Would this be a dream ownership for Seattle?( conspiracy)

Sprfunk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
1,074
Reaction score
385
Remember part of the deal was that the Supersonics would be a expansion and not a transfer, would keep thier history and get that back as well as their name, so Clippers would not fit that mold.
We can get the history back with moving a team here or expansion. I want expansion as I dont want to do to another market what was done to us.

Although, I guess I'm not too high on the soap box... if an unsupported team with nearly no fan support comes here I will chear the Sonics.
 

Ad Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
3,575
Reaction score
866
LA already has a team, different story I think. Sigh...
 

Bobblehead

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
5,613
Reaction score
2,217
I just don't understand how you can bring any team in and call them the Sonics, where there is no, absolutely no association with the Sonics ever. Sonics are gone, history, there are more associated with Oklahoma than anything..

Besides, stealing the Clipipers and bringing them here is no better than what OK guy did to us and take them to Oklahoma.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
44,038
Reaction score
28,099
Location
Sammamish, WA
They were here 40 plus years. Seattle will be the Sonics, as they should be. F OKC. Hanging banners that the SONICS earned in Seattle......in the rafters at OKC? How pathetic. They had NOTHING to do with those banners before they were stolen from Seattle.

Am I still bitter, hell yes I am.
 
Top