I guess this is why...

GeekHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
9,031
Reaction score
1,778
Location
Orting WA, Great Northwet

bigskydoc

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
4,845
Reaction score
2,260
Location
Kalispell, MT
Thanks for sharing. I was wondering about the effects of Tua's insurance policy on the Phin's salary cap. I have no problem with getting cap relief from these policies, although I can see an argument against it from the parity standpoint of it hitting the teams with the best players the hardest.

I do think the premiums should count against the cap, though. That would make things more equitable for the teams with owners who are merely rich.
 

chrispy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
1,444
A team could insure every player and each time one got hurt, the corresponding insurance amount would get added to the following year's Cap. The downside is that the insurance is a cost that's not re-coup'd, that is assuming the proceeds are spent on additional cap the next year. This system would allow a really rich owner to gain a lot of cap space. How it stands, it seems like teams make a decision on a (mostly) financial basis. If the system remains as is for a while, there will be more teams that spend in order to gain an advantage on cap calculations. It's just a matter of how much the owner is willing to decrease their profits in order to win.

If rumors about Bezos buying a (this) team turn out to be true, this could be a way to become more competitive quickly considering a limitless budget.
 

EverydayImRusselin

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
2,170
Reaction score
898
A team could insure every player and each time one got hurt, the corresponding insurance amount would get added to the following year's Cap. The downside is that the insurance is a cost that's not re-coup'd, that is assuming the proceeds are spent on additional cap the next year. This system would allow a really rich owner to gain a lot of cap space. How it stands, it seems like teams make a decision on a (mostly) financial basis. If the system remains as is for a while, there will be more teams that spend in order to gain an advantage on cap calculations. It's just a matter of how much the owner is willing to decrease their profits in order to win.

If rumors about Bezos buying a (this) team turn out to be true, this could be a way to become more competitive quickly considering a limitless budget.
I'm surprised this hasn't happened yet. In a league of parity, the competitive advantage that could be gained would be huge. Someone who is ultra wealthy, even by NFL owner standards could definitely break this system IMO.
 
Top