Rat":1kz5okk5 said:Mad Dog":1kz5okk5 said:Rat":1kz5okk5 said:Still a great coach, but damn, is there a worse challenger in the league? Thank God he didn't throw some other dumb flag in the first half or something or we wouldn't have been able to get the Tedric INT overturned.
He was 1-1 on challenges and so was McVay. I thought McVay's challenge on the OOB catch was dumber than Pete's challenge on the OPI.
Pete's challenge win rate isn't much different than the league average.
Everybody just sees things through Seahawks lenses without perspective.
Saying Pete is bad at challenges isn't the same as saying everyone else is great at it. Strange argument that McVay making a dumb challenge redeems Pete. The decisions stand on their own.
It sure seems like he throws the flag at some strange times. I hope he gets better at it, but I guess he shouldn't look to get better because other coaches have made poor decisions too.
Well if you are going to say that Pete is bad at challenges when he is the same as every other coach then you clearly have your bar set too high. Again I'm not saying that Pete is great at challenges. I'm just saying he's average compared to the rest of the worlds best football coaches. I find it ridiculous to assume that Joe Fan would be better than these guys in the same arena.
I will say that the decision to kick a FG at the end of the first half was nigh on indefensible. The best scenario was 3 points and enough time given to the Rams to do whatever they want with our mediocre D. Best scenario with going for it was a TD with no time on the clock. The worst scenario with the FG attempt is no points and Rams need 62 yds to score. Worse scenario with going for it was no points and Rams need 70 yds to score.
Given the chance of the FG make and the chance of the 4th and 1 conversion rate were within 5% of each other it's a no brainer to go for it.