sc85sis
Well-known member
It's probably not very nice of me, but I'd love nothing better than to have the '9ers lose on a last-second Falcons score just like we did.
Hello, Mr. Schadenfreude!
Hello, Mr. Schadenfreude!
drdiags":3km1s54h said:BTW, hate to be a fuddy duddy, but this seems more like an NFL Forum Post. Though it tries to tie back to Seahawks interest if really is just a 9ers fan magnet and I see no reason to have to read 9ers posts in the main forum. The OP knows this but he tends not to like posting in the outlands because he likes for all to review his take. All I ask is that we be fair to those of us that really could do without the 9ers beehive this was intended to stir.
EDIT: And for the record. No way in hell do I want the 9ers to win the Superbowl or this coming weekend. I don't want to catch them while they were sleeping off a victory party. Catch them hungry. If you believe Pete's mantra of competition, you would want the team beating its opponents at their best.
NJSeaHawk":3o0bqzuo said:Never.
Root.
For.
The.
Niners.
EVER.
The last thing I want is some Niner Fan in here, waving their SIXTH trophy while we have none.
At least those insufferable bastards shut up when I say "quit living in the good old VHS days of your Super Bowls."
bestfightstory":xmig51fk said:HaHaHa. Well. That makes it a clean sweep of the division, kearly.
In 2009, you threatened to leave the Seahawks behind and support the Arizona Cardinals because you were pissed off about the Aaron Curry selection.
In week 17 of 2010 you openly supported the Rams to beat the Seahawks for the division and draft position.
And, here in 2013 you are rooting to see a San Francisco Super Bowl Chamqpionship.
Man. You get around.
AbsolutNET":xmig51fk said:Are you seriously saying that the 9ers winning the SB is bad for them?
AbsolutNET":1xaa6dw2 said:And, the Hawks didn't win the SB they played in.
AbsolutNET":1xaa6dw2 said:No they aren't, and no it doesn't. If they win, are you going to say "Boy, those Cardinals really aren't so bad!"
AbsolutNET":1xaa6dw2 said:So how many times have the SB champs division rivals gone on to win the super bowl?
kearly":26aqv50u said:Well, I would bet you that if the 49ers reach the SB you'll see topics a couple days after the big game talking about the SB curse and other aspects that do not favor SF. I just like to post things I see over the horizon, and at times they end up ahead of their time. Which I'm fine with.
Ninerguy":1xriu989 said:formido":1xriu989 said:Only the last thing you've done counts. Even today, 42-13 wins a lot of arguments and
Wilson: 1
Kaep: 0
...head-to-head wins a lot of arguments. No matter what happens this year, when SF loses its first game to us next year, you're gonna be able to cut the angst in the Bay Area with a knife.
LOL, regular season is only for playoff seeding, if it makes you feel better that Carrol finally beat Harbaugh then more power to ya...Playoff wins are all that matters and winning the SB is the only goal.
see ya next season!
kearly":3r5lyn7o said:AbsolutNET":3r5lyn7o said:So how many times have the SB champs division rivals gone on to win the super bowl?
How is this relevant? I am talking about the 49ers declining, not the Seahawks improving (I have a lot of faith in our FO and take improvement as a given). As far as eventual championships, that is a fair point, but IMO this trend could still benefit the Seahawks next season.
kearly":1h34arcj said:IMO, this IS a Seahawks topic though. Let's be 100% honest, if Seattle beats out SF for the division next year, their chances of winning the SB skyrocket. Everything that is bad for SF is great for us.