I guess this is why...

GeekHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
9,031
Reaction score
1,778
Location
Orting WA, Great Northwet

bigskydoc

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
4,845
Reaction score
2,260
Location
Kalispell, MT
Thanks for sharing. I was wondering about the effects of Tua's insurance policy on the Phin's salary cap. I have no problem with getting cap relief from these policies, although I can see an argument against it from the parity standpoint of it hitting the teams with the best players the hardest.

I do think the premiums should count against the cap, though. That would make things more equitable for the teams with owners who are merely rich.
 

chrispy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
1,444
A team could insure every player and each time one got hurt, the corresponding insurance amount would get added to the following year's Cap. The downside is that the insurance is a cost that's not re-coup'd, that is assuming the proceeds are spent on additional cap the next year. This system would allow a really rich owner to gain a lot of cap space. How it stands, it seems like teams make a decision on a (mostly) financial basis. If the system remains as is for a while, there will be more teams that spend in order to gain an advantage on cap calculations. It's just a matter of how much the owner is willing to decrease their profits in order to win.

If rumors about Bezos buying a (this) team turn out to be true, this could be a way to become more competitive quickly considering a limitless budget.
 

EverydayImRusselin

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
2,170
Reaction score
898
A team could insure every player and each time one got hurt, the corresponding insurance amount would get added to the following year's Cap. The downside is that the insurance is a cost that's not re-coup'd, that is assuming the proceeds are spent on additional cap the next year. This system would allow a really rich owner to gain a lot of cap space. How it stands, it seems like teams make a decision on a (mostly) financial basis. If the system remains as is for a while, there will be more teams that spend in order to gain an advantage on cap calculations. It's just a matter of how much the owner is willing to decrease their profits in order to win.

If rumors about Bezos buying a (this) team turn out to be true, this could be a way to become more competitive quickly considering a limitless budget.
I'm surprised this hasn't happened yet. In a league of parity, the competitive advantage that could be gained would be huge. Someone who is ultra wealthy, even by NFL owner standards could definitely break this system IMO.
 

Latest posts

Top