
Kelly is more balanced with his play calling approach now, so I think Kelly will be fine an OC as we know he can create very good scheme designs.. Graham is underrated as a DC and Pete is lucky to land a DC of his talents in his lap. Spytek has a lot of work to do to bring in talent for the Raiders but I think the Raiders will surprise people this year.

That defense for the Raiders has enough players already on their roster for multiple fronts to confuse offenses. A front of Crosby, Wilkins, Koonce, Bulter and Fotu will be tough to deal with. The back end has enough veteran players but they really needs a true #1 CB.

On offense they really just need a true #1 WR and adding another RB to the mix. Beyond that is depth and upgrading rotational depth. The Raiders are not as bad as people assume.
That roster has massive upside on it already. They've got cap, some roster cornerstones, young talent, and good draft capital.

I really do see them being competitive fairly quickly. Getting Chip some stud skill position guys and PG some defensive reinforcements would have them in really nice shape.

PC is the ultimate "let's build something great" coach and I think starting fresh with an organization in desperate need of culture overhaul is ideal for him. He rises to those occasions. Tom Brady calling football shots in the building... the Raiders acquired a lot of greatness this off-season.

I dunno. Put it this way: if you wanted an ideal team to rebuild in Madden, the Raiders are that team. No question. Just set up so well.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,434
Reaction score
12,654
Location
Delaware
As far as the superior coaching Geno will get in LV, Pete was outstanding for us from the first part of his run. How about the last couple of years? How about the fact through the later years of his run, the D got worse? And as for better coaching on the OC, we are just going to assume that Kelly due to his earlier NFL run and recent success at the college level will be fine now in the NFL?
Chip Kelly wasn't that bad in the NFL. Nick Foles tossed 27 TDs to 2 INTs in his offense. He took over a 4-12 team and went 10-6 in the subsequent 2 seasons.

He wasn't a good GM (he took over roster control in Philly in 2015 and it wasn't great), but even then, he was fired with the team being 6-9 and not outright terrible.

SF was an impossible task, though. Trent Baalke was still the GM and was essentially sabotaging his 3rd coach in 3 years.

I wouldn't say that considering Chip Kelly an elite OC is a stretch. He's got one of the longest track records around to back it up. Great playcaller and scheme brilliance.
 

HawkRiderFan

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
1,187
I think people are being too quick to assume just cause Brady was the best or one of of the best ever to play QB and a future hall of famer that it will automatically translate into greatness in the front office. Sports is littered with great players who didn't find success at the coaching or management level. Maybe he will, but we don't know.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
40,591
Reaction score
2,918
Location
Roy Wa.
Pete has great energy that motivates and is contagious, if he maintains "ALWAYS COMPETE" and doesn't compromise it like here he could get the Raiders to over perform out of the gate, that momentum could carry over. Raiders have historically been the team that plays with a chip on their shoulder, if they get that mentality back they could do some damage. They as stated are not void of talent, but are void of cohesiveness and a unified purpose. Pete is good about bring that together.
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
9,105
Location
Cockeysville, Md
So at 32, with multiple coordinators that have never elevated him, geno is not at his peak and still has his greatest accomplishments ahead of him… go raiders. Let’s loot
Which coordinator that he has had was capable of elevating his play? He credited working behind Manning and Rivers with sharpening his process and ability as a player. But he was never going to get a shot to actually replace either of them. And it was Manning in NY who basically said as much - that Geno got a raw deal when he actually did get a chance to start.

Lets not pretend that Waldron and Grubb were actually capable of elevating anything more than a coffee mug at breakfast. Waldron was inept and Grubbs stint has been summarily described as QB unfriendly in how stupidly predictable the passing concept were, how non existent the run game was, and how the net result was a scheme that made the QBS job HARDER, not easier.

Its funny. Geno comes here and is basically run out of town on .NET before he even played a snap. But then, with little run game, less protection, and no defense, he plays well enough to garner MVP talk, and he did all of the with WALDRON. A guy who cant even get a job as coordinator.

Now, Sam comes here after having started in NY, (like Geno), having floundered every he went, and then landing in a spot with a GREAT coordinator who was UNDOUBTEDLY responsible for his success, ok run game, decent line and defense and he is seen as potentially a great get... as good as Geno ??

Talk about a double standard.

But its heaven sent. because now after 4 years of residual hurt over Russ being replaced by Geno and Geno being the whipping boy for all things wrong with the offense and the reason we cant 'elevate', we have a guy who has walked a similar line as Smith, who gets all of the acclaim and none of the arrows. He is stepping into a better team that wont rely on him doing near what Geno did. Lets see how it goes. Finally, apples to apples.
 

Latest posts

Top