With the impact he can have on a game without even touching the football, MUCH higher is the only logical conclusion to have, unless you are being a Debbie downer.
He'll change field position on kickoff returns (of course they'll just be one of those), he'll attract more attention in the secondary, I've gotta believe it's better to have him on the field. I second the thought that we can win without him, but it's a bonus. He's giving me a bonus.
I do like the fact that he has only played a few plays with the Hawks. The Saints D coordinator has no idea what the are gonna do with him on the field, which adds an element of surprise, making the Saints a little more nervous about coming to Seattle.
Do I think we have a better chance at winning now? I had no doubt we were going to lose in the first place
We have gotten this far without him, but its a nice bullet to have in the chamber.