James in PA
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 6,636
- Reaction score
- 7,648
He did indeed say this and it pisses me off every time I think about it. That philosophy is why I don't think he will ever get the job done.
He did indeed say this and it pisses me off every time I think about it. That philosophy is why I don't think he will ever get the job done.
JS hasn't valued interior o-line for years. I mean the man put Dee Eskridge above Creed Humphrey on his draft board.He did indeed say this and it pisses me off every time I think about it. That philosophy is why I don't think he will ever get the job done.
The timing was a huge factor, IIRC. We had to wait for MMac to become available, i.e., Ravens lost in the playoffs, and by then a lot of top staff coaches had been snapped up. MMac and JS had to work with what was still available.He was certainly not immune to criticism in other venues.
Forget about the roster; the Seahawks looked dysfunctional this offseason. John said they fired Pete for underperforming with the current roster and then went out and got a young head coach. Fine. Do they pair him with an experienced NFL staff? No. The staff is filled with young guys who've either a) never been a coordinator (DC) or b) never been an NFL coordinator (ST, OC).
Seattle is setting MM up to fail. They set high expectations before the season, gave him a very inexperienced support structure, and threw him to the wolves. It's almost like they are caught between two separate modes. Are they trying to contend or rebuild? It's unclear to me.
Part of that was Seattle's indecisiveness, though. They could have interviewed MM and begun to put a staff together much sooner, but they took too long to fire Pete and missed the WC window.The timing was a huge factor, IIRC. We had to wait for MMac to become available, i.e., Ravens lost in the playoffs, and by then a lot of top staff coaches had been snapped up. MMac and JS had to work with what was still available.
You may recall the timing specifics better than me. I was just happy we got MacDonald, he was my first choice. I think we need to give him a much longer leash than what some here are doing. I think Schneider gets a new shot clock of 2 years along with MMac. Pete built the Super Bowl teams based on cheap young O-Lines that could generate some push. Schneider, MMac, and Grubb haven't had much of a chance to bring in O-Line talent that fits their philosophy and wasn't from the scrap heap of other team's castoffs.Part of that was Seattle's indecisiveness, though. They could have interviewed MM and begun to put a staff together much sooner, but they took too long to fire Pete and missed the WC window.
Correlation is not causationSucking every year in the trenches and noting that John is the one constant isn't an overreaction. It's stating the obvious.
Gotcha. Seattle needed to request an interview with MM by the 10th or 11th of January, but they didn't fire Pete until the 10th, so they missed their window to interview him. A good comparison is Atlanta. They fired their coach the day the season ended (Jan 7th) and interviewed Macdonald three days later. They knew they were firing their coach and were quick to act. Seattle didn't even send out interview requests until the 15th, 8 days after the season ended. The front office looked unprepared to fire their head coach.You may recall the timing specifics better than me. I was just happy we got MacDonald, he was my first choice. I think we need to give him a much longer leash than what some here are doing. I think Schneider gets a new shot clock of 2 years along with MMac. Pete built the Super Bowl teams based on cheap young O-Lines that could generate some push. Schneider, MMac, and Grubb haven't had much of a chance to bring in O-Line talent that fits their philosophy and wasn't from the scrap heap of other team's castoffs.
Exactly. We can't run block for shit!
Do you have the quote where John said Pete was let go because he underperformed? I can't find it?He was certainly not immune to criticism in other venues.
Forget about the roster; the Seahawks looked dysfunctional this offseason. John said they fired Pete for underperforming with the current roster and then went out and got a young head coach. Fine. Do they pair him with an experienced NFL staff? No. The staff is filled with young guys who've either a) never been a coordinator (DC) or b) never been an NFL coordinator (ST, OC).
Seattle is setting MM up to fail. They set high expectations before the season, gave him a very inexperienced support structure, and threw him to the wolves. It's almost like they are caught between two separate modes. Are they trying to contend or rebuild? It's unclear to me.
Watch his first offseason press conference. Whenever he was asked why changes were made, he said the team underachieved.Do you have the quote where John said Pete was let go because he underperformed? I can't find it?
You must have missed the press conference after Pete was fired and it was laid out that JS had final say one everything.not saying he's not immune but you know that every single coach in the NFL has final say on players, right?
not saying he's not immune but you know that every single coach in the NFL has final say on players, right?
Slowdown brother... This is his first year without Pete and if you're not familiar, but Pete had draft & roster control for the longest time.. Give John & Mike time to develop before you call for hi head...I'm so sick of all the back-and-forth about Geno and MM. When does THIS GUY start getting some blame??
View attachment 67958
We moved on from ME3. We moved on from Pete. He's the only constant. I'm so sick and tired of this team getting pushed and shoved around and looking like complete garbage in the trenches. This is all on John. Sure, they have good individual pieces (who doesn't?). But this team is soft AF where it really counts. And the depth sucks too!